DENIS FIELD
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Parse
|
Co defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Parse
|
Co defendants |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Crime | A wide-ranging corrupt endeavor and mail fraud scheme to defraud the IRS through the design, mark... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 646-10, an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII), in case 13-1388-cr in the United Sta... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010204.jpg
This document is the cover page for an Amended Sentencing Memorandum filed on March 18, 2013, by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Preet Bharara) regarding defendant David Parse. The case (S3 09 Cr. 581) involves multiple defendants including Paul Daugerdas, Donna Guerin, and Denis Field. The document also bears markings indicating it was later filed as Exhibit A-6074 in a 2020 civil case (1:20-cv-00338-AJN) on August 24, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00010155.jpg
This document is an affidavit filed by David Parse on August 7, 2012, in the criminal case *USA v. Daugerdas et al.* (Case 1:09-cr-00581). In the affidavit, Parse attests that during jury selection, he heard attorney Theresa Trzaskoma mention a juror had the same name as a suspended attorney but dismissed it as a coincidence. Parse states he only learned later (after a motion for a new trial was filed) that the issue of the juror ('Conrad') actually being the suspended lawyer had surfaced prior to deliberations. Note: While this document bears a DOJ-OGR stamp often associated with Epstein-related releases, the text strictly concerns the Daugerdas tax fraud case and juror misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00009903.jpg
This document is the cover page for Volume XVI of a legal appendix filed on February 24, 2022, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for case number 13-1388-cr. The case is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant David Parse and others against the United States of America. The document identifies the parties involved and lists the legal counsel for both the government (Appellee) and the appellant David Parse.
DOJ-OGR-00009528.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 18, 2013, outlines the case against an individual named Parse, an investment representative at Deutsche Bank. It details his central role in a massive criminal tax fraud scheme involving fraudulent tax shelters, which resulted in over $7 billion in fraudulent deductions and over $230 million in actual losses to the U.S. Treasury. The document argues that Parse's conduct, for which he earned over $3 million in commissions, warrants a significant prison sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00009527.jpg
This document is an Amended Sentencing Memorandum filed by the United States on March 18, 2013, regarding defendant David Parse. It outlines the procedural history, noting Parse's conviction on May 24, 2011, for obstructing IRS laws and mail fraud following an eleven-week trial involving 'one of the largest tax fraud schemes ever charged.' The document appears to be part of a larger case file (possibly related to the Jenkens & Gilchrist tax shelter case) that may have been included in a larger document production.
DOJ-OGR-00009525.jpg
This document is the cover page for an Amended Sentencing Memorandum filed by the United States (via US Attorney Preet Bharara) regarding defendant David Parse in the case *United States v. Paul Daugerdas, et al.* (S3 09 Cr. 581). Originally filed on March 18, 2013, this specific copy was submitted as Exhibit A-6074 on February 24, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), likely as legal precedent or background material.
DOJ-OGR-00009476.jpg
This is an affidavit from David Parse, a defendant in case S3 09 Cr. 581 in the Southern District of New York, filed on August 7, 2012. Parse states that he only became aware of a potential issue regarding a juror named Conrad being a suspended lawyer after his legal team, the Brune firm, had already filed a motion for a new trial. He specifies learning this information after a conference call on July 15, 2011, and recalls his lawyer, Theresa Trzaskoma, had previously dismissed a concern about a prospective juror having the same name during jury selection.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity