Stephen J. Immelt

Person
Mentions
12
Relationships
4
Events
3
Documents
4

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
4 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Kathy Ruemmler
Professional recruitment
8 Strong
2
View
person Michael Davison
Business associate
8 Strong
2
View
person Kathy Ruemmler
Professional correspondence
7
1
View
person Kathy Ruemmler
Professional negotiation
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2016-02-27 N/A Discussion regarding the potential recruitment of Kathy Ruemmler to become a partner at the law f... N/A View
2016-02-01 N/A Discussion regarding a potential job opportunity for Kathy Ruemmler at Hogan Lovells. N/A View
2016-02-01 N/A Discussion about arranging a meeting between Kathy Ruemmler and Michael Davison regarding a poten... Unspecified, but Michael Da... View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025909.jpg

An email exchange between Kathy Ruemmler and Stephen Immelt (likely Hogan Lovells) discussing Ruemmler's potential recruitment. Immelt suggests she meet Global Head of Litigation Michael Davison, but Ruemmler insists on discussing compensation first. Ruemmler also makes a side comment expressing disbelief that Chris Christie endorsed Donald Trump.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025908.jpg

This document is an email chain from February 27, 2016. Kathy Ruemmler forwards an email from Stephen J. Immelt (CEO of Hogan Lovells) to Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) with the single comment 'Unsatisfactory'. In the original email, Immelt discusses negotiation terms for Ruemmler joining the firm, specifically noting that her compensation would fall outside their normal 'bell curve' but is justified by her potential contribution.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026379.jpg

This document is an email thread from February 2016 between Kathy Ruemmler and Stephen J. Immelt of Hogan Lovells. They are discussing a potential career move for Ruemmler to the law firm, with Immelt suggesting a meeting with Michael Davison, the global head of litigation. Ruemmler agrees but insists on discussing compensation first, citing the significance of the move. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Email
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026378.jpg

This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein (as 'Jeffrey E.' from 'jeevacation@gmail.com') to Kathy Ruemmler on February 27, 2016. Epstein advises Ruemmler to 'ask for a financial proposal' and forwards her a recruitment email from Stephen J. Immelt, the CEO of the law firm Hogan Lovells. Immelt's email discusses the exceptional compensation Ruemmler would receive and mentions a 'Michael' who could provide a 'global perspective' on a case.

Email
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
2
As Recipient
1
Total
3

Re: Follow up

From: Kathy Ruemmler
To: Stephen J. Immelt

Ruemmler expresses interest in meeting Michael but insists on discussing compensation first as it would be a 'big move'. Comments on Christie endorsing Trump.

Email
2016-02-27

RE: Follow up

From: Stephen J. Immelt
To: Kathy Ruemmler

Discussing compensation falling outside the 'bell curve', economic sense of the move, and the role of Michael.

Email
2016-02-27

Follow up (implied)

From: Stephen J. Immelt
To: Kathy Ruemmler

Immelt suggests Ruemmler meet Michael Davison, the global head of litigation.

Email
2016-02-25

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity