| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Advisory Committee
|
Professional disagreement |
5
|
1 |
This document appears to be pages 254 and 255 from a book titled "Filthy Rich," containing a transcript of a deposition or legal testimony. The speaker is being questioned about allegations of suborning perjury against lawyers Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell regarding Virginia Roberts, and discusses a phone conversation with a woman named Rebecca whose last name is in the speaker's notes.
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 45 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It details a disagreement between Judge Cassell and an Advisory Committee regarding whether victims should have the right to be heard during legal proceedings involving case transfers. The text argues that victims' views should be considered to satisfy the 'fairness' mandate of the CVRA. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely written by Paul Cassell, though he is referred to in the third person in one section) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critiques the Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules for acting 'timidly' by not expanding victim rights beyond the strict statutory language of the CVRA. The document contains a footer indicating it was produced by attorney David Schoen (who represented Jeffrey Epstein) to the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of an investigation into the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity