French
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Stockbridge
|
Research collaborators |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal. | Suez Canal | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. French, 904 F.3d 111 | U.S. Court of Appeals for t... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009056.jpg
This is a page from a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 24, 2022. The document argues that Juror No. 50 falsely answered questions during jury selection (voir dire) and requests subpoenas for the juror's emails with alleged victims, witnesses, or other jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00009007.jpg
This document is page vi of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 613), filed on February 24, 2022. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal cases with their citations and the page numbers where they are referenced in the main document. The cases cited span from 1936 to 2018 and involve various parties in different U.S. federal and state courts.
DOJ-OGR-00009747.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, is a request by Ms. Maxwell to the Court for pre-hearing discovery. She asks the court to authorize subpoenas for the communications of Juror No. 50, who is alleged to have answered a question falsely during voir dire. The request seeks emails and other written communications between Juror No. 50 and any alleged victims, witnesses, or other jurors in the case to investigate potential juror misconduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013712.jpg
This document is page 212 of a scientific text focused on biophysics, specifically discussing 'hierarchical scaling functions' versus 'Markovian exponentials' in the context of ion channel gating kinetics and neurobiology. It cites various studies from the late 1970s to 1996 regarding membrane conductances and rat brain chemistry. While the content is purely academic, the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013712' indicates this page was part of a document production to the U.S. House Oversight Committee, likely stemming from investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's extensive funding of and connections to the scientific community.
Extradition of French nationals
A letter submitted in conjunction with the Government's opposition, indicating that the French Code of Criminal Procedure “absolutely prohibits” the extradition of a French national.
Extradition
States generally that French Code of Criminal Procedure prohibits extradition of a French national.
Extradition of Nationals
Asserts that loss of French nationality subsequent to a crime does not affect the rule against extradition of nationals.
Extradition of nationals
Asserts that loss of French nationality subsequent to a criminal act does not affect the rule against extradition of nationals.
Extradition Policy
Stated that the French Code of Criminal Procedure 'absolutely prohibits' the extradition of a French national.
Extradition of Nationals
Confirming France does not extradite its citizens.
Clarification on French Extradition Law regarding Nationals
Explanation that France cannot extradite French nationals (including dual citizens) based on the Code of Criminal Procedure, but asserts jurisdiction to try them in France instead.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity