21-770_Documents%20Pt%202%20of%203.pdf
48.2 MB
Extraction Summary
13
People
9
Organizations
7
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal case filings (memorandums, orders, exhibits, appellate notices)
File Size:
48.2 MB
Summary
This document is a compilation of legal filings from late 2020 to early 2021 concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's repeated attempts to secure release on bail pending her trial for sex trafficking conspiracy. It includes the Government's opposition detailing her flight risk, wealth, and foreign ties (specifically to France and the UK), a victim statement from Annie Farmer, correspondence from the French Ministry of Justice confirming they do not extradite nationals, and Judge Nathan's orders denying bail. The documents highlight Maxwell's offer to renounce her foreign citizenships and pledge significant assets, all of which the Court found insufficient to assure her appearance.
People (13)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Charged with conspiracy to entice minors, sex trafficking, and perjury; denied bail multiple times.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Co-conspirator |
Deceased; alleged to have sexually abused minors with Maxwell's assistance.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
United States District Judge presiding over the case in SDNY; denied bail motions.
|
| Audrey Strauss | Acting United States Attorney |
Representing the Government.
|
| Maurene Comey | Assistant US Attorney |
Prosecutor.
|
| Alison Moe | Assistant US Attorney |
Prosecutor.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | Assistant US Attorney |
Prosecutor.
|
| Mark S. Cohen | Defense Attorney |
Cohen & Gresser LLP.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
|
| Annie Farmer | Victim/Witness |
Submitted a letter opposing bail; identified as a victim in the indictment.
|
| Scott Borgerson | Spouse |
Referred to as 'spouse' in documents; offered to co-sign bond; assets discussed.
|
| William S. Duffey, Jr. | Proposed Asset Monitor |
Retired federal judge proposed by defense to monitor Maxwell's assets if released.
|
| Philippe Jaeglé | Official |
Head of International Criminal Assistance Bureau, French Ministry of Justice.
|
Organizations (9)
Timeline (4 events)
2020-07-02
2020-07-14
Initial Bail Hearing where detention was ordered.
SDNY Court
Judge Nathan
Defense Counsel
Prosecutors
Relationships (3)
Charged with facilitating sexual abuse of minors by Epstein; described as 'partners in crime'.
Addressed in defense motions as spouse; offered to co-sign bond; assets commingled.
Farmer submitted victim impact statement alleging abuse by Maxwell.
Key Quotes (6)
"The defendant poses an extreme flight risk, no condition or combination of conditions can reasonably ensure her appearance in this District."Source
21-770_Documents%20Pt%202%20of%203.pdf
Quote #1
"The defendant played a critical role in the scheme by helping to identify, entice, and groom minor girls to engage in sex acts with Epstein."Source
21-770_Documents%20Pt%202%20of%203.pdf
Quote #2
"France does not extradite its nationals outside the European Union... regardless of the existence of dual citizenship."Source
21-770_Documents%20Pt%202%20of%203.pdf
Quote #3
"I believe that she is a psychopath. Her abuse of me and many other children and young women is evidence of her disregard for and violation of the rights of others. - Annie Farmer"Source
21-770_Documents%20Pt%202%20of%203.pdf
Quote #4
"The defendant’s willingness to renounce her French and UK citizenship does not sufficiently assuage the Court’s concerns regarding the risk of flight."Source
21-770_Documents%20Pt%202%20of%203.pdf
Quote #5
"The Court concludes that the Defendant poses a risk of flight and that no combination of conditions could ensure her appearance."Source
21-770_Documents%20Pt%202%20of%203.pdf
Quote #6
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,803 characters)
Exhibit F
Doc. 100
The Government’s Memorandum in Support to the Defendant’s Renewed
Motion for Release
Case 21-770, Document 20-3, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page1 of 165
Doc. 100
The Government’s Memorandum in Support to the Defendant’s Renewed
Motion for Release
Case 21-770, Document 20-3, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page1 of 165
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :
-v.- : 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, :
Defendant. :
---------------------------------------------------------------x
THE GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION
TO THE DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE
AUDREY STRAUSS
Acting United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
Attorney for the United States of America
Maurene Comey
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Assistant United States Attorneys
- Of Counsel -
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :
-v.- : 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, :
Defendant. :
---------------------------------------------------------------x
THE GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION
TO THE DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE
AUDREY STRAUSS
Acting United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
Attorney for the United States of America
Maurene Comey
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Assistant United States Attorneys
- Of Counsel -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT’S
RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE ......................................................................................... 1
BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 2
APPLICABLE LAW ...................................................................................................................... 6
DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 8
A. The Nature and Circumstances of the Offense ................................................................... 8
B. The Strength of the Evidence .............................................................................................. 9
C. The Characteristics of the Defendant ................................................................................ 12
D. Conditions of Confinement ............................................................................................... 29
CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 33
THE GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT’S
RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE ......................................................................................... 1
BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 2
APPLICABLE LAW ...................................................................................................................... 6
DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 8
A. The Nature and Circumstances of the Offense ................................................................... 8
B. The Strength of the Evidence .............................................................................................. 9
C. The Characteristics of the Defendant ................................................................................ 12
D. Conditions of Confinement ............................................................................................... 29
CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 33
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
[List of legal citations omitted for brevity in this section, but present in document]
[List of legal citations omitted for brevity in this section, but present in document]
THE GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT’S
RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE
The Government respectfully submits this memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s
renewed motion for release on bail, dated December 8, 2020 (the “Renewed Bail Motion”). Five
months ago, after thorough briefing and a nearly two-hour hearing, this Court concluded that the
defendant posed a serious flight risk and that no condition or combination of conditions could
ensure her appearance in court... [Full text continues through all exhibits, including Victim Statement, French MOJ letters, Defense Motions, and Court Orders as presented in the source images...]
RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE
The Government respectfully submits this memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s
renewed motion for release on bail, dated December 8, 2020 (the “Renewed Bail Motion”). Five
months ago, after thorough briefing and a nearly two-hour hearing, this Court concluded that the
defendant posed a serious flight risk and that no condition or combination of conditions could
ensure her appearance in court... [Full text continues through all exhibits, including Victim Statement, French MOJ letters, Defense Motions, and Court Orders as presented in the source images...]
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document