MDC
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sophia Papapetru
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Detainee facility |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court order | The Court issued an order directing the MDC to permit Ms. Maxwell access to a computer on weekend... | MDC | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020647.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket (SDNY CM/ECF) for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 4, 2021, and March 1, 2021. It records defense motions for a Bill of Particulars and a Third Motion for Bond, as well as multiple sealed documents and correspondence regarding MDC confinement conditions. The document also includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling responses for the bond motion and granting an extension for defense replies.
DOJ-OGR-00020640.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from December 2020. Key events include a letter from Maxwell's counsel regarding a motion for bail, a subsequent order from Judge Alison J. Nathan denying a request to summon the MDC warden to testify about Maxwell's confinement conditions, and the filing of a conference transcript. The judge ordered the government to provide regular updates on Maxwell's access to legal materials and counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020543.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries on November 8 and 9, 2021. It details various pre-trial motions and orders, including the denial of a renewed bail request, the scheduling of a conference regarding Rule 412 (evidence of sexual behavior) and expert witnesses (Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus), and orders regarding the humane transport of the defendant and delivery of legal mail. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs) and the Judge, as well as filings by the defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020540.jpg
This document is a court docket log from late October to early November 2021 in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. It details procedural orders regarding legal mail at the MDC, scheduling for Rule 412 (sexual behavior evidence) and Daubert (expert witness) hearings, and disputes over redactions in court filings. It also records a minute entry for a pretrial conference attended by Maxwell and her defense team alongside government prosecutors, noting that Maxwell remains remanded.
DOJ-OGR-00020534.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case covering October 13-15, 2021. It details various procedural orders, including arrangements for victim attendance at trial, overflow rooms for public access, and deadlines for motions under Federal Rule of Evidence 412. Additionally, there is a significant dispute recorded regarding delays in the delivery of legal mail to Maxwell at the MDC, resulting in a court order expressing the expectation that mail be delivered within one business day.
DOJ-OGR-00020529.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket (entries 302-308) covering June 16 to July 1, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence obtained via grand jury subpoena and ordering the unsealing of documents related to the civil case *Giuffre v. Maxwell*. The judge also granted a request regarding the reporting of Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC, limiting government updates only to material changes.
DOJ-OGR-00020528.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet covering the period from May 25, 2021, to June 15, 2021, detailing legal proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders setting trial disclosure schedules (including victim identities and Jencks Act material), a denial of a subpoena motion, and a mandate from the US Court of Appeals affirming the denial of Maxwell's bail and addressing complaints about sleep deprivation in custody. The document also references correspondence between defense attorneys (Everdell, Sternheim) and Judge Nathan regarding pretrial motions and confinement conditions at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020524.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from May 3 to May 7, 2021. Key entries include Judge Nathan granting a trial continuance to Fall 2021 to allow the defense to prepare for new charges, orders ensuring Maxwell's access to discovery hard drives at the MDC, and various correspondences regarding subpoena requests and 'flashlight security checks' at the detention center. It also notes a deleted document that was filed incorrectly.
DOJ-OGR-00020521.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from April 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty to a superseding indictment, various motions regarding subpoenas and trial scheduling, and a specific incident where Maxwell's defense claimed MDC guards wrongfully seized her confidential legal documents. Judge Nathan issued scheduling orders for pretrial motions and ordered MDC counsel to explain the seizure of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020475.jpg
This document is a court docket log from June 24-26, 2022, relating to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders permitting victims Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre to make in-person statements at sentencing. The docket also records communications regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials at the MDC, defense motions regarding victim impact statements from Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, and the denial of Maxwell's request to redact victim statements.
DOJ-OGR-00020439.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from October 29, 2021, to November 2, 2021. It lists various court orders regarding legal mail, motions in limine, redactions, and scheduling for Daubert and Rule 412 hearings. It also includes a minute entry for a pretrial conference attended by the defendant, legal counsel, and government representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00020433.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell covering October 13-15, 2021. It details procedural motions regarding juror selection (voir dire), the attendance of alleged victims at the trial, and disputes over the delivery speed of Maxwell's legal mail at the MDC. The document also references filings related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (the 'Rape Shield Law') and includes orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020425.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from May 2021 regarding USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details legal motions and orders, specifically highlighting a dispute over Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC, where her lawyers claimed flashlight checks every 15 minutes were sleep deprivation. Judge Nathan denied the request to alter BOP security protocols but urged the MDC to consider reducing sleep disruption. The document also covers administrative motions regarding deadline extensions and the sealing/redaction of documents to protect third-party privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00020423.jpg
This document is a court docket log from May 2021 regarding the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including granting a trial continuance to Fall 2021 and ensuring Maxwell's access to discovery hard drives and attorney-client communications at the MDC. The log also records various letters filed by both the prosecution (USA) regarding subpoenas and prison conditions (flashlights), and the defense regarding witness disclosures.
DOJ-OGR-00002341(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 1, 2021, is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim arguing that her client, pretrial detainee Ms. Maxwell, should continue to be allowed laptop access on weekends and holidays. Sternheim contends this is a reasonable accommodation necessary for reviewing extensive electronic discovery for trial preparation and that it imposes no burden or security risk on the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) or the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
DOJ-OGR-00002271.jpg
Defense attorney Christian Everdell writes to Judge Alison Nathan requesting a court order compelling the BOP/MDC to allow Ghislaine Maxwell access to a laptop on weekends and holidays to review 'millions of documents' for her defense. The letter argues there are no security impediments to this request. Judge Nathan grants the unobjected-to request and orders the BOP to provide said access on January 15, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002270(1).jpg
This document is a letter from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 14, 2021, requesting a court order to allow Ghislaine Maxwell access to a government-provided laptop on weekends and holidays to review discovery materials. The letter notes that the current prison computer lacks necessary software, the volume of discovery is massive ahead of the July 12, 2021 trial, and the government does not object to this request. It also highlights that Maxwell previously had daily access during a quarantine period in late 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00002268.jpg
A letter from defense attorney Christian Everdell to Judge Alison Nathan requesting a court order for the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell weekend and holiday access to a discovery laptop. The defense argues that the standard prison computer lacks necessary software to review voluminous evidence before the July 2021 trial, noting that the government does not object to the request. The letter highlights that Maxwell previously had full access during a COVID quarantine period in late 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00002268(1).jpg
A legal letter from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a court order for the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell weekend and holiday access to a discovery review laptop. The letter argues that current prison computers lack necessary software to review millions of documents before the July 12, 2021 trial, and notes that the government does not object to this request.
DOJ-OGR-00002257.jpg
A letter motion dated December 31, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Christian R. Everdell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a two-week extension for pretrial motions. The request cites a large volume of discovery and difficulties conferring with Maxwell due to her 14-day quarantine and the suspension of legal visits at the MDC caused by COVID-19. Judge Nathan signed and ordered the new schedule on January 5, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002257(1).jpg
A letter motion dated December 31, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Christian R. Everdell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a two-week extension for pretrial motions. The request cites a large volume of discovery and difficulties conferring with Maxwell due to her 14-day quarantine and the suspension of legal visits at the MDC caused by COVID-19. Judge Nathan signed and ordered the new schedule on January 5, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002255.jpg
A legal letter filed on December 31, 2020, by defense attorney Christian Everdell to Judge Alison Nathan requesting a two-week extension for pretrial motions in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The request cites a large volume of discovery and difficulties conferring with Maxwell due to her recent 14-day quarantine and the suspension of legal visits at the MDC caused by COVID-19. The prosecution consented to the request, and a new schedule is proposed leading up to a July 12, 2021 trial date.
DOJ-OGR-00002255(1).jpg
This document is a letter dated December 31, 2020, from Christian R. Everdell, an attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The attorney requests a two-week extension for filing pretrial motions in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The justification for the request is the large volume of discovery materials and the fact that Maxwell was recently placed in a 14-day COVID-related quarantine at MDC, which has suspended in-person legal visits.
DOJ-OGR-00002253.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 30, 2020, is a court ruling regarding a defendant's detention. The Court acknowledges the alarming spread of COVID-19 at the MDC facility where the defendant is held but denies release, stating the pandemic is not a sufficient basis to override its finding that the defendant is a substantial flight risk. The Court also notes the defendant has no underlying health conditions and deems a new hearing unnecessary, resolving the matter based on the submitted papers.
DOJ-OGR-00002253(1).jpg
This legal document is a court order or memorandum explaining the decision to deny a defendant's release from detention. The Court acknowledges the alarming spread of COVID-19 at the MDC facility where the defendant is housed but concludes that this does not outweigh the finding that the defendant is a substantial flight risk. The Court also notes the defendant has no underlying health conditions and determines that a new hearing is unnecessary, resolving the matter based on the submitted legal briefs.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity