DOJ-OGR-00000378.jpg

637 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (sora hearing)
File Size: 637 KB
Summary

This document is page 12 of a transcript from a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing filed on July 15, 2019. The dialogue involves a judge, prosecutor Ms. Gaffney, and defense attorney Ms. Musumeci discussing why Jeffrey Epstein must register as a sex offender in New York despite the specific acts (relations with a 17-year-old) not being registrable offenses under NY law; the requirement stems from reciprocity with his Florida offense. The Judge remarks that Epstein must register every 90 days or 'give up his New York home.'

People (5)

Name Role Context
Mr. Epstein Defendant
Subject of the registration hearing; noted as having already registered and having a 'New York home'.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, questioning the registration requirements, and making rulings.
Ms. Gaffney Prosecutor/Government Attorney
Explaining the legal basis for registration requirements based on Florida offenses.
Ms. Musumeci Defense Attorney
Representing Epstein, confirming he has registered, and reserving the right to appeal.
Vikki J. Benkel Senior Court Reporter
Listed in the footer as the transcriber.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
New York State board of examiners
Mentioned as the entity recognizing the Florida offense.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Implied by the document stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.

Timeline (1 events)

07/15/19
SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) Hearing
New York Court
The Court Ms. Gaffney Ms. Musumeci Mr. Epstein (subject)

Locations (3)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the hearing and location of Epstein's home.
Location of the original offense requiring registration.
Property owned by Epstein, mentioned by the judge regarding the 90-day registration requirement.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Musumeci Attorney/Client Mr. Epstein
Ms. Musumeci speaks on his behalf: 'Mr. Epstein has already registered... we would reserve our right to appeal'
Ms. Gaffney Attorney/Judge The Court
Standard courtroom dialogue answering the judge's questions.

Key Quotes (4)

"consensual intercourse with him and 17 is not registrable or criminal under New York law."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000378.jpg
Quote #1
"He can give up his New York home if he does not want to come every 90 days."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000378.jpg
Quote #2
"Mr. Epstein has already registered and recognizes his duty to register."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000378.jpg
Quote #3
"I have had many cases like that where it was not registrable here but it was in the state where the person came from and New York recognized that."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000378.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,276 characters)

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 14 Filed 07/15/19 Page 13 of 18
SORA HEARING page 12
1 consensual intercourse with him and 17 is not registrable or
2 criminal under New York law.
3 And the prostitution aspect of having intercourse
4 with a 17 year old is not registrable conduct.
5 THE COURT: Why does he have to register here?
6 MS. GAFFNEY: Because it is a register able
7 offense in Florida, New York State board of examiners --
8 THE COURT: Recognizes it.
9 MS. GAFFNEY: Recognizes it, yes.
10 THE COURT: I have had many cases like that where
11 it was not registrable here but it was in the state where
12 the person came from and New York recognized that.
13 MS. MUSUMECI: Your Honor, we are not saying that
14 he should not register. Mr. Epstein has already registered
15 and recognizes his duty to register.
16 THE COURT: I am glad of that, very glad of that.
17 I am sorry he may have to come here every 90 days.
18 He can give up his New York home if he does not
19 want to come every 90 days.
20 Anything else?
21 I rely on the board.
22 MS. MUSUMECI: Your Honor, we would reserve our
23 right to appeal Your Honor's ruling.
24 THE COURT: Of course, do so.
25 MS. GAFFNEY: For the record, Your Honor, he is
Vikki J. Benkel
Senior Court Reporter
DOJ-OGR-00000378

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document