| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Phelps
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Contractor supervisor |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Successor]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SDNY/DOJ
|
Contractor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI Investigation Team
|
Contractor support |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Professional contractor |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-24 | N/A | Hamilton's last day at SDNY. | SDNY | View |
| 1962-01-01 | N/A | Victor Norris Hamilton arrives in Moscow. | Moscow | View |
This document is an email chain from September 17, 2019, regarding the 'Continued investigation into possible collaborators of Jeffrey Epstein.' An Assistant Attorney General (likely from New Mexico, given the 'NMAG files' reference and Clara Moran's involvement) sent secure files and a password to USANYS staff (including Madison Dunbar). The files were subsequently downloaded and saved to a DOJ network share with the case identifier 'USvEpstein-2018R01618'.
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between the FBI and SDNY regarding the Epstein investigation (Case USvEpstein-2018R01618). It details the coordination of a 'game plan' meeting involving a forensic accountant and the transfer of financial evidence (specifically subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank) burned onto discs by a contractor named Hamilton.
An email chain from April 2020 involving a Paralegal Specialist named Hamilton at the SDNY (Southern District of New York) requesting a consolidated hard drive of evidence 'returns' for the Epstein case. The recipient notes security restrictions preventing the attachment of external drives to the system holding 'financial productions' and plans to consult a special agent. The final email notes that Hamilton is leaving SDNY and hands off the case responsibilities to a colleague.
This document is an email thread from July 2019 between a contractor named Hamilton and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the SDNY. The AUSA requests Hamilton to burn digital folders containing subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank related to the 'USvEpstein-2018R01618' investigation onto a disc for a Special Agent and a Detective. The email coordinates the physical handover of this evidence, mentioning colleagues Mandy and Paul attending a conference.
This document is an email chain between the FBI and the Southern District of New York (SDNY) from July 2019 regarding the Epstein financial investigation. It details the retrieval of subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank, which were burned to discs for Special Agents. The emails also discuss the addition of a forensic accountant to the investigative squad and the scheduling of a meeting to discuss the scope of the financial investigation.
This document is a chain of emails from July 2019 between the FBI (New York field office) and the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence coordinates the transfer of subpoena returns (specifically from American Express and Deutsche Bank) burned onto discs by a contractor named Hamilton. The team also schedules a conference call to discuss a 'game plan' and introduces a forensic accountant to the investigative squad.
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between a contractor named Hamilton and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the preparation of evidence discs containing subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank related to the 'USvEpstein-2018R01618' investigation. The discs were to be delivered to a Special Agent and a Detective, potentially for hand-off at a conference.
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a motion or a judicial opinion, dated February 5, 2016. It outlines the legal standards for a 'motion to reconsider' in federal court, citing various precedents. The text explains that while not formally recognized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, district courts have inherent discretionary authority to reconsider non-final orders, but the scope for doing so is narrow and limited to specific grounds such as new law, new evidence, or correcting clear error.
This document is page 40 of a court filing (Exhibit 397-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. The content is an excerpt from an academic paper (page 296, likely by S. Craven et al.) analyzing the psychology of sex offenders, focusing on how they manipulate children into feeling guilt, the role of empathy in the grooming process, and the concept of 'cognitive deconstruction' which allows offenders to justify their actions. The document bears a Department of Justice discovery stamp.
This document is page 324 containing endnotes from a book, identified via the ISBN in the footer (9780451494566) as 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein. The page lists sources for chapters dealing with the NSA, Edward Snowden, Booz Allen Hamilton, and Russian espionage. It includes citations of articles from the Washington Post and NYT, as well as interviews conducted by the author with intelligence figures like James Angleton. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation production.
This document is page 223 from a book (likely titled 'The Russians Are Coming' or containing that chapter), marked with a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It details the history of NSA defectors Martin, Mitchell, and Hamilton who fled to the Soviet Union in the 1960s, as well as the case of KGB mole Sergeant Jack Dunlap. The text provides historical context on Cold War espionage but does not directly mention Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 7 of a Table of Authorities from a legal brief generated via Westlaw in 2019, likely related to the 9/11 terrorist attacks litigation ('In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'). It carries a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee. While the user identifies this as Epstein-related, there are no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or his immediate associates on this specific page; however, the inclusion of cases involving Deutsche Bank (implied by similar financial litigations) or UBS AG suggests this may be part of a larger file regarding financial institutions.
This document is page 306 of an academic paper authored by M. Hoffman et al., discussing game theory, specifically the 'Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma' and the evolution of altruism and cooperation. The text explores mathematical models of cooperation, reciprocity, and Nash equilibrium. While the content is purely academic, the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as evidence during a Congressional investigation, likely related to inquiries into Jeffrey Epstein's funding of academic research (such as Martin Nowak's PED at Harvard, though Nowak is not explicitly named on this page).
This document details the history of KGB infiltration within the NSA during the Cold War, specifically focusing on defectors like Victor Norris Hamilton and moles like Sgt. Jack Dunlap. It describes the fates of these individuals, ranging from defection to Moscow and institutionalization to mysterious deaths, and outlines the methods used by the KGB to recruit and exploit them for secret intelligence.
This document is page 269, which contains the endnotes for Chapter Twenty-One, titled "The Russians are Coming." It lists thirteen sources, including news articles, government documents, books, and interviews, related to Russian history, espionage, and intelligence operations involving agencies like the KGB, CIA, and NSA.
Revealed extent of US spying on Middle East allies in Izvestia.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity