Phelps
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Victor Norris Hamilton
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00001295.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a motion or a judicial opinion, dated February 5, 2016. It outlines the legal standards for a 'motion to reconsider' in federal court, citing various precedents. The text explains that while not formally recognized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, district courts have inherent discretionary authority to reconsider non-final orders, but the scope for doing so is narrow and limited to specific grounds such as new law, new evidence, or correcting clear error.
DOJ-OGR-00005791.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated October 29, 2021, which discusses the legal standards for the admissibility of expert testimony. It cites several legal precedents, including United States v. Felder and Kumho Tire, to argue that an expert's testimony can be based on personal experience and that it is generally the jury's role, not the court's, to resolve conflicting expert opinions. The document concludes by asserting that the rejection of expert testimony should be an exception.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity