| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unknown author
|
Citation |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Author (unnamed)
|
Intellectual citation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joseph Weizenbaum
|
Professional debate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
George Church
|
Co contributors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author (Unknown)
|
Citation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author (Unknown)
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed author
|
Intellectual reference |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
James Tagg
|
Intellectual adversary |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown author
|
Intellectual philosophical opponent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author (Narrator)
|
Intellectual disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Intellectual citation |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-02-20 | Flight | Flight from JFK to MRY. | JFK to MRY | View |
This document is a flight log for February and March 2002, primarily for the Boeing 727 with tail number N908JE, which was associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The log, signed by pilot David Rodgers, details numerous domestic and international flights with a variety of high-profile passengers, including Bill Clinton, Naomi Campbell, Glen Dubin, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell. The log also includes records of several simulator training sessions for the pilots.
This document appears to be page 133 from a book or essay included in House Oversight evidence files. The text discusses evolutionary biology, artificial intelligence (AI), and philosophy, arguing that human intelligence is merely a survival mechanism rather than a unique trait. It references philosophers Daniel Dennett and Descartes, and speculates on the future of AI while noting the resilience of bacteria compared to humans. The footnote indicates the text was written after 2017.
This document appears to be page 88 of a philosophical essay or book chapter regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The text contrasts narrow AI (specifically chess engines) with AGI, arguing that true AGI implies creativity, the ability to refuse tasks, and moral agency. The author refutes a quote by Daniel Dennett, arguing that AGI can indeed be punished or held accountable (through resource restriction) and that AGI raised in a decent society is not destined to become an enemy of civilization. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was gathered as evidence, likely related to investigations into Epstein's connections to scientists and the Edge Foundation.
This document appears to be a page (p. 45) from an essay or book, likely authored by philosopher Daniel Dennett (identified via Footnote 10), included as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation. The text discusses the limitations and philosophical implications of Artificial Intelligence, critiquing Joseph Weizenbaum's views on 'Strong AI' and referencing IBM's Watson and George Church. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016848', suggesting it was gathered as evidence, likely related to inquiries into Jeffrey Epstein's funding of scientific research or the Edge Foundation.
This document is a Penguin Press marketing summary for John Brockman's book 'Deep Thinking: Twenty-Five Ways of Looking at AI,' slated for publication on February 19, 2019. The text highlights Brockman's role in assembling prominent scientists and thinkers—such as Steven Pinker, Max Tegmark, and Stephen Wolfram—to discuss the implications of Artificial Intelligence. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp (016804), indicating it was gathered as evidence, likely due to Brockman's known association with Jeffrey Epstein.
This document appears to be page 5 of a proposal outlining the creation of an Artificial Intelligence research 'pilot team.' It details the proposed staff composition (researchers and developers), a list of high-profile potential scientific board members (including Stephen Pinker, Ben Goertzel, and Daniel Dennett), and includes a biographical section for the proposer, Joscha Bach. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was obtained during a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be page xii of a book or manuscript titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'. It contains philosophical and scientific text discussing determinism, free will, human cognition versus computer processing, and the nature of scientific belief, referencing Daniel Dennett and Richard Feynman. The document bears a House Oversight footer, indicating it was collected as evidence, likely during an investigation into scientific funding or associations (potentially related to Epstein's connections to the scientific community).
This document is a single page (Preface, page xi) from a book, marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp (015685). The text is a philosophical discussion by an engineer-author regarding artificial intelligence, consciousness, and free will, referencing works by Roger Penrose, Douglas Hofstadter, and Daniel Dennett. The author argues against determinism and computational theories of mind, citing Andrew Wiles' 1996 proof of Fermat's Last Theorem as evidence of non-algorithmic human creativity.
This document is page 344 of a glossary or bibliography, stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It contains a list of academic citations focused on Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Evolutionary Psychology, ranging from 1962 to 2008. Notable authors listed include Nick Bostrom, Juergen Schmidhuber, and Daniel Dennett, reflecting Epstein's known interest in and funding of scientific research in these fields.
This document is page 260 of a book or manuscript titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?' by James Tagg, stamped with a House Oversight control number. The text discusses philosophical concepts regarding artificial intelligence, the 'Turing limit,' and non-computable art (music and visual puzzles), referencing Roger Penrose and Daniel Dennett. While the content is philosophical, its presence in a House Oversight dump suggests it was likely an attachment or document in possession of a subject under investigation.
This document appears to be page 133 of a book or manuscript, marked as evidence with the stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015823. The text discusses the philosophy and mathematics of creativity and artificial intelligence, referencing Daniel Dennett's theories on idea generation versus assessment. It explores the computational difficulty of generating 'interesting' content (like a Leo Tolstoy novel or a Spike Milligan poem) through random processes or sequential counting.
This document appears to be page 46 of a manuscript or book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?' included in a House Oversight Committee production. The text is a philosophical essay written in the first person by a self-described 'dyslexic engineer.' It explores the nature of human consciousness versus computer processing, the concept of 'qualia,' and references philosopher Daniel Dennett's views on artificial intelligence and machine sentience.
This document is a Penguin Press marketing one-sheet for John Brockman's book 'Deep Thinking: Twenty-Five Ways of Looking at AI,' scheduled for publication on February 19, 2019. It describes the book as a collection of essays from prominent scientists and thinkers (including Stephen Wolfram, Steven Pinker, and Max Tegmark) discussing the future and risks of Artificial Intelligence. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to Brockman's ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 409 of a book index, stamped with the Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016099, indicating it is part of the evidence production in the House Oversight Committee's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The index lists various scientific, mathematical, and philosophical terms and figures, including Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman, Daniel Dennett, and David Deutsch. The content suggests the book is likely a popular science or mathematics text, possibly related to topics of interest to Epstein (physics, AI, intelligence). No direct communications or transactional data are present on this page.
This document page, stamped with a House Oversight identifier, contains a philosophical essay titled 'Free Will Universe.' The text argues against determinism, using Andrew Wiles' mathematical discoveries as evidence of non-computational human thought, while contrasting this view with the deterministic philosophy of Daniel Dennett. It explores the implications of a determined universe modeled as a single algorithm or 'clockwork.'
This document is page 38 of an academic paper or essay discussing the philosophical intersection of religion, science, and humanism. The text contains a 'Conclusion' section arguing for a dialogue between religion and psychological sciences to foster 'religious humanism,' followed by a 'References' section citing various authors including Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Aristotle. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021284', indicating it was processed as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to materials recovered from Jeffrey Epstein given his known interest in funding scientific and evolutionary research.
This document is the first page of Chapter 3, titled "Science, Religion, and a Revived Religious Humanism," authored by Don Browning. It discusses the historical and current dialogue between science and religion, introducing the concept of religious humanism as a productive alternative to both "new atheism" and religious dominance. The text includes a detailed biographical footnote about Don Browning's academic career and publications.
A page from a manuscript or book (page 133) discussing evolutionary biology and artificial intelligence. The text argues that human intelligence is merely a survival mechanism and compares human fragility to the resilience of bacteria, speculating on the future impact of AI. It cites philosopher Daniel Dennett's 2017 book.
Many hours of discussion where the author tried to convince Weizenbaum about the nature of his arguments regarding AI.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity