Daugerdas
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Parse
|
Co defendants |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Business introduction | Shih introduced David and his partner Rod McKay to Daugerdas. | N/A | View |
| 2012-01-01 | Legal proceeding | A new trial was granted to three defendants in United States v. Daugerdas based on juror dishones... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2012-01-01 | Legal proceeding | Court case: United States v. Daugerdas | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2010-03-04 | N/A | Grand jury returned a third superseding Indictment charging Parse and others. | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009534.jpg
This document is a page from a 2013 legal filing (likely a sentencing memorandum) concerning the tax fraud case of United States v. Daugerdas et al. It details the conviction of David Parse for obstructing the IRS and mail fraud, noting he faces a statutory maximum of 23 years in prison. While this document is included in the unsealed bundle for the Giuffre v. Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cv-00330), the text specifically addresses the legal proceedings and sentencing guidelines of the Daugerdas tax shelter scheme, likely serving as a legal exhibit or precedent within the broader Maxwell litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00009514.jpg
This legal document, a page from a letter to Judge William H. Pauley, III, argues that a defendant named David was not a culpable participant in the illegal aspects of the Jenkins tax shelter scheme. The author contends that David's acquittal on conspiracy and tax evasion charges, along with his co-defendant's full acquittal, shows the jury believed David did not know the shelters were illegal. The document attributes David's belief in the shelters' legality to high-level approval from Deutsche Bank and the belief that a legal "loophole" had been found, suggesting his convictions for mail fraud and tax obstruction were solely for separate "backdating" transactions.
DOJ-OGR-00005326.jpg
This document is page 4 of a proposed juror questionnaire filed in a federal criminal case on October 22, 2021. It contains standard background questions for potential jurors, along with comments reflecting a legal dispute between the defendant and the government. The defense argues for including these detailed questions in the written questionnaire, citing precedent from other high-profile cases, while the government objects, arguing the questions are inappropriate for a written form and are better suited for oral voir dire.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity