Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Redacted Workplace

Location
Mentions
7
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
3
Also known as:
workplace Redacted Workplace (Where victim was approached)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021687.jpg

This FBI internal memo from March 12, 2011, requests travel authority for two Miami agents to go abroad (location redacted) to interview a US citizen victim identified in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The document summarizes the investigation's origin in July 2006, noting Epstein's method of procuring underage girls from local high schools for paid sexual acts ($200-$1000) via other underage recruiters. It specifically details a victim who was recruited while working at a redacted location.

Fbi electronic communication / internal memo
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022319.jpg

This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing jurisdictional standards for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and outlining employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). It specifies financial thresholds for various employer categories and lists legal rights for employees (e.g., forming a union) and illegal actions by employers and unions. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein; its content is strictly about U.S. labor law.

Federal register publication (rules and regulations)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012445.jpg

This document is a page from a contentious deposition transcript where an unnamed female witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about evading people by switching name tags at work. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects forcefully, calling the question 'harassment' and refusing to let his client answer, leading to a heated exchange between the lawyers.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-17
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search