William B. King
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-01-17 | N/A | Service of Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
ORDER-SHOW%20CAUSE%20(TAG-DECLINE%20JURIS).pdf
A corrected order from the Supreme Court of Florida dated May 3, 2017, in the case of Jeffrey Epstein vs. Bradley J. Edwards. The court orders the Petitioner (Epstein) to show cause by May 18, 2017, why the court should not decline jurisdiction based on the precedent of Debrincat v. Fischer. The document lists service to several attorneys including Marc S. Nurik and Jack Alan Goldberger.
ORDER-FILING%20FEE%20DUE.pdf
A Florida Supreme Court order dated December 11, 2015, notifying Jeffrey Epstein (Petitioner) that he failed to pay the required $300.00 filing fee for his case against Bradley J. Edwards. The court set a deadline of January 11, 2016, to pay the fee or file for insolvency, warning that failure to do so would result in final dismissal of the case.
MOTION-EXT%20OF%20TIME%20(JURIS%20BRIEF).pdf
This is a legal motion filed on December 14, 2015, in the Supreme Court of Florida (Case No. SC15-2286) by Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris. Epstein requests an extension of time until January 19, 2016, to file his initial brief on jurisdiction. The document notes that the Respondent's counsel, Philip M. Burlington, has no objection to the request, and includes a service list of attorneys involved in the related proceedings.
MAIL%20RETURNED.pdf
This document contains court orders from the Supreme Court of Florida dated December 15, 2015, regarding the case Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards (Case No. SC15-2286). The court stayed proceedings pending the outcome of a separate case (Debrincat v. Fischer) and denied Epstein's motion for an extension of time as moot. The first page shows an envelope addressed to attorney Marc S. Nurik that was stamped 'Return to Sender' and filed/cleared by the clerk on December 28, 2015.
LETTER.pdf
This document is a legal filing dated December 10, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris, files a 'Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction' with the Supreme Court of Florida. Epstein is appealing a decision made on November 12, 2015, by the District Court of Appeal (Fourth District) in the case of 'Bradley J. Edwards v. Jeffrey Epstein'. The attached opinion reveals that the lower court reversed a summary judgment that had favored Epstein, ruling that 'litigation privilege' does not bar Edwards' claim of malicious prosecution against Epstein.
DISP-REV%20DY%20LACK%20JURIS%20(TAG).pdf
A 2017 Supreme Court of Florida order denying Jeffrey Epstein's petition for discretionary review in his case against Bradley J. Edwards. The court declined jurisdiction following a review of the response to a show cause order. The document lists the concurring justices and the individuals served with the order, including various attorneys and clerks.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT%20LETTER-NEW%20CASE.pdf
This document is an official 'Acknowledgment of New Case' from the Supreme Court of Florida, dated December 11, 2015. It confirms the receipt of a 'Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction' filed on December 10, 2015, in the case of Jeffrey Epstein vs. Bradley J. Edwards (Case No. SC15-2286). The document lists relevant case numbers from the lower tribunal and copies various attorneys and clerks involved in the matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013317.jpg
This document is a 'Certificate of Service' page from a legal filing dated January 17, 2014. It certifies that attorney William B. King served a copy of 'Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment' via E-Serve. The document lists the contact information for the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., representing Bradley J. Edwards.
Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment
Service of legal document copy.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity