David
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bridget Rodgers
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Juror defendant |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
jeevacation@gmail.com
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Shih
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Juror witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Rod McKay
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Paul Daugerdas
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Craig Brubaker
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Daugerdas
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Kenneth Norwick
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Thomas E. Carnaghi
|
Community |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Phil Allen
|
Community |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kathryne Maguire
|
Community |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Charles Austerberry
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Theresa Parse
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Parent
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Miller
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Thomas Carnaghi
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Theresa Austerberry
|
Spouse |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
James Yetter
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Phil Allen
|
Community character witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Theresa Parse
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E.
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Employment | In eighth grade, David began working part-time as a busboy in a local restaurant. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | David drove from Chicago to spend time with Thomas Carnaghi and his family for over three weeks a... | Chicago | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The jury acquitted Maxwell on count two of the charges against her. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Employment | David got his first job at age 11, delivering the Detroit News. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | David commuted from Ann Arbor to Detroit to work as a waiter while in college. | Ann Arbor to Detroit | View |
| N/A | Jury verdict | The jury acquitted Maxwell on 'count two' of the charges against her, which related specifically ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | A former business associate asked David to consult on the endowment fund for an inner city high s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Pre-trial questionnaire administration | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 'David' shares personal story in the jury room. | Jury Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury deliberation regarding count two involving Jane. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Pre-trial questionnaire | Court | View |
| N/A | Business introduction | Shih introduced David and his partner Rod McKay to Daugerdas. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (50-question survey) | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A jury trial where David was acquitted on tax conspiracy and substantive tax evasion counts, and ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury deliberation | The jury discussed the case, including why victims returned to Epstein and Maxwell, and ultimatel... | Jury room | View |
| N/A | Personal support | David provided support to Bridget Rodgers when she was pregnant and had an infection. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Coaching | David coached a boys' basketball team, focusing on individual development and life lessons. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Act of kindness | David ensured a boy with severe disabilities on his basketball team was helped by other players t... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A jury acquitted David on tax conspiracy and tax evasion counts, and completely acquitted his co-... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Coaching | David coached a boys' basketball team, including a boy with severe disabilities whom he helped to... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Personal support | David provided counsel and encouragement to Andrew Miller when his son was diagnosed and hospital... | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-11 | N/A | David started his first job delivering newspapers. | Detroit | View |
| 2022-01-26 | N/A | Jury Selection / 50-question survey | Court | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell Trial | Court | View |
| 2019-04-12 | N/A | Meeting/Note: David/MSI and Mike Stock | Unknown | View |
EFTA00027394.pdf
An email dated August 2, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to attorneys Sigrid McCawley and 'David'. The email serves to notify them of an order by Judge Nathan regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, emphasizing that it applies to attorneys associated with cases, including those representing witnesses.
EFTA00003027.pdf
This document is a photograph of a desk calendar from April 2019 containing various handwritten notes, phone numbers, and logistical details. Key entries include references to 'EB/Dufrene', 'Lesley', and 'Paul Stewart' with a phone number, as well as a specific local IP address (192.168.119.76:7443) and notes about a 'Chevy/Trailer' moving to location '4757'. The calendar also lists contractors for heavy equipment and carpentry.
DOJ-OGR-00022284.tif
This document is a flight log from October to November 2004, detailing flights primarily on a B-727 (N9O8JE) and a G-1159B (N9095E). It records numerous flights with passengers identified by initials like 'J' and 'K', along with other individuals such as Laura, Andrew, David, Natalie, Pia Trusell, and Andrea, traveling between locations including TIST, PBI, JFK, LFPB, JAX, TEB, DFW, ABY, and BED. The log also includes a simulator flight with specific training remarks and is signed by pilot David Riders.
DOJ-OGR-00020872.jpg
This legal document excerpt details a juror's, named David, perspective on the acquittal of Maxwell on a specific charge ('count two') involving an accuser named Jane. David explains that while Jane's story was corroborated by flight logs and Epstein's 'little black book', the jury ultimately found insufficient direct evidence to prove Maxwell had 'enticed' Jane to travel, which was required for a conviction on that charge. The decision was based on a lack of evidence for that specific action, not on a disbelief of the victim.
DOJ-OGR-00020871.jpg
This document appears to be a court exhibit containing excerpts from media interviews (MailOnline, The Independent) with a juror named 'David' following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. David explains that the jury was swayed by the 'pattern' of grooming established by multiple accusers (Kate, Jane, Annie Farmer, Carolyn), despite the defense's attempts to challenge memories via expert Loftus. He specifically notes that while accuser Kate's testimony could not be used for charges due to UK laws, it was crucial for establishing the grooming methodology.
DOJ-OGR-00020870.jpg
This document is a legal exhibit containing an excerpt from an article in The Independent featuring an interview with a juror named David following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. David explains that the jury found the victims credible despite defense attempts to attack them and use memory expert Elizabeth Loftus to cast doubt on their recollections. He highlights a specific moment where a victim named 'Carolyn' became distressed on the stand, noting that such incidents increased his compassion rather than creating doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00016026.jpg
This document is a handwritten flight log page (No. 111) signed by pilot David Rodgers, covering flights from August 3, 2004, to October 13, 2004. It records movements of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft (N908JE and N909JE) and helicopter training in Texas. Passengers include Jeffrey Epstein (JE), Ghislaine Maxwell (GM), Sarah Kellen (SK), the Dubin family, and several others. There is a consistent redaction of a specific passenger's name on nearly every flight involving Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00015759.jpg
A household shopping list dated March 3, 2005, detailing specific grocery items including meats, beverages, cereals, and cheeses. The document specifically mentions 'Ms Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell) and 'David' as individuals who will provide further instructions on purchasing meat and fish. It includes a section for items specifically from 'Carmine Giardini's Market', indicating the location is likely in the Palm Beach area.
DOJ-OGR-00009176.jpg
This document is a court filing (Exhibit 615-2) containing a screenshot of a Daily Mail article dated January 26, 2022. The article features an interview with a juror named David who explains his reasoning for convicting Ghislaine Maxwell, stating she was a 'predator' who facilitated Epstein's abuse. The text also notes legal concerns regarding David's potential failure to disclose past experiences during jury selection, which experts suggested could lead to a mistrial.
DOJ-OGR-00009173.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing detailing a juror's (David's) explanation for Ghislaine Maxwell's acquittal on a specific charge (count two) involving the accuser 'Jane'. David clarifies to 'The Independent' that the jury's decision was based on a lack of direct evidence that Maxwell 'enticed' Jane to travel, not on a disbelief of Jane's testimony. The document also mentions corroborating evidence such as flight logs and Maxwell's 'little black book', which listed names of 'masseuses' and Palm Beach police officers.
DOJ-OGR-00009172.jpg
This document contains excerpts from an interview with a juror named David following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, filed as a court exhibit. David explains that while the jury could not convict based on accuser 'Kate's' testimony due to UK age of consent laws, her testimony was crucial in establishing Maxwell's grooming 'pattern' involving boundary confusion and massage. David also defends his own responses to the pre-trial questionnaire regarding sexual abuse history.
DOJ-OGR-00009171.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing, detailing the perspective of a juror named David. David explains to The Independent why he and the jury found the victims credible, despite defense arguments about their behavior and the fallibility of memory. He emphasizes that the jury's role was to judge the stories, not the victims' decisions, and notes that the defense's memory expert, Professor Elizabeth Loftus, did not sway their verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00010197.jpg
This document is a legal brief or letter to The Honorable William H. Pauley, III, discussing the case of a man named David, who was convicted of backdating transactions. It references the impact of the conviction on David's family and cites legal precedent from the United States Supreme Court and United States v. Adelson.
DOJ-OGR-00010193.jpg
This legal document, a letter from Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III, argues on behalf of a client named David. It contends that while David was convicted for 'backdating' transactions, the jury's acquittal on more serious tax evasion and conspiracy charges suggests they believed he was unaware of the illegality of the Jenkins tax shelter scheme itself. The letter posits that David was given comfort by the participation of major entities like Deutsche Bank and believed he was exploiting a legal 'loophole'.
DOJ-OGR-00010191.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing, specifically a letter dated March 7, 2013, from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III. The letter argues for the good character of an individual named David by citing several character reference letters from people like Charles Austerberry, Theresa Parse, and Bridget Rodgers. These letters praise David's compassionate and effective coaching style, his focus on teaching life lessons over winning, and his commitment to supporting friends in times of need.
DOJ-OGR-00010190.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III, dated March 7, 2013. It primarily serves as a character reference for a defendant named 'David,' detailing his 15 years of volunteer work as a youth sports coach in Hinsdale and his role as a father. A footnote discusses the serious health issues of an individual named Theresa (referenced via a letter from Theresa Parse) dating back to 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00010188.jpg
This document is page 4 of a letter dated March 7, 2013, from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to The Honorable William H. Pauley, III. The letter provides several character references for a broker named David, quoting former colleagues and associates who describe him as honest, diligent, and always prioritizing his clients' interests. A footnote indicates that David has been sued by taxpayers over disallowed tax shelters.
DOJ-OGR-00010187.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing, likely a sentencing memorandum, addressed to Judge William H. Pauley, III. It outlines the personal and professional history of a man named David, detailing his education at the University of Michigan, his strong friendships from college, and his successful career progression through several prominent financial firms, including Touche Ross, Goldman Sachs, Kidder Peabody, and Alex Brown & Sons, from his graduation until his indictment in 2009. The document uses letters from friends to portray him as a loyal friend and generous person.
DOJ-OGR-00010186.jpg
This document is page 2 of a letter dated March 7, 2013, from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III. It describes the strong work ethic and positive character of an individual named David, detailing his humble, blue-collar upbringing, early jobs starting at age 11, and achievements in academics and sports. The letter cites supportive statements from Bridget Rodgers and Scott Mordell to portray David in a favorable light, likely as part of a legal proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00009855.jpg
This document is a printout of a Daily Mail article filed as a court exhibit (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) on March 11, 2022. It details statements made by a juror named 'David' following the guilty verdict of Ghislaine Maxwell, where he describes her as a 'predator' who was 'just as guilty as Epstein.' The text also notes legal concerns regarding David's potential failure to disclose being a victim of sexual abuse during jury selection.
DOJ-OGR-00009852.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing containing an excerpt of an interview with a juror named David regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. David explains to 'The Independent' why the jury acquitted Maxwell on 'count two' related to accuser Jane, citing a lack of direct evidence for 'enticement' across state lines despite believing the victim. The text also highlights corroborating evidence such as flight logs and Epstein's 'little black book,' which contained names of victims alongside 'mom' and 'dad,' as well as Palm Beach police officers listed familiarly.
DOJ-OGR-00009851.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) containing an article or transcript featuring interviews with a juror named David following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. David explains to media outlets (MailOnline and The Independent) how the jury relied on corroborated testimony to establish a 'pattern' of grooming, specifically citing victims Kate, Jane, Annie Farmer, and Carolyn. He details specific grooming tactics used by Maxwell, such as acting like a teenager and normalizing nudity or massage, and dismisses the defense's expert witness on memory.
DOJ-OGR-00009515.jpg
This legal document, dated March 7, 2013, from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III, argues for a lower sentencing guideline for a client. It contests the Probation Office's preliminary calculation, which suggests a 292-365 month sentence based on a $1.5 billion tax loss. To support its argument, the document cites a letter from a juror detailing the conviction of David Parse, suggesting his conviction was limited to "backdating" transactions and not a broader conspiracy.
DOJ-OGR-00009514.jpg
This legal document, a page from a letter to Judge William H. Pauley, III, argues that a defendant named David was not a culpable participant in the illegal aspects of the Jenkins tax shelter scheme. The author contends that David's acquittal on conspiracy and tax evasion charges, along with his co-defendant's full acquittal, shows the jury believed David did not know the shelters were illegal. The document attributes David's belief in the shelters' legality to high-level approval from Deutsche Bank and the belief that a legal "loophole" had been found, suggesting his convictions for mail fraud and tax obstruction were solely for separate "backdating" transactions.
DOJ-OGR-00009512.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III, dated March 7, 2013. It compiles excerpts from several character reference letters written in support of a man named David. The letters portray David as a compassionate and effective youth sports coach who prioritizes children's personal development and life lessons over winning, contrasting his calm approach with that of other coaches.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | David | Unknown seller | $600.00 | Purchase of a used car using money earned from ... | View |
Juror questionnaire
Discussed the pre-trial questionnaire regarding sexual abuse history.
Corroboration of testimony
Discussed how accusers corroborated each other and established a pattern.
Jury Deliberations
David discusses jury dynamics, victim credibility, and defense strategies.
No Subject
Juror David explains the reasoning behind the acquittal on count two and discusses evidence.
Pre-trial questionnaire
David stated he couldn't remember details of the questionnaire but felt he answered honestly.
Corroboration of evidence
David discussed how accusers' testimonies were corroborated and established a pattern.
Juror's perspective on a trial
Juror David shared his story and perspective on the trial with The Independent, including his belief in the victims' credibility.
Client investment matters
A former business associate mentions they could overhear David's phone calls with clients at Credit Suisse First Boston.
Jury's reasoning for acquitting Maxwell on count two
Juror David explained to The Independent that the jury acquitted Maxwell on count two not because they disbelieved Jane, but because there was insufficient direct evidence that Maxwell had 'enticed' her to travel.
Jury's reasoning for acquitting Maxwell on count two
Juror David explained to The Independent that the acquittal on count two was due to a lack of direct evidence of enticement, not a disbelief of the victim, Jane.
Mutually acceptable statement
Plea to keep trying for a joint statement; suggested text for a statement claiming mistaken identity.
Follow up on statement
Drafted specific language for Roberts to say regarding 'mistaken identification' and offered that the statement could come from the lawyer rather than her.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity