An attorney argues that their client, Ghislaine, merely performed a 'ministerial function' by arranging travel, which does not meet the legal standard for enticement under the statute. The attorney cites the 2008 Second Circuit case 'United States v. Joseph' as precedent.
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022, where an attorney argues that their client, Ghislaine, should not be convicted of enticement. The attorney contends that her act of arranging travel was merely a 'ministerial function,' akin to a travel agent's work, and lacked the necessary element of persuasion or inducement required by the statute. The argument is supported by citing the 2008 Second Circuit precedent in 'United States v. Joseph'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication