DOJ-OGR-00031537.jpg
566 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
4
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
566 KB
Summary
This is a letter dated February 21, 2008, from attorney Theodore J. Leopold to attorney Jack A. Goldberger regarding the case of 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'. Leopold expresses serious ethical concerns about Goldberger's co-counsel, who refused to provide copies of exhibits to Leopold and the State Attorney during a direct examination the previous day. Leopold writes to confirm an agreement that Goldberger will now provide copies of all exhibits used.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Theodore J. Leopold | Attorney |
Sender of the letter, from the law firm Ricci Leopold.
|
| Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. | Attorney |
Recipient of the letter, from the law firm Atterbury, Goldberger, et al.
|
| Michael Tein, Esq. | Attorney |
Copied (cc) on the letter.
|
| Lanna Belohlavek, Esq. | Attorney |
Copied (cc) on the letter.
|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Mentioned in the 'Re:' line as a party in the case 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'.
|
| Epstein | Defendant |
Mentioned in the 'Re:' line as a party in the case 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| RICCI LEOPOLD, P.A. | law firm |
The law firm of the sender, Theodore J. Leopold, as shown on the letterhead.
|
| Atterbury, Goldberger, et al | law firm |
The law firm of the recipient, Jack A. Goldberger.
|
| State Attorney | government agency |
Mentioned as a party that was denied copies of documents and photographs during a direct examination.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2008-02-20
A direct examination took place where Jack Goldberger's co-counsel refused to provide copies of documents and photographs used as exhibits and refused to allow the court reporter to mark them.
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The address of Jack A. Goldberger's law firm.
|
|
|
The city and state of Jack A. Goldberger's law firm.
|
|
|
The address of the Ricci Leopold law firm, listed in the footer.
|
|
|
The city and state of the Ricci Leopold law firm.
|
Relationships (1)
Leopold is writing to Goldberger as a fellow attorney regarding a professional and ethical issue with Goldberger's co-counsel in the 'Jane Doe v. Epstein' case.
Key Quotes (3)
"This letter is written due to the deep and serious concern about the ethics of your co-counsel."Source
— Theodore J. Leopold
(Opening sentence of the letter, stating its purpose.)
DOJ-OGR-00031537.jpg
Quote #1
"Because your co-counsel refused to provide copies of the documents and photographs used in his direct examination of [REDACTED] yesterday to the State Attorney or me... I am quite fearful we may never see the exhibits again."Source
— Theodore J. Leopold
(Explaining the reason for the letter and the concern over the co-counsel's actions.)
DOJ-OGR-00031537.jpg
Quote #2
"Therefore I am compelled to write this letter to confirm that you have agreed that you will provide the State Attorney and me copies of all the exhibits, properly identified, that were used during the direct examination."Source
— Theodore J. Leopold
(Stating the action required from Jack Goldberger to resolve the issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00031537.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,393 characters)
02/20/2008 23:00 FAX
RICCI LEOPOLD
COMMITTED TO JUSTICE, TRUTH & SAFETY
COMMITTED TO JUSTICE, TRUTH & SAFETY
RICCI LEOPOLD, P.A.
CONSUMER JUSTICE ATTORNEYS
CONSUMER JUSTICE ATTORNEYS
February 21, 2008
VIA: FACSIMILE & U.S. MAIL
Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury, Goldberger, et al
250 S Australian Ave Ste 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015
Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury, Goldberger, et al
250 S Australian Ave Ste 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015
Re: Jane Doe v. Epstein
Dear Jack:
This letter is written due to the deep and serious concern about the ethics of your co-counsel. Because your co-counsel refused to provide copies of the documents and photographs used in his direct examination of [REDACTED] yesterday to the State Attorney or me, which is the professional and customary thing to do, and the fact that he refused to even allow the court reporter to mark the documents as exhibits I am quite fearful we may never see the exhibits again.
Therefore I am compelled to write this letter to confirm that you have agreed that you will provide the State Attorney and me copies of all the exhibits, properly identified, that were used during the direct examination.
Very truly yours,
THEODORE J. LEOPOLD
TJL:ms
cc: Michael Tein, Esq. (via facsimile and regular mail)
Lanna Belohlavek, Esq. (via facsimile and regular mail)
Lanna Belohlavek, Esq. (via facsimile and regular mail)
2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens Florida 33410 561.684.6500 fax 561.697.2383 riccilaw.com
CRASHWORTHINESS · INSURANCE BAD FAITH · MANAGED CARE ABUSE · PERSONAL INJURY · WRONGFUL DEATH
CRASHWORTHINESS · INSURANCE BAD FAITH · MANAGED CARE ABUSE · PERSONAL INJURY · WRONGFUL DEATH
DOJ-OGR-00031537
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document