| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Redacted (Legal Assistant)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI's NY Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) regarding the forensic processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the US Virgin Islands. The correspondence reveals significant friction caused by technical incompatibility between the FBI's forensic tools and the USANYS's 'Relativity' review platform, exacerbated by delays due to COVID-19 and FBI network infrastructure updates. The document lists specific seized hardware (Dell servers, Sony laptops, various hard drives with NYC serial numbers) and concludes with USANYS seeking funding to hire a private vendor (BRG) to expedite the processing because they have lost confidence in the FBI's ability to deliver in a timely manner. While flight records are mentioned as a type of document contained within the evidence (specifically regarding the inability to link attachments to emails), no actual flight logs are present in this document.
This document contains a series of email communications between the FBI's New York Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence, dating from February to July 2020, details significant technical challenges in processing terabytes of data from various devices (Macs, Windows, servers, loose media) for legal discovery. Key issues include the incompatibility of forensic data with the US Attorney's 'Relativity' review platform, delays caused by COVID-19 and FBI network upgrades, and the need to identify specific device serial numbers for search warrants.
This document is a chain of emails between the FBI's Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the technical processing and transfer of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence reveals significant technical challenges, including the handling of encrypted devices, the volume of data (terabytes), and compatibility issues between forensic tools and the 'Relativity' e-discovery platform used by prosecutors. It mentions specific evidence including servers, hard drives from a 2007 search, and the inability to link emails to attachments like 'flight records' in the provided data dumps.
Email correspondence from November 12, 2019, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and a Senior Forensic Examiner regarding the processing of electronic evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein. The AUSA expresses concern that while the New York residence evidence (approx. 10-11 computers) was expected by late October, the 'island materials' (likely Little St. James) appear untouched by the FBI, which they describe as the 'tip of the iceberg.' The examiner responds that the process is complex but anticipates files will be ready by the following Thursday.
An email thread from July 2008 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (Southern District of Florida) and Colonel Gauger (likely PBSO). The prosecutor raises serious concerns about Jeffrey Epstein's work release arrangement, noting that the 'Florida Science Foundation' Epstein claimed to work for was only recently incorporated and located inside his attorney Jack Goldberger's office suite. The AUSA argues that Epstein sitting in his lawyer's office 'web-surfing' and ordering food does not constitute proper imprisonment.
This document contains an email chain between FBI agents and the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) in July 2008 regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses names found in 'message pads' that were not fully identified and expresses a belief that more victims will come forward following Epstein's conviction. It also includes an exchange with attorney Ted Leopold, who provides the names of two clients relevant to the investigation.
This document contains an email chain between late 2007 involving Federal Prosecutors (US Attorney's Office) and State Prosecutors (Palm Beach County ASA) regarding the 'Epstein settlement agreement.' The correspondence highlights the coordination between state and federal offices to ensure Jeffrey Epstein's state plea and sentencing occurred before January 4, 2008, specifically to satisfy the terms of a federal non-prosecution agreement. The emails reveal logistical challenges with Judge McSorley's scheduling preferences but confirm that the settlement was a 'definite go.'
Confirming receipt and stating intent to forward to FBI.
Follow up to WebEx discussion; provides list of 7 categories/questions for the attorney to ask their client regarding Epstein and Maxwell.
Request to create a new Victim & Witnesses Services page for the Maxwell case with specific text regarding charges and contact info.
Tom Winter per usual – he has some great source at FBI. Includes link to NBC article about Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest.
Request to put the attached subpoena to UBS in the mail.
FYI, attached, per our usual practice.
Detailed complaint about data integrity: emails separated from attachments, load files not linking to native files, and control numbers not matching. Mentions over 1 million documents received.
Initial complaint about disorganized data on hard drive, confusion over new vs old materials, request for tracking system.
Initial complaint about lack of organization in data dump. Mentions folder 'NYCO24362' with 600,000 items.
Discussing the logistics of dropping off a hard drive and requesting the FBI identify new vs. old materials to avoid duplication.
Dropped off Sweden travel memo. Delayed by OIA approval. Seeking Office and DOJ approval. Requesting meeting.
Discussing how to handle document requests from plaintiffs suing Epstein. Suggests instructing them to submit Touhy Requests. Mentions specific request from Robbie Kaplan at Kaplan Hecker.
Requesting immediate travel to Florida for FBI-arranged meeting with Epstein victims regarding case 2018R01618.
Confirming edits are straightforward and updated version is attached. Mentions being out of commission for a few hours.
Initial draft circulation based on conversations and responding to two defense letters regarding discovery motion schedule.
Discussing a draft response to Epstein defense letters, referencing a discovery motion schedule and input from a redacted individual regarding prefatory language.
Forwarding clean and redline versions of the document.
Sending attachment due to colleague's computer issues.
FBI is leaking the content of the indictment. [Link to Daily Beast]
Inquiry regarding a FOIA request related to the Epstein investigation being processed by the civil division, noting that the criminal investigation is still covert.
Requesting permission to travel to West Palm Beach for 3 days next week for meetings and interviews regarding the Epstein investigation. Mentions trying to pin down timing for interviewing victims.
Provided contact info for a female subject in California; discussed legal representation; proposed meeting her in person in California.
Request to load documents for US v. Epstein into Relativity under 'BSF second production' subfolder.
Requesting permission to travel for 'United States v. Epstein, 2018R01618', an investigation relating to enticement of minors for sexual activity. Requesting 3 days in West Palm Beach.
Confirmation that the request to load documents will be done.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity