Relationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00009734.jpg
This document is legal filing (Page 42 of 66) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case, filed on March 11, 2022. It argues that Juror No. 50 demonstrated implied bias and lied during voir dire by concealing his history as a sexual abuse victim and his active use of social media (specifically Twitter) during the trial. The filing notes that the juror communicated directly with victim Annie Farmer via Twitter after the trial and framed the verdict as being 'for all the victims.'
DOJ-OGR-00009718.jpg
This legal document presents evidence of potential juror misconduct in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It includes a screenshot of a deleted tweet, allegedly from Juror No. 50, to a witness/victim (@anniefarmer), stating her story was critical to the jury's verdict. The document further alleges that this juror posted about his jury service on Instagram in early January 2022, despite having told the Court during voir dire that he had deleted his account.
DOJ-OGR-00009707.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 642) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. It argues that Juror No. 50 was dishonest about deleting his Instagram account and his ability to be impartial, noting he posted about the trial post-verdict. The defense explains they did not ask follow-up questions during voir dire because the juror denied bias, contrasting this with other jurors who disclosed abuse histories.
DOJ-OGR-00009658.jpg
This document is page 21 of a legal filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated March 1, 2022, and addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan. It consists of a series of questions directed at a juror from the trial, focusing on their reasons for speaking publicly after the verdict. The questions probe the juror's statements to the media, their social media posts revealing their role, and their perspective as a survivor of childhood sexual abuse serving on the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00009653.jpg
This document is page 16 of a court filing (Document 636) from March 1, 2022, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists specific questions directed at a juror regarding their history of sexual abuse, participation in support groups, interactions with a therapist during the trial, and statements made to the media (Instagram and The Independent) about their trauma and stress.
DOJ-OGR-00009559.jpg
This page is from a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely *US v. Maxwell*) denying the Defendant's request to subpoena social media companies for Juror 50's communications. The Court rules that the request is a 'fishing expedition' and procedurally improper under the Stored Communications Act (SCA), which generally prohibits private parties (like the Defendant) from subpoenaing content from providers like Facebook or Instagram; only the Government may do so with a warrant.
DOJ-OGR-00009550.jpg
This document is page 9 of a court filing (Document 620) from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case, dated February 25, 2022. The text discusses a post-trial motion regarding 'Juror 50,' specifically addressing whether the juror lied during voir dire about social media usage. The Court ruled that a hearing is warranted regarding specific questionnaire answers but denied the Defendant's request to probe the juror's social media history, citing that the juror's minimal Twitter usage and explanation for deleting apps were consistent with their testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00014586.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, containing a judge's instructions to a jury. The judge clarifies that only witness answers and admitted exhibits constitute evidence, not lawyers' questions or the judge's own rulings. The document also contains "Instruction No. 3," which strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone using any electronic devices or social media platforms during their deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00005374.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005336.jpg
This document is page 14 of a juror questionnaire from legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The questionnaire probes a potential juror's media consumption habits, social media usage, viewership of crime-related content, and their opinion on the trustworthiness of the media.
DOJ-OGR-00005320.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on October 22, 2021, containing instructions to the jury pool. The text outlines strict prohibitions against jurors discussing the case on social media or conducting independent research via Google or news outlets. It also details privacy and safety measures due to the 'high-profile' nature of the case and COVID-19, including the use of juror numbers instead of names and the provision of daily transportation for jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00008714.jpg
This document is a legal instruction (Instruction No. 3) for a jury in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 19, 2021. It strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone or conducting outside research using any electronic devices, the internet, or social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. The instruction emphasizes that jurors must base their verdict solely on evidence presented in the courtroom and may only discuss the case with fellow jurors in the jury room during deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00011686.jpg
This document is page 21 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It contains instructions from the Judge to the jury regarding their conduct, specifically forbidding them from discussing the case with one another or outside parties until deliberations begin. The text explicitly lists various communication technologies and social media platforms (Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, etc.) that jurors are prohibited from using to discuss the trial.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019525.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book proof (likely by Edward Jay Epstein regarding Edward Snowden, given the filename 'Epst' and context) produced to the House Oversight Committee. It details Edward Snowden moving into a rental home in Waipahu, Hawaii, on April 2, 2012, and mentions a social media post by his girlfriend, Lindsay Mills, regarding their temporary separation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019522.jpg
This document is page 34 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (authored by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the ISBN in the footer), bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. It details Edward Snowden's life while working for Dell in Annapolis, his relationship with Lindsay Mills, and his growing disillusionment with the US intelligence community (NSA/CIA/DIA) prior to his defection to Moscow. It mentions his attendance at a gala with former CIA director Michael Hayden and his alleged complaints to NSA officials regarding surveillance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031546.jpg
A mobile screenshot of Donald J. Trump's Twitter profile and a thread of three tweets commonly referred to as the 'stable genius' tweets. In the thread, Trump denies Russian collusion, attacks Democrats and the media, compares his political success to Hillary Clinton's failure, and defends his mental state by calling himself 'like, really smart' and a 'very stable genius.' The document contains a footer indicating it is part of House Oversight Committee records (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031546).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020647.jpg
This document, labeled Appendix 3 (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020647), outlines the social media presence and ownership structures of PRC-funded and PRC-controlled media outlets operating in the United States. It provides statistical data on social media followers for major Chinese state media and details the corporate relationships linking US-based outlets like SinoVision and Sky Link TV back to the Chinese state via the Overseas Chinese Affairs Office and other entities. There is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, flight logs, or specific individuals in this document.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016958.jpg
This document appears to be a page (155) from a book or academic text regarding Artificial Intelligence, specifically comparing bottom-up systems (like AlphaZero) with Top-down Bayesian Models. It discusses the challenges of computer vision compared to human learning and cites research by Brenden Lake (NYU), Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Joshua B. Tenenbaum published in 2015. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to scientific funding or research connections (common in the context of Epstein's ties to academia/MIT), though Epstein is not mentioned on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028989.jpg
This document appears to be a presentation slide describing a software platform called 'InsightsPod' used for social media sentiment analysis. It displays logos for major social networks and text outlining current and future platform integrations. The document bears a Bates stamp indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee investigation (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028989).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025339.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a larger production to the House Oversight Committee, identified by the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025339. The content consists of web article snippets or a news feed layout, featuring a National Geographic blurb about the summer solstice by Michael Greshko and a headline about an Instagram community known as 'Planner Addicts.' The content appears to be incidental web browsing data or a capture of a news feed, with no direct text references to Jeffrey Epstein or criminal activity on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024842.jpg
This document is page 26 of a market research report titled 'Cowen Collaborative Insights' dated February 25, 2019. It analyzes the CBD and Hemp industry through the lens of Instagram metrics (followers, posts, likes) for January 2019, comparing emerging brands like CBDFX and Lord Jones against established public companies. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024842' stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation (potentially related to financial probes involving Epstein or Deutsche Bank), the content itself is strictly commercial market analysis with no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018392.jpg
This document appears to be page 160 of a book or report included in a House Oversight investigation file (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018392). The text discusses the economic theories of 'Arthur' (likely W. Brian Arthur) regarding 'network effects' and 'increasing returns' in the technology sector. It analyzes the monopolistic dominance of companies like Microsoft, Google, and Facebook, noting how user adoption creates a lock-in effect that stifles competition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030295.jpg
This document is an email chain from January 10-11, 2015, forwarded by Ghislaine Maxwell to an account likely belonging to Jeffrey Epstein. The emails show Maxwell's associates, Philip Barden and 'Ross', urgently discussing how to respond to public allegations, including reports that 'G' (Ghislaine) engaged in 'direct abuse'. They argue against silence, calling it 'reputational suicide' and noting that 'JE is already toast', pushing for a 'cogent denial' before an anticipated article by 'Dershowitz' is published.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022465.jpg
This document is a screenshot of a snippet from a Vox.com article written by Kaitlyn Tiffany. The article discusses an Instagram post by a person named Kimberly Matte with the caption "suns out, guns out, buns out,". The document is labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022465', but its content does not contain any apparent connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022464.jpg
This document is an email sent from the news aggregator Flipboard to the email address "jeevacation@gmail.com", an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein, on June 19, 2019. The email is a standard newsletter, and its subject and featured article title is "The hired guns of Instagram". The document is marked with the Bates number "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022464", indicating it is part of a collection from the House Oversight Committee.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity