This document consists of pages 26 and 27 from Michael Wolff's book 'Siege', labeled as House Oversight evidence. It details the political maneuvering within the Trump White House surrounding the March 22 (2018) appropriations bill, highlighting how staff (Pence, Short, Mulvaney) worked to pass the bill while Steve Bannon and Fox News hosts (Carlson, Ingraham, Hannity) mobilized the base against it over the lack of Wall funding. The text describes Trump's reaction to the media criticism, leading him to threaten a veto. Note: There is no mention of Epstein in this specific document excerpt.
This document is an excerpt from Michael Wolff's book 'Siege' (pages 16-17), stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the internal conflict within the Trump White House regarding Jared Kushner's business dealings, specifically a $184 million loan from Apollo Global Management (led by Leon Black) to Kushner Companies. The text describes Trump's anger that Apollo funded his son-in-law but not the Trump Organization, Ivanka Trump's distress over their legal exposure, and the role of lawyer Abbe Lowell in managing the family's defense against the Special Counsel investigation.
This document appears to be a glossary page (page xxiii) from a report titled 'USA Inc.' produced by Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers (KPCB). It provides definitions for various US government financial and policy terms, including Medicaid, Medicare, Mortgage-Backed Securities, and the OMB. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document contains two pages from a report titled "USA Inc.": an appendix listing useful government budget links and a legal disclaimer. The appendix provides URLs to reports from agencies like the CBO, Treasury, and Social Security Administration, while the disclaimer outlines the limitations of the report compiled by Mary Meeker and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.
This document consists of two slides from a KPCB presentation titled 'USA Inc.' discussing US government fiscal policy, specifically focusing on expense reduction and federal wage reforms. It contrasts data from USA Today/Cato Institute, the OMB/OPM, and The Heritage Foundation regarding whether federal employees are paid significantly more than private sector counterparts. The document contains a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021009', suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document analyzes US Federal spending for the 2010 fiscal year, treating the government as "USA Inc." and highlighting that entitlement spending constitutes more than half of the $29,043 expense per household. It also outlines strategic recommendations for improving government operating efficiency, such as independent audits, budget process reforms, and privatization of assets.
This document consists of two slides (numbered 331 and 332) from a KPCB presentation titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?'. The slides present macroeconomic data visualizing the rise of US government spending (total and federal) relative to median household income between 1967 and 2010. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021007, indicating it was produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to financial documents or attachments found within the scope of the inquiry.
This document consists of four handwritten telephone message slips from a notepad, dated July 9-10, 2004. Two messages are for a 'Mr Epstein' and two are for a 'Sarah'. One message for Epstein is from 'Ms Maxwell' and concerns the availability of someone named 'Brittny', while the other messages are simple requests to return calls.
This document is a table of contents for a publication titled 'Tax Topics,' listing subjects covered in 2002. The topics are exclusively related to U.S. tax legislation, IRS rulings, and economic policy discussions from that year, such as the 2001 Tax Act, estate tax, and stimulus proposals. The document contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related activities.
This document is a table of contents from a 2013 publication called 'Tax Topics', listing articles and legal updates from 2009 and 2010. The topics are highly technical and relate to U.S. tax law, including estate tax, IRA conversions, legislative proposals from the Obama administration, and various legal cases. The document itself contains no direct information about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or his activities; its relevance is likely contextual, originating from a larger file collection.
This document is a page from the U.S. Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing rules and procedures of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). It outlines employee rights, employer obligations regarding posting notices, and the process for filing charges for non-compliance. The document has no discernible connection to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related investigations.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing public comments and the issuing agency's response to a new labor rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights regarding unionization. The document discusses the economic impact of the rule, its classification under the Congressional Review Act, and its exemption from the Paperwork Reduction Act. This document is related to U.S. labor law and contains no information whatsoever about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related matters.
This document is page 13 of a letter from Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski to members of several congressional committees. The letter proposes an amendment to the "2005 reauthorization" to mandate collaboration between the Departments of Health and Human Services, Justice (Attorney General), and Homeland Security regarding a pilot program for victims. The letter states that the Office of Management and Budget has no objection to this proposal on behalf of the Administration.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity