Advisory Committee
PersonMentions
2
Relationships
5
Events
11
Documents
1
Relationship Network
Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons.
Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count.
Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak).
Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
Event Timeline
Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
5 total relationships
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Cassell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sara
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Cassell
|
Professional disagreement |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The Advisory Committee took up proposed rule changes regarding the CVRA. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-01 | N/A | Advisory Committee meeting where changes to Rule 21(b) were approved. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-04-16 | N/A | Advisory Committee modified its note to Rule 32(i)(4). | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-26 | N/A | Public hearing on rule changes where the author testified. | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2005-12-01 | N/A | Advisory Committee sent a report of proposed changes to the Standing Committee. | Unknown | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Advisory Committee amended Rule 12.2 regarding alibi information disclosure. | Federal System | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Advisory Committee amended Rule 51 regarding evidence rulings. | Federal System | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Advisory Committee amended Rule 32(b)(2) regarding counsel presence during probation interviews. | Federal System | View |
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | Advisory Committee changed Rule 11(a)(2) regarding conditional guilty pleas. | Federal System | View |
| 1975-01-01 | N/A | Enactment of Rule 15 changes | USA | View |
| 0024-10-01 | N/A | Advisory Committee meeting taking up Subcommittee's proposals. | Unknown | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017650.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article authored by David Schoen (who later served as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney). The text critiques the Advisory Committee's failure to include 'victim representatives' in Proposed Rule 60, arguing it contradicts the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The document is stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee, likely relevant to the investigation into the handling of victims' rights in the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement.
Legal review article / house oversight evidence
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
1
Total
1
Unknown
From:
PAUL G. CASSELL
To:
Advisory Committee
Letter regarding victims' rights/rules of evidence
Letter
N/A
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity