This document is a page from a court transcript (Exhibit A-5922 within Case 1:20-cr-00330, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell case) containing a legal argument. The text discusses a tax fraud case involving David Parse, Carrie Yackee, Jenkins & Gilchrist, and Deutsche Bank, focusing on whether Parse knew transactions were made solely for tax losses rather than investment purposes. This appears to be a citation of case law (likely U.S. v. Daugerdas) used as a precedent within the broader filing, rather than a direct record of Epstein's activities.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Parse | Defendant (in the cited case) |
Accused of implementing complex transactions for tax purposes; described as sophisticated.
|
| Carrie Yackee | Witness / Sales Assistant |
Testified she acted on Parse's instructions; described as a 'nice woman, but not nearly as sophisticated as Mr. Parse'.
|
| Coleman | Taxpayer |
Mentioned as a taxpayer involved in the transactions.
|
| Blair | Taxpayer |
Mentioned as a taxpayer involved in the transactions.
|
| Judge (Your Honor) | Judge |
Addressed by the speaker.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jenkins & Gilchrist |
Law firm involved in communications with David Parse's office and Deutsche Bank.
|
|
| Deutsche Bank |
Financial institution involved in communications regarding tax returns.
|
|
| Cisco |
Mentioned in the context of stock investments.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service listed in footer.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location involved in fax communications.
|
"To suggest that the jury could not have found that Mr. Parse knew that the reason that these were being done was to effectuate tax losses for the prior year is simply ludicrous."Source
"This wasn't just a one-way street between David Parse's office and Jenkins & Gilchrist, but it was at least a two-way street between Deutsche Bank and Jenkins & Gilchrist and also the accountants."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,692 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document