One Saint Andrew’s Plaza, New York, New York 10007

Location
Mentions
222
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
111
Also known as:
New York, New York 10007

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00010364.jpg

This is a letter dated April 25, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests that the court order the Probation Office to complete its revised Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) earlier than the currently scheduled date of June 21, 2022. The letter argues that the current schedule, which has the revised PSR due on the same day as the defendant's sentencing submission, does not allow the parties sufficient time to incorporate the report's findings into their own submissions before the June 28 sentencing.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010319.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated April 1, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The government requests an extension, specifically an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, until April 22, 2022, for Counts Seven and Eight in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. This extension is sought to allow parties to continue researching and briefing pending post-trial motions, which the government argues is in the interests of justice.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004784.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated June 30, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter, submitted on behalf of both the prosecution and the defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, confirms that neither party requests any redactions to the Court's recent order denying Maxwell's suppression motion. Consequently, the parties have no objection to the public filing of the unredacted order and its accompanying exhibits.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00025416.jpg

This document is a report regarding the death of inmate Jeffrey Epstein at MCC New York on August 10, 2019. He was found unresponsive in his cell and pronounced dead at a local hospital.

Report
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005784.jpg

This is the cover page for a legal document filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The document is the government's omnibus memorandum opposing motions in limine filed by the defendant. It lists the prosecution team, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002874.jpg

This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 29, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government seeks to clarify a previous statement from October 2020 where it claimed no involvement by its prosecution team in an earlier 'Florida Investigation'. The letter now states that new information suggests the FBI's New York Office may have participated in that Florida investigation between 2005 and 2010, and the government is reviewing files to determine the extent of the interaction.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002867.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated March 29, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter serves to notify the court that a Grand Jury has returned a superseding indictment against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government outlines its intent to explain the differences between the new and prior indictments and address the impact on discovery and pending motions, while also stating it does not intend to seek further indictments if the trial proceeds as scheduled on July 12, 2021.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002820.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated March 26, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, who is presiding over the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution informs the court of a recent ruling in a separate case, U.S. v. Schulte, where Judge Crotty denied a motion to dismiss the indictment that was 'virtually identical' to one filed by Maxwell. The government argues that this precedent supports their position that Maxwell's motion should also be denied.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005203.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated October 12, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. In response to a court order, the government estimates its case-in-chief will last approximately four weeks. The letter also confirms that the government has provided the defense with its exhibit list, witness list, and other required materials.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008811.jpg

This legal document is a joint letter dated January 10, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter proposes a schedule for sentencing and the resolution of severed perjury counts as directed by the court. The Government's position is to schedule the sentencing proceeding approximately three to four months from the date of the letter to allow time for a Presentence Investigation Report and resolution of post-trial motions.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008798.jpg

The U.S. Department of Justice submitted a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that a juror has given multiple press interviews, revealing that he was a victim of sexual abuse and asserted that he "flew through" the juror questionnaire. The government brings these statements to the court's attention as they may have implications for the integrity of the jury selection process.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity