Boston, MA
LocationRelationship Network
025.pdf
This document is a cover letter filed on July 17, 2019, by attorney Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The letter submits attached documents concerning Epstein's New Mexico registration status to support his bail application, following up on a previous letter dated July 16, 2019. The filing also lists Martin G. Weinberg and Marc Allan Fernich as additional counsel.
017.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 16, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to be admitted Pro Hac Vice to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists Weinberg's contact information in Boston, Massachusetts.
007.pdf
This document is a motion filed on July 11, 2019, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Reid Weingarten, Martin G. Weinberg, and Marc Allan Fernich) requesting the court's permission to file a supplemental financial disclosure under seal. The defense argues that due to the high profile nature of the case and the Bail Reform Act (18 U.S.C. § 3153(c)(1)), the financial details should remain confidential to prevent them from being disseminated by the news media. The document emphasizes that the financial disclosure is intended solely for bail determination purposes.
024.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion to Dismiss filed on July 6, 2023, in the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:23-CV-03903) regarding the JPMorgan Chase & Co. Derivative Litigation. The defendants, including JPMorgan Chase, James Dimon, and various board members, are moving to dismiss the Amended Stockholder Derivative Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23.1 and 12(b)(6). The defendants are represented by WilmerHale and Paul, Weiss firms.
EFTA00038134.pdf
This document is a printout of a law enforcement database query (NJP Response via eJustice NY) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 2, 2019 (the day of her arrest). It contains her personal identification details, including her full name, date of birth, SSN, physical description, and a Boston, MA residence address. It also lists her Massachusetts driver's license details, including ID number, issue date (2018), and active status.
EFTA00037706.pdf
This FBI email from July 2, 2020, summarizes intelligence linking Ghislaine Maxwell to a property in Bradford, NH, and a mansion in Massachusetts. The analysis connects Maxwell to Scott Borgerson and Adam Ghander through a web of LLCs (Angara, Granite Realty, Tidewood) and a law firm (Nutter, McLellen & Fish), noting a $20 million transfer from Maxwell to an entity named Angara.
EFTA00032410.pdf
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated December 12, 2018, sent to a redacted recipient. It summarizes various legal news stories, including the conviction of an ex-FDIC staffer, the sentencing of SUNY Polytechnic's president, bribery charges against Bloomberg/Turner executives, and updates on Paul Manafort, Huawei, and Stormy Daniels. The document lists numerous law firms and companies in its sidebar, including 'Epstein Becker Green', which likely triggered its inclusion in Epstein-related searches, though it refers to a law firm, not Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00030518.pdf
An email chain from July 25, 2019, involving defense attorney Martin G. Weinberg and others regarding the case 'US v Epstein'. Weinberg confirms his intent to sign a Protective Order on behalf of the defense team and requests information on the timing and format of the first wave of discovery. Subsequent emails discuss internal coordination with individuals named Maurene and Andy to prepare materials before an upcoming conference.
EFTA00028985.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on July 11, 2019, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys requesting permission to file his supplemental financial disclosure under seal. The defense argues that under the Bail Reform Act, such financial information should remain confidential to prevent widespread media dissemination given the high-profile nature of the case. The document lists Epstein's legal team, including Reid Weingarten, Martin G. Weinberg, and Marc Allan Fernich.
EFTA00028423.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 23-24, 2019, between defense attorney Martin G. Weinberg and an Assistant United States Attorney for the SDNY regarding a Protective Order for the Jeffrey Epstein case (indicated by attachment name '_JE_'). Weinberg outlines several objections to the government's draft, specifically concerning the handling of discovery materials at the MCC (where the defendant is held), the redaction of witness identities, and the labeling of FBI 302 reports. The chain concludes with the AUSA sending a revised order incorporating some edits for signature.
EFTA00027975.pdf
This document contains an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Martin G. Weinberg) shortly after Epstein's death in August 2019. Weinberg requests a 'taint team' protocol for computers seized from Epstein's Virgin Islands residence to protect attorney-client privilege, similar to protocols used for previous seizures in NYC. He also inquires about the timing of the dismissal of charges (nolle prosequi) and indicates the defense team wishes to speak with investigators regarding Epstein's death. Additionally, the emails note that Epstein's brother, Mark Epstein, is represented by Stacey Richman.
EFTA00027176.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2019 discussing the legal status of Jeffrey Epstein's estate shortly after his death. Attorney Martin G. Weinberg informs recipients that a Petition to Probate the Epstein Estate and Will was filed in the Virgin Islands on August 15, 2019.
EFTA00024407.pdf
An email exchange dated August 14, 2019 (four days after Jeffrey Epstein's death) between attorney Martin G. Weinberg and an individual addressed as 'Alex' (whose name is redacted in the header). Weinberg, along with 'Mike' (likely Michael Miller), states they are authorized to discuss 'potential civil forfeiture issues' regarding the US v Epstein case. The parties agree to a conference call scheduled for the following morning at 9:30 AM.
EFTA00022489.pdf
This document is an AT&T Wireless invoice for Jeffrey E. Epstein for the billing period ending May 02, 2004. It details extensive call logs including domestic calls primarily between New York and Florida, as well as international activity involving France, the UK, Brazil, and Belgium. The invoice specifically documents a trip to St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands (CHTAMSTTHS VI), between April 6 and April 8, 2004, evidenced by 'Roamer Usage' logs.
EFTA00022349.pdf
This document is an email chain from July and August 2019 involving attorney Jonathan M. Albano (representing Oath Inc.) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The correspondence concerns 'US v. Gatto' and a motion by Oath Inc. to intervene to obtain materials. Albano specifically requests to file the Second Circuit's July 3, 2019 decision in 'Brown v. Maxwell' (a case involving unsealing documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein) as supplemental authority, linking the legal standards of public access between the two cases.
EFTA00020937.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 1, 2019, between attorney Martin Weinberg (representing Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted government official (likely DOJ). Weinberg is coordinating the preservation of documents, specifically inquiring about notifying AUSAs in the Southern District of Florida (SD Fla) and other districts. He attaches a 'Supplemental Discovery Letter' and seeks confirmation on whether the recipient will handle the preservation requests or if Weinberg needs to contact the agents/AUSAs directly.
EFTA00020174.pdf
This document is an email thread from August 14, 2019, four days after Jeffrey Epstein's death, between defense attorneys (Miller, Weinberg) and redacted government officials (likely SDNY prosecutors). The correspondence arranges a conference call to discuss 'potential civil forfeiture issues' and provides the defense team with contact information for the Assistant U.S. Attorneys specifically assigned to investigate Epstein's death. The document highlights the immediate legal shift toward asset forfeiture and the separate investigation into the circumstances of his death.
EFTA00019069.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Martin G. Weinberg to prosecutors and other counsel dated August 12, 2019, two days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. Weinberg requests DNA testing on ligatures and bed stripping found in Epstein's MCC cell and asserts attorney-client privilege regarding emails seized at Teterboro and Epstein's NYC residence. He also inquires if the government intends to dismiss the indictment against Epstein that day.
EFTA00019067.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 10-11, 2019, immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's death. It culminates in a formal letter from attorney Martin Weinberg to government officials and the MCC, requesting the preservation of all evidence related to Epstein's detention, his July 23 suicide attempt, and his death on August 10. Specific requests include video footage, visitor logs, medical records, and notes found in the cell. The chain also includes earlier emails from government officials confirming the initiation of FBI and Attorney General investigations.
EFTA00016596.pdf
A formal response from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Jeffrey Epstein's defense team regarding discovery requests made in July and August 2019. The government rejects defense requests for broad access to files from other districts (FL, GA) and communications with victims as 'outlandishly overbroad' and a 'fishing expedition' to identify victims, while confirming it will comply with standard legal obligations (Rule 16, Brady). The letter asserts the SDNY investigation was independent of the previous Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement.
EFTA00016324.pdf
This document is a Grand Jury Subpoena issued on August 16, 2019, by the Southern District of New York to Experian, requesting credit records for Ghislaine Maxwell related to a sex trafficking investigation (citing statutes 1591, 2422, etc.). The package includes Experian's response, a Declaration of Custodian of Records dated August 27, 2019, and the credit profile itself. The credit report reveals Maxwell's employment with 'J Epstein and Compny,' an alias 'Ghislaine Borgerson,' and various financial accounts including an active AMEX with a balance over $100,000 at the time of the report.
EFTA00014337.pdf
This document is an email chain dated August 14, 2019, four days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. Attorney Martin Weinberg communicates with 'Alex' and mentions 'Mike,' stating they are authorized to discuss 'potential civil forfeiture issues.' The parties agree to a conference call scheduled for the following morning at 9:30.
EFTA00007684.pdf
This document is an invoice from Wood Technology, Inc. dated March 29, 2005. It details the shipment of one 'Ebony CD Storage Tower' sold to CSN Stores, Inc. in Boston but shipped to a redacted recipient at 358 El Brillo Way in Palm Beach, Florida, a property known to be owned by Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes a handwritten date of April 15, 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00000386.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 16, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg of Boston, MA, to be admitted Pro Hac Vice, allowing him to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000364.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to be admitted "Pro Hac Vice," allowing him to practice in this specific case as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity