DOJ-OGR-00010155.jpg
541 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal affidavit (court filing)
File Size:
541 KB
Summary
This document is an affidavit filed by David Parse on August 7, 2012, in the criminal case *USA v. Daugerdas et al.* (Case 1:09-cr-00581). In the affidavit, Parse attests that during jury selection, he heard attorney Theresa Trzaskoma mention a juror had the same name as a suspended attorney but dismissed it as a coincidence. Parse states he only learned later (after a motion for a new trial was filed) that the issue of the juror ('Conrad') actually being the suspended lawyer had surfaced prior to deliberations. Note: While this document bears a DOJ-OGR stamp often associated with Epstein-related releases, the text strictly concerns the Daugerdas tax fraud case and juror misconduct.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Parse | Defendant/Affiant |
Author of the affidavit, defendant in the case US v. Daugerdas et al.
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma | Lawyer |
Attorney at the Brune firm; allegedly commented on a juror having the same name as a suspended attorney.
|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant |
Listed in case caption.
|
| Donna Guerin | Defendant |
Listed in case caption.
|
| Denis Field | Defendant |
Listed in case caption.
|
| Conrad | Juror/Suspended Attorney |
Subject of potential juror misconduct; referred to as 'Juror No. 1'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Court where the case is filed.
|
|
| Brune firm |
Law firm representing the defendant(s).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2011-05-12
Ms. Trzaskoma considered the possibility that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney.
New York
Theresa Trzaskoma
Juror No. 1
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the court and where the affidavit was sworn.
|
Relationships (1)
Parse discusses hearing Trzaskoma speak during his trial proceedings.
Key Quotes (2)
"I heard one of the lawyers at the Brune firm (I believe it was Theresa Trzaskoma) say that there was a prospective juror (or a juror) who had the same name as a suspended attorney but that it was not the same person."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010155.jpg
Quote #1
"It was not until after the Brune firm filed its motion for a new trial that I learned that prior to jury deliberations the issue of Conrad being a suspended lawyer had surfaced."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010155.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,511 characters)
Case 1:20-cv-08138-LAP Document 463-2 Filed 08/24/22 Page 57 of 171 A-5872
Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 544 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 544 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS,
DONNA GUERIN,
DENIS FIELD, and
DAVID PARSE,
DONNA GUERIN,
DENIS FIELD, and
DAVID PARSE,
Defendants.
§
§ ECF CASE
§
§ Case No. S3 09 Cr. 581 (WHP)
§
§ AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID PARSE
§
§
§
§
§ ECF CASE
§
§ Case No. S3 09 Cr. 581 (WHP)
§
§ AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID PARSE
§
§
§
§
STATE OF NEW YORK )
ss.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
ss.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
DAVID PARSE, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. My name is David Parse, and I am a defendant in the above-captioned case.
2. During jury selection (or shortly thereafter), I heard one of the lawyers at the Brune firm (I believe it was Theresa Trzaskoma) say that there was a prospective juror (or a juror) who had the same name as a suspended attorney but that it was not the same person. I cannot recall if the lawyer was speaking to me or if I overheard her speaking to someone else.
3. A week after the verdict, I met with the Brune lawyers to discuss possible post-trial motions and appellate issues. The possibility of a juror misconduct issue was not raised.
4. It was not until after the Brune firm filed its motion for a new trial that I learned that prior to jury deliberations the issue of Conrad being a suspended lawyer had surfaced. More precisely, to the best of my memory, it was after the July 15, 2011 conference call that I learned (i) that on May 12, 2011, Ms. Trzaskoma had considered the possibility that Juror No. 1
3689133.1
DOJ-OGR-00010155
DOJ-OGR-00010155
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document