| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Authorities in Florida
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | SORA Hearing (Sex Offender Registration Act Hearing) | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) Hearing filed in court. | Courtroom (implied NY based... | View |
| 2019-07-15 | Sora hearing | A court hearing where Ms. Gaffney and the Court discuss the implications of a prosecutor's office... | Courtroom | View |
| 2018-12-28 | N/A | SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing | New York (Implied) | View |
This document is page 12 of a transcript from a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing filed on July 15, 2019. The dialogue involves a judge, prosecutor Ms. Gaffney, and defense attorney Ms. Musumeci discussing why Jeffrey Epstein must register as a sex offender in New York despite the specific acts (relations with a 17-year-old) not being registrable offenses under NY law; the requirement stems from reciprocity with his Florida offense. The Judge remarks that Epstein must register every 90 days or 'give up his New York home.'
This document is a page from a court transcript of a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing, filed as an exhibit in July 2019. The dialogue involves a prosecutor (Ms. Gaffney), a defense attorney (Ms. Musumeci), and the Judge discussing the age of a victim (disputed between 16 and 17) during her sexual relationship with the defendant. The defense argues that while the defendant pleaded guilty to 'under 18' in Florida, New York SORA laws require clear evidence of the victim being under 17 for registration as a sex offender.
This document is a page from a transcript of a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing filed on July 15, 2019. Attorneys Musumeci and Gaffney explain to the Court the specifics of Jeffrey Epstein's previous Florida plea deal, clarifying that while the indictment was not registrable, he pleaded guilty to a second offense 'by information'—specifically 'procuring a person under 18 for prostitution'—which requires registration.
This document is page 6 of a transcript from a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing filed on July 15, 2019. The discussion involves attorneys Ms. Gaffney and Ms. Musumeci addressing the Court regarding a board recommendation and access to prosecutor files. Ms. Musumeci clarifies for the record that Jeffrey Epstein is not a resident of New York, but rather maintains a vacation home there, with his primary residence being in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
This document is a page from a court transcript of a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing, filed in July 2019. The Judge expresses shock that the prosecution ('The People,' represented by Ms. Gaffney) is arguing for a 'downward modification' (reduced risk level) in a case the Judge finds 'troubling.' Ms. Gaffney explains that despite the unusual nature of the request, they are bound by board guidelines not to rely on unindicted conduct, and notes that her attempts to get clear evidence or interview notes from Florida authorities were unsuccessful because 'they never did' interview the women on their own.
This document is a transcript from a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing on July 15, 2019. The dialogue is between Ms. Gaffney and the Court, discussing whether the lack of an indictment by the prosecutor's office constitutes strong evidence that an offense did not occur. The Court expresses surprise at the prosecutor's actions and a 'Level Three' finding by a risk assessment board, finding the situation unprecedented.
Ms. Gaffney reached out to Florida authorities to see if they had interview notes or evidence that could be relied upon as 'clear and convincing evidence.'
Statement that anything from 'these women' would have been forwarded to them.
Ms. Gaffney expresses doubt that a lack of indictment can be relied upon as clear and convincing evidence, especially when the prosecutor's office never pursued the matter and victims did not cooperate.
Explaining that the offense is registrable in Florida and recognized by NY State Board of Examiners.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity