| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Victim Specialist
|
Professional team |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Professional subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Warden
|
Professional investigative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Warden
|
Professional regulatory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Warden
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-13 | N/A | Submission of letter regarding Juror 50's motion redactions. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-13 | N/A | Preparation of Motions in Limine (MIL) | New York | View |
| 2021-08-16 | N/A | In-person meeting with Mr. [Redacted] (Witness/Client) | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2021-01-28 | N/A | Filing of Document 128 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing | Court | View |
| 2020-12-21 | N/A | Court conference in United States v. Rivera where Judge Engelmayer raised the issue of disparity ... | Court | View |
| 2020-12-21 | N/A | Court conference for United States v. Rivera et al. | Court (likely SDNY) | View |
| 2020-12-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 78 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-05 | N/A | Filing of Document 5 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-13 | N/A | Meeting between MCC Warden and US Attorney | Unknown (likely New York) | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | US Attorney meeting with the Warden of MCC NY. | MCC NY (implied) | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | US Attorney meeting with MCC NY Warden at 10:00 AM. | Unknown (likely NY) | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Meeting between the Warden and the US Attorney | Unknown (likely MCC NY or U... | View |
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | Suppression Hearing | 40 Foley 1305 | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Filing of Document 11 in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB | United States District Court | View |
| 2018-11-30 | N/A | Conference call to determine the way forward on the Jeff Epstein matter. | Phone/Office | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) signing involving 40 names. | Florida | View |
| 2007-12-19 | N/A | Previous letter from US Attorney to Lilly Ann Sanchez referenced. | N/A | View |
| 2006-11-08 | N/A | Request for phone call between US Attorney (Miami) and Mr. K. | Phone | View |
| 0014-10-01 | N/A | Planned interview of a witness/victim by US SDNY Prosecutors and FBI agents at Fieldfisher office... | London, UK | View |
This document contains an internal email chain dated August 11-12, 2019, among Bureau of Prisons officials discussing the drafting of a press statement following Jeffrey Epstein's death. The emails propose language regarding placing two staff members from the MCC NY Special Housing Unit on administrative leave and discuss the timing of the release in relation to a meeting between the Warden and the US Attorney. There is also a request for information regarding staffing shortages and overtime to address press inquiries linking these issues to the incident.
This document is an email chain from August 11-12, 2019, among Bureau of Prisons officials drafting a press statement following Jeffrey Epstein's death. The emails discuss placing two staff members from the MCC NY Special Housing Unit on administrative leave and gathering data on staffing shortages, vacancies, and overtime to address press reports linking these issues to the incident. It also notes that the MCC NY Warden was scheduled to meet with the US Attorney on the morning of August 12.
This document is an internal Bureau of Prisons email chain from August 11-12, 2019, immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's death. Officials discuss drafting a press release to announce that two staff members in the Special Housing Unit at MCC NY have been placed on administrative leave pending an investigation. The emails also reference potential reassignment of a senior official (likely the Warden), a scheduled meeting between the Warden and the US Attorney, and concerns about press reports linking staffing shortages and overtime to the incident.
This document contains an email chain from August 11-12, 2019, involving Bureau of Prisons officials, including Hugh Hurwitz, discussing the immediate aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The emails draft a press statement announcing the placement of two MCC NY staff members on administrative leave and reference a potential third action (likely regarding the Warden). The correspondence also highlights concerns about press reports linking the incident to staffing shortages and overtime, and notes a scheduled meeting between the Warden and the US Attorney.
This legal document details a professional dispute between Criminal Division Chief Menchel and another individual, Villafaña, concerning the Epstein investigation. The text includes a communication from Menchel asserting his authority and admonishing Villafaña for bypassing the chain of command, alongside conflicting statements made by both parties to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). Villafaña characterized Menchel's communication as intimidating, while Menchel claimed Villafaña had a history of resisting supervision, highlighting significant internal conflict over the handling of the case.
This document is a page from a legal filing that quotes a lengthy email from an individual named Menchel to a recipient identified in a footnote as Sloman. In the email, Menchel severely criticizes Sloman for acting without authorization in the investigation of Mr. Epstein, specifically for preparing an indictment memo and misleading agents. Menchel also clarifies that his own conversation with Lilly Sanchez about the case was an informal exploratory discussion, not a formal plea offer, and was conducted with the full knowledge of the US Attorney.
An FBI administrative form (FD-5a) dated February 6, 2007, recording the permanent charge-out (transfer) of a document. The original document was an inlet dated January 24, 2007, from the US Attorney regarding a Federal Grand Jury (FGJ) subpoena. The file was transferred to a subpoena sub-file (SBP). The recipient and subject of the subpoena are redacted.
This document is a first-person statement, likely by Jeffrey Epstein, criticizing the handling of his plea deal and subsequent civil suits. He alleges that the government violated the spirit of his agreement, that an opposing attorney engaged in nepotism and excessive billing ($800,000), and that the accusers were unreliable witnesses who worked in the sex trade. He defends himself by claiming he was merely a 'consumer of prostitution' rather than a trafficker and explains he took the plea deal to avoid a mandatory 10-year sentence and a biased trial.
Notification that the Government refuses to enter into a stipulation regarding Robert Glassman's testimony.
Joint submission stating parties have no objection to the public filing of the December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order without redactions.
Joint letter detailing disagreement between Government and Defense regarding whether Warden Tellez should appear in court regarding Maxwell's detention conditions.
Argument regarding Ms. Maxwell's detention conditions (surveillance, searches) and a request for Warden Tellez to provide a first-hand accounting.
Conclusion regarding Government's commitment to disclosure obligations.
Request for the Court to approve the delay of disclosure regarding witness identities and sensitive materials pursuant to Rule 16(d).
Request to intervene and stay the civil case pending resolution of the criminal prosecution against Ghislaine Maxwell.
Proposal regarding the timeline for updating the Court on sealing positions.
Government opposition to defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials in civil cases.
Denial of request to use criminal discovery materials in civil litigation based on Protective Order and ongoing grand jury investigation.
Government request for time to respond to defense counsel's motion for a protective order.
Request to unseal the indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell and assign a District Judge.
Document regarding a Federal Grand Jury subpoena
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity