Joseph Weizenbaum
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
John McCarthy
|
Intellectual disagreement |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
John McCarthy
|
Intellectual debate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bill Hibbard
|
Intellectual disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pamela McCorduck
|
Intellectual disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Daniel Dennett
|
Professional debate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Computer Power and Human Reason
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pamela McCorduck
|
Intellectual debate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pamela McCorduck
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016972.jpg
This document discusses the intersection of emerging artificial intelligence technologies and established human rights frameworks. It explores the ethical challenges of integrating non-human intelligences into society, referencing historical declarations of rights and debating whether machines can or should replace humans in roles requiring dignity and care. The text also touches on the necessity of making ethical decision-making explicit and algorithmic in the age of autonomous systems.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016882.jpg
The text argues against the concept of technological determinism, asserting that political freedom is driven by norms and institutions rather than technology levels. The author uses historical examples to show that repression existed in low-tech eras and that modern high-tech societies often have high degrees of freedom, countering fears of an inevitable "surveillance state."
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016848.jpg
This document appears to be a page (p. 45) from an essay or book, likely authored by philosopher Daniel Dennett (identified via Footnote 10), included as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation. The text discusses the limitations and philosophical implications of Artificial Intelligence, critiquing Joseph Weizenbaum's views on 'Strong AI' and referencing IBM's Watson and George Church. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016848', suggesting it was gathered as evidence, likely related to inquiries into Jeffrey Epstein's funding of scientific research or the Edge Foundation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018421.jpg
This document appears to be page 189 of a manuscript, essay, or book regarding Artificial Intelligence and Transhumanism found within the House Oversight Epstein files. The text discusses the philosophical and technical implications of AI surpassing human intelligence (the Singularity), referencing Alan Turing, deep neural networks, and a 'New Caste' of engineers. It explicitly mentions 'Maes' AI' (likely referring to MIT professor Pattie Maes) and concludes with a reference to Joseph Weizenbaum.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018419.jpg
This document appears to be a page (p. 187) from a book manuscript (Chapter Eleven: Citizens!) included in House Oversight Committee evidence regarding MIT. The text is a narrative describing the author's interactions with Pattie Maes at the MIT Media Lab in the 1990s, discussing the history of Artificial Intelligence, recommendation engines, and the work of Joseph Weizenbaum.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016389.jpg
This document appears to be a page (169) from a manuscript, essay, or book discussing transhumanism, artificial intelligence ethics, and the definition of human rights in the context of 'non-Homo intelligences.' It references historical legal frameworks like the Bill of Rights and the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights, while debating the capacity of machines to make ethical decisions compared to humans. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was part of materials reviewed during a congressional investigation, likely related to scientific funding or associates connected to the Epstein case.
AI capabilities and ethics
Many hours of discussion where the author tried to convince Weizenbaum about the nature of his arguments regarding AI.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity