Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Signatory from Herman & Mermelstein, P
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-03-31 | Legal document service | A copy of a legal document was served by facsimile and U.S. mail. | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
DOJ-OGR-00030385.jpg
In a letter dated April 21, 2008, attorney Stuart S. Mermelstein informs attorney Jack A. Goldberger that his firm is representing a client identified as 'Jane Doe No. 5' in matters concerning the case *State of Florida v. Jeffrey E. Epstein*. Mermelstein requests that all future communication regarding his client be directed to his office and proposes scheduling a single deposition to be used for both the criminal and civil matters, subject to agreement and approval from the State Attorney's Office.
DOJ-OGR-00030430.jpg
This document is a subpoena for deposition issued by the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, in the case of the State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2006CF009454AXX). Signed on February 1, 2008, by attorney Jack A. Goldberger, it commands an unnamed recipient to appear for a deposition on February 6, 2008, at the Palm Beach County Courthouse. The document warns that failure to appear may result in being held in contempt of court.
DOJ-OGR-00031566.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service from the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P, dated March 31, 2008. It certifies that a legal document was served via facsimile and U.S. mail to two attorneys, Jack A. Goldberger and Lanna Leigh Belohlavek, at their respective offices in West Palm Beach, Florida. This serves as a formal record of notification in a legal proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00031537.jpg
This is a letter dated February 21, 2008, from attorney Theodore J. Leopold to attorney Jack A. Goldberger regarding the case of 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'. Leopold expresses serious ethical concerns about Goldberger's co-counsel, who refused to provide copies of exhibits to Leopold and the State Attorney during a direct examination the previous day. Leopold writes to confirm an agreement that Goldberger will now provide copies of all exhibits used.
Jane Doe v. Epstein
Theodore Leopold writes to Jack Goldberger to express concern about Goldberger's co-counsel's refusal to provide copies of exhibits to him and the State Attorney during a direct examination. Leopold is writing to confirm Goldberger's agreement to provide the exhibits.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity