MDC
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sophia Papapetru
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Detainee facility |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court order | The Court issued an order directing the MDC to permit Ms. Maxwell access to a computer on weekend... | MDC | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019809.jpg
This document represents a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) detailing proceedings between December 1 and December 3, 2020, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding conditions of confinement, the sealing of documents, and the denial of a request for an in-camera conference regarding a bail motion. The document also records the placement of several sealed documents into the court vault.
DOJ-OGR-00019792.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from Case 21-58, dated March 24, 2021, listing a series of court filings from February 2021 in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The filings primarily consist of motions from Maxwell's defense team to suppress evidence, dismiss charges, and obtain pretrial disclosures, along with supporting memoranda and affidavits. The log also records letters to Judge Alison J. Nathan from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense concerning Maxwell's conditions of pretrial confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00019785.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 1 to December 3, 2020. It details communications regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and a significant order by Judge Alison Nathan denying a request for an in-camera conference while setting a schedule for a renewed bail motion. The document also notes the sealing of specific documents to protect the privacy interests of individuals referenced in defense letters.
DOJ-OGR-00019784.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020, related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, extensions granted for discovery deadlines, and disputes regarding the timing of evidence disclosure. Significant attention is paid to Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, with Judge Nathan ordering the parties to confer with Warden Heriberto Tellez regarding the defendant's concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00019766.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from a legal case, detailing a series of court filings in February 2021 related to Ghislaine Maxwell. On February 4, 2021, Maxwell's defense team filed numerous motions to suppress evidence and dismiss various charges from the superseding indictment. The log also records subsequent sealed filings and letters to Judge Alison J. Nathan from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense concerning Maxwell's pretrial confinement conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00019759.jpg
This document is a court docket log from December 2020 regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records correspondence between the US Government (AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz) and Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and requests to seal certain documents. Key events include the Judge ordering MDC counsel to submit information, denying a request for an in-camera conference, approving redactions to protect privacy interests, and ordering the parties to schedule a renewed bail motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019758.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various procedural filings, including discovery deadline extensions, an affidavit from AUSA Maurene Comey, and the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit. Notably, it includes orders regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically ordering parties to confer regarding Warden Heriberto Tellez addressing her concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00019729.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) detailing filings between November 6, 2020, and December 1, 2020, related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Key entries include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan extending discovery deadlines, and specific orders regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, including a directive involving Warden Heriberto Tellez. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Sternheim) regarding discovery materials and detention conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00019707.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 1-3, 2020, detailing procedural events in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes letters from the prosecution regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement and sealing requests, as well as orders from Judge Alison Nathan denying an in camera conference but allowing specific redactions to protect the privacy interests of individuals referenced in defense letters. The Judge also orders MDC legal counsel to submit information regarding confinement conditions and sets the stage for a renewed bail motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019706.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Page 13 of 19) for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various procedural filings including letters from the prosecution (USA) and defense regarding discovery deadlines, conditions of confinement at the MDC, and the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit. Key events include Judge Nathan setting new deadlines for motions and discovery, and ordering parties to confer regarding Maxwell's request for Warden Heriberto Tellez to address her detention conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00017362.jpg
This document is the final page of a court transcript from a proceeding on August 10, 2022, filed as Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge discusses rising COVID incidents at a facility and states they will look into availability of something at a location called MDC. After confirming neither the government (Ms. Moe) nor the defense (Ms. Sternheim) have anything further, the court is adjourned.
DOJ-OGR-00010750.jpg
This is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan dated June 25, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a letter from the defendant regarding her access to legal materials needed for sentencing preparation at the MDC. The Court confirms with the MDC Warden that Maxwell has been given access to documents and a writing implement and orders the Government to follow up with the Warden and report back to the Court by 2:00 p.m. the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00010730.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 26, 2022, details the situation of a defendant at the MDC. After the defendant emailed the Bureau of Prisons Inspector General's Office on June 24, 2022, claiming threats from staff, the Warden and Chief Psychologist assessed her to be at high risk for self-harm. Consequently, instead of placing her in the Special Housing Unit, they put her on suicide watch, noting her inconsistent statements and refusal to cooperate with psychology staff, and suspecting she may be attempting to get a single cell to engage in self-harm.
DOJ-OGR-00010587.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against a lenient sentence for a defendant. The Government refutes the defendant's claims of abuse and poor health during her confinement at the MDC, citing BOP records and courtroom observations of her being 'perfectly healthy'. The Government requests that the Court impose the maximum allowable fine of $750,000, arguing it is warranted given the defendant is a 'multi-millionaire' whose wealth may have come from a co-conspirator.
DOJ-OGR-00010584.jpg
This document is a Government filing addressing Ghislaine Maxwell's complaints regarding her confinement conditions at the MDC. It refutes claims about discovery access, clarifying that she was provided a laptop and ample attorney visits. It also addresses email deletions (attributing them to BOP policy or Maxwell's own actions), legal mail delivery, and justifies nighttime flashlight checks as standard safety procedures for all inmates.
DOJ-OGR-00010582.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Government on June 22, 2022, argues against the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell's) complaints regarding her confinement conditions at the MDC. The prosecution asserts that her claims of abuse are unfounded, as determined by a BOP investigation, and are part of a pattern of dishonesty aimed at garnering public sympathy, citing a November 2021 Daily Mail article as a previous example of this tactic.
DOJ-OGR-00010482.jpg
This document is a page from a defense sentencing memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell should receive sentencing credits for harsh pretrial detention conditions. The text portrays Maxwell as a hardworking humanitarian who helped launch the Clinton Global Initiative and founded TerraMar, while characterizing her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as a singular mistake resulting from vulnerability caused by her father's death.
DOJ-OGR-00010476.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE filed on June 15, 2022, argues that the pre-sentence detention conditions of Ms. Maxwell at the MDC constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The filing claims her treatment is significantly harsher than that of the general prison population and was implemented under specific directives from then-Attorney General William Barr, who was intent on avoiding a repeat of the incident involving Epstein in BOP custody. The document asserts this disparate and punitive treatment was condoned by MDC supervisors and wardens.
DOJ-OGR-00010474.jpg
This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated June 15, 2022, arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-sentence detention conditions were discriminatory and harmful to her mental health. The text details symptoms of depression and trauma allegedly caused by confinement and claims that an MDC psychologist was overruled by directives from Washington, D.C. regarding placing Maxwell on suicide watch despite a lack of suicidal indicators. It also notes her isolation due to COVID restrictions and reliance on prison staff for information.
DOJ-OGR-00010468.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing for a downward variance in Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing due to unusually harsh pre-sentence confinement. The defense claims Maxwell was held in a 9x7 foot isolation cell for 22 months under unparalleled restrictions specifically to prevent another 'Epstein debacle' and to punish her in Epstein's stead. It also details a lack of due process regarding her transfer to the general population, noting that while other inmates were consulted about her arrival, neither Maxwell nor her counsel were notified.
DOJ-OGR-00010455.jpg
This document, identified as part of a Presentence Investigation Report, details a recommendation by Probation on June 9, 2022, for a 240-month imprisonment sentence for Ms. Maxwell, followed by five years of supervised release. It outlines mitigating factors, including her age, philanthropic history with organizations like the Clinton Global Initiative and The TerraMar Project, and her activities during incarceration, such as completing courses and tutoring inmates. The document also notes Ms. Maxwell's intention to appeal her conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00010454.jpg
This document is a legal filing (Page 8 of 77) from June 15, 2022, arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-sentence detention conditions were punitive and politically motivated to restore DOJ/BOP reputations following Jeffrey Epstein's death. It details a specific incident where a fellow inmate claimed she was offered money to strangle Maxwell in her sleep, highlighting the danger Maxwell faces in general population at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00004778.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court filing from June 16, 2021, regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details the conditions of the defendant's confinement at the MDC, specifically highlighting her access to attorney communications (25 hours of VTC per week and weekend in-person visits) and the security measures in place, including soundless camera monitoring and mandatory searches (pat-downs, mouth checks, and strip searches).
DOJ-OGR-00004760.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated June 15, 2021, detailing a portion of the sentencing hearing for a defendant named Ms. Days. After counsel for the government suggests a 60-month sentence is appropriate, Ms. Days addresses the judge. She describes the extreme hardship of her incarceration since 2019, particularly at the MCC facility during the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, which she claims was significantly more difficult than her time at MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00004759.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding on June 15, 2021. An unidentified speaker, likely an attorney, is arguing on behalf of their client, Ms. Days, emphasizing her good conduct while incarcerated. The speaker highlights that Ms. Days spent 75 days in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) without any disciplinary infractions ('tickets'), arguing that this experience has already served as a significant punishment and deterrent.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity