| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
London School of Economics' Middle East Center
|
Institutional controversial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pan Am Flight 103
|
Perpetrator target |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Closing of the Turkish embassy in Tripoli | Tripoli, Libya | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 | Lockerbie, Scotland | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | OPEC meeting in Vienna | Vienna | View |
| 2011-03-01 | N/A | UN vote to authorise the use of force in Libya. | UN | View |
| 2003-01-01 | N/A | Libya elected to chairmanship of United Nations Commission on Human Rights. | United Nations | View |
This page is an excerpt from a geopolitical or economic analysis article, likely written by Ian Bremmer (identified by title as President of Eurasia Group). The text analyzes global oil markets, specifically focusing on increasing production in Iraq and North America (Bakken shale), and the dynamics of a recent contentious OPEC meeting in Vienna involving Saudi Arabia, Iran, Venezuela, and Libya. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production, likely related to investigations involving Jeffrey Epstein's financial connections or correspondence.
In this 2011 article, Ian Bremmer argues that despite immediate concerns over oil prices and supply disruptions from Libya, global oil supplies are fundamentally stable. He predicts that political risks from the Arab Spring are subsiding and that new supplies from sources like Brazil and Canada will soon alleviate market pressure.
This document appears to be a page from a report or a news clipping regarding the socio-political and economic state of Gaza (likely circa 2011-2012 given the references to the Libyan uprising). It discusses a construction boom, the smuggling of luxury cars from Libya via Egyptian tunnels, the political rivalry between Hamas and Fatah, and social observations regarding religious restrictions. While labeled with a House Oversight footer, this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or his financial network.
This page, marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp, appears to be an excerpt from a policy paper or article analyzing U.S. foreign policy under the Obama administration. It discusses the complexities of U.S. relations with China and Russia, specifically focusing on the failed 'reset' with Russia, tensions over the death of Sergei Magnitsky, and the strategic implications of a potential Russia-China alliance. The text highlights the administration's struggle to balance human rights concerns with geopolitical cooperation regarding Iran and Afghanistan.
This document is page 10 of a larger file, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It contains the text of an opinion piece or article discussing the political transition in Libya following Western intervention, comparing it favorably to the situation in Iraq and arguing that intervention was preferable to Gaddafi remaining in power. The author is identified only as a former director of policy planning for the US State Department.
This document appears to be page 9 of a policy paper or article draft produced by the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024600). The text analyzes US foreign policy, arguing for the effectiveness of 'leading from the centre' rather than 'leading from behind,' specifically referencing the Obama administration's approach to conflicts in Libya compared to Iraq and Afghanistan. It discusses the moral and interest-based arguments for interventionism and highlights the rising influence of social movements in the Middle East (Syria, Bahrain) and elsewhere (Israel, India).
This document is a scanned copy of a Financial Times opinion article dated August 24, 2011, written by Anne-Marie Slaughter. The article defends the US and Western intervention in Libya against skeptics (specifically naming Richard Haass), arguing that preventing Gaddafi's victory was crucial for supporting democracy and maintaining strategic interests in the Middle East. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a Congressional investigation.
This document is a page from a transcript, likely part of a House Oversight Committee investigation, featuring an analysis of Muammar Qadhafi during the Libyan Civil War. The speaker characterizes Qadhafi as a narcissist who cannot empathize with others and discusses the tactical situation in Libya, noting that rebels are in control and Qadhafi has few options due to ICC indictments against him and his son, Saif al-Islam. The text explores the psychology of Qadhafi's refusal to surrender, using a 'mirror, mirror' analogy to describe his self-perception.
This document page appears to be a transcript from a House Oversight Committee investigation (indicated by the footer). It features an interview with an author who wrote a profile in 'Foreign Policy' magazine regarding Muammar Qadhafi. The text analyzes Qadhafi's psychological state, describing him as having a 'borderline personality' that fluctuates between feeling invulnerable when succeeding (e.g., marching on Benghazi) and adopting a 'noble Arab warrior' persona when failing or under pressure.
This document appears to be page 3 of a transcript from a House Oversight investigation. The text features an unidentified speaker analyzing the psychology of authoritarian leaders during the Arab Spring, specifically focusing on Muammar Qadhafi's delusion that his people loved him and his belief that protestors were drugged or influenced by outsiders. The speaker contrasts Qadhafi's self-centered rhetoric with the inclusive leadership style of Winston Churchill.
A Scientific American article by John Matson dated August 23, 2011, questioning the mental state of Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi amidst the civil uprising. The article introduces an interview with Jerrold Post, a political psychology expert and CIA veteran, to analyze why dictators like Qadhafi deny reality during their impending downfall.
This document is a 'Presidential Press Bulletin' titled 'The Shimon Post' dated August 25, 2011, likely prepared for the office of Israeli President Shimon Peres. It lists six news articles from various international publications (Scientific American, Financial Times, NYT, etc.) focusing on geopolitical issues in Libya, Egypt, Syria, and Palestine. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024592).
This document appears to be a page from an email thread between 'pjr' (likely evolutionary biologist Peter J. Richerson) and an unidentified respondent (likely Jeffrey Epstein, given the document source). They discuss the evolutionary basis of psychopathy in dominance hierarchies, citing a 2016 BBS paper. The conversation shifts to a geopolitical analysis of Middle Eastern dictators (Saddam Hussein, Assad) and a critique of US foreign interventionism in the region.
This document contains a log of five digital messages exchanged on May 15, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation focuses on global geopolitics and US administration policy, specifically discussing Donald Trump, Jared Kushner's immigration plan, relations with China (One Belt One Road), Mexico, Qatar, Iran, Yemen, and Libya (specifically Haftar). The document originates from a House Oversight Committee production.
This document page, likely from a larger report or book excerpt submitted to the House Oversight Committee, details a narrator's 2011 trip to Cairo. The text describes a lunch meeting with Egyptian bloggers discussing the Arab Spring, U.S. subsidies, and democracy, while also reflecting on conspiracy theories in the region and a past warning from assassinated journalist Gibran Tueni. There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell on this specific page.
This document appears to be a page from a narrative report or article included in House Oversight files. It details the author's travels to the Arab World (specifically Casablanca) around the time of the Arab Spring (circa 2011), contrasting current anti-regime sentiments with the anti-American sentiments prevalent during the Iraq War era. It describes a student meeting dubbed 'The Pinata Session' and a large protest against King Mohammed VI, quoting opposition leader Reda Oulamine.
This document page appears to be page 16 of a transcript from an interview between Der Spiegel and 'Elaraby' (likely Nabil Elaraby of the Arab League). The discussion focuses on the geopolitical situation in Syria, specifically interactions with President Bashar Assad regarding reforms and violence, as well as the Arab League's limitations compared to the UN regarding the use of force. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for the U.S. House Oversight Committee, though this specific page contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document is a page from a Spiegel interview with Arab League General Secretary Nabil Elaraby, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. The interview discusses the geopolitical differences between the Libyan revolution and the Syrian uprising during the Arab Spring, with Elaraby explaining the strategic complexity of Syria compared to Libya. The document appears to be part of a larger briefing or evidence collection, indicated by the 'Article 4' header and 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer.
This document appears to be a page from a narrative report or book included in House Oversight evidence (labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024990). It details Hillary Clinton's foreign policy concept of 'smart power,' contrasting the financial agility of the military in Afghanistan with the bureaucratic hurdles faced by diplomats. It also discusses the internal U.S. government debate regarding the intervention in Libya, contrasting 'society' policymakers who wanted to support the uprising against the 'Old Guard' who feared destabilizing regional allies and distracting from containment of Iran.
This document appears to be a page (p. 22) from a book or narrative article included in a House Oversight Committee production (likely related to the Clinton Foundation or State Department investigations). It details Hillary Clinton's diplomatic challenges during the Arab Spring and the war in Libya, specifically focusing on the fallout from the WikiLeaks release of State Department cables. It mentions the embarrassment caused by Bradley Manning's leaks and the reactions of various world leaders, including Silvio Berlusconi and Vladimir Putin. Note: There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
This document appears to be a page from a narrative report or book contained within House Oversight files (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024978). It details Hillary Clinton's diplomatic travels in mid-March 2011 during the Arab Spring, covering meetings with French President Sarkozy in Paris, tense interactions with protesters in Cairo following Mubarak's fall, a visit to Tunisia, and the chaotic rollout of the military intervention in Libya. The text highlights the personal rapport between Clinton and Sarkozy while noting the logistical and political challenges of the coalition actions in Libya.
The document is a narrative page (numbered 19) bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It details Hillary Clinton's involvement in foreign policy during the Arab Spring (approx. 2011), specifically regarding the fall of Mubarak in Egypt and the debate over establishing a no-fly zone in Libya. It highlights internal disagreements within the Obama administration involving Robert Gates and Bill Daley regarding military intervention.
This document is an excerpt from a Vanity Fair article by Jonathan Alter titled "Hillary Clinton - Woman of the World." It details the chaotic diplomatic events of June 2011, specifically focusing on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's coordination with President Obama and European leaders regarding the intervention in Libya amidst the Arab Spring.
This document appears to be page 16 of a larger text, likely a book review or political analysis article, included in a House Oversight production. The text critiques the views of ElBaradei (presumably Mohamed ElBaradei) regarding nuclear proliferation, diplomacy, and the motivations of nations like Iran and North Korea. The author argues that ElBaradei shows too much sympathy for non-Western proliferators while underestimating security concerns of major powers.
This document appears to be page 15 of a book review or policy paper included in a House Oversight production (likely related to broader investigations, potentially appearing in the Epstein document dumps due to peripheral associations or bulk production). The text analyzes the views of Mohamed ElBaradei regarding the limitations of the IAEA, specifically citing a budget of $450 million and limited intelligence capabilities. It discusses geopolitical tensions involving the US, Syria, Israel, and the UN, criticizing the UN's political maneuvering (citing Libya's 2003 chairmanship) and the US's handling of intelligence regarding Iraq and Syria.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity