["your Honor (Judge)"]

Person
Mentions
0
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
0

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.
No documents found for this entity.
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
5
Total
5

Argument regarding insufficient evidence for enticement c...

From: Unnamed speaker (attor...
To: ["your Honor (Judge)"]

An attorney argues that their client, Ghislaine, merely performed a 'ministerial function' by arranging travel, which does not meet the legal standard for enticement under the statute. The attorney cites the 2008 Second Circuit case 'United States v. Joseph' as precedent.

Legal argument
2022-08-10

Argument for insufficiency of evidence regarding enticeme...

From: Unnamed speaker (likel...
To: ["your Honor (Judge)"]

An attorney argues to a judge that Ghislaine's act of arranging travel was merely a 'ministerial function' and does not meet the legal standard for criminal enticement or persuasion, citing the Second Circuit's ruling in United States v. Joseph as precedent.

Courtroom argument
2022-08-10

Argument against bail for the defendant

From: The government (prosec...
To: ["your Honor (Judge)"]

A representative for the government argues to a judge that the defendant should be denied bail. The reasons cited include her being a flight risk, having unexplained wealth, lack of community ties, and proposing an insecure bail package that involves staying at a luxury hotel in Manhattan.

Court transcript
2021-04-01

Arguments regarding the nature and seriousness of the def...

From: Unnamed speaker (presu...
To: ["your Honor (Judge)"]

An unnamed speaker, likely a prosecutor, is addressing the judge ('Your Honor') to argue about the seriousness of the charges against the defendant. The speaker outlines allegations from an indictment, including transporting minors, conspiracy, perjury, and facilitating sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein.

Court testimony
2021-04-01

Victim statements in the case of People v. Jeffrey Epstein

From: Unnamed speaker (attor...
To: ["your Honor (Judge)"]

An attorney for the victims thanks the court for allowing the victims to be heard despite the defendant's death. The attorney also raises a suggestion that the court should investigate the circumstances of Mr. Epstein's death.

Court testimony
2019-09-03

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity