DeepMind
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Google
|
Corporate acquisition |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
AlphaGo
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Google
|
Acquirer acquired |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Google
|
Acquisition |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
Google
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Google
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OpenAI
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Acquisition of DeepMind by Google for '500M'. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acquisition of DeepMind by Google. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Google acquired the AI company DeepMind for 500M. | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016981.jpg
This document appears to be a page (178) from an academic essay or book regarding the history and philosophy of Artificial Intelligence and its intersection with Art. It references the foundational 1955 AI proposal by McCarthy and Marvin Minsky (a known Epstein associate), discusses Google DeepMind, and analyzes artistic works by Philippe Parreno and mathematical models by John Horton Conway. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to the inquiry into MIT Media Lab's funding and Minsky's ties to Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016957.jpg
This document is page 154 of a book or article discussing the history and mechanics of Artificial Intelligence, specifically focusing on 'Bottom-up Deep Learning' and 'Reinforcement Learning.' It traces the history from B.F. Skinner's work in the 1950s to modern applications by Google's DeepMind (such as AlphaZero). While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production (potentially related to Jeffrey Epstein's scientific interests or funding), the text itself is purely scientific/academic and contains no direct reference to Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016878.jpg
This document appears to be a page (likely page 75 based on the footer) from a book or manifesto regarding Artificial Intelligence safety and the future of humanity. The author expresses optimism about the growing awareness of 'AI-risk' among researchers and global elites, citing organizations like OpenAI, Google Brain, and the OECD. The page bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was included in evidence regarding investigations into ties between scientific/academic figures and Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027210.jpg
This document is a forensic log of messages from March 2017 between a redacted individual and 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known Jeffrey Epstein alias). The conversation covers scheduling logistics for NYC, notes that 'BG' (likely Bill Gates) will be in D.C., suggests BG meet with Tom Barrack for 'traction,' and inquires about the status of a deal involving Jack Ma.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025964.jpg
This document is a page from a correspondence (likely an email found in the House Oversight production) discussing the intersection of neuroscience, artificial intelligence, and linguistics. It references Google's DeepMind acquisition, specific machine learning milestones from 2015, and Noam Chomsky's linguistic theories, while also forwarding a controversial hypothesis linking race, motor development, and IQ. The document includes Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025964.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025958.jpg
This document is a page from an email written by 'Joscha' (likely cognitive scientist Joscha Bach) discussing the state of Artificial Intelligence and machine learning. The text covers topics such as universal cortical learning, Google's image recognition errors, DeepMind's reinforcement learning in Atari games, and criticisms of Noam Chomsky's linguistic theories. The author also references their own presentation at a NIPS workshop regarding 'request-confirmation networks' and makes a controversial claim correlating race, motor development, and IQ.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025952.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a correspondence (likely between Jeffrey Epstein and a scientific contact) discussing evolutionary psychology and artificial intelligence. The text compares human and gorilla cognitive development, theorizes about the origins of language, and discusses advancements in machine learning by Google and DeepMind. It includes a controversial statement linking race, motor development, and IQ, and references 'Noam' (likely Chomsky).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016398.jpg
This text critiques the evolution of artificial intelligence from a theoretical simulation to a tool of capitalism and social control, contrasting these developments with artistic interpretations. It discusses the work of artist Philippe Parreno and mathematician John Horton Conway, exploring the boundaries between simulation and life through the lens of Conway's "Game of Life" and its implications for understanding complexity and consciousness.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016374.jpg
This document discusses the history and mechanics of AI learning methods, specifically focusing on "bottom-up deep learning" and "reinforcement learning." It references historical figures like B.F. Skinner and modern achievements by Google's DeepMind, such as AlphaZero and Atari game playing, to illustrate how computers detect patterns and learn through reward systems.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016349.jpg
This document discusses the rapid advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI), specifically deep learning programs like AlphaGo and AlphaZero, and their applications beyond games into fields like medicine and transportation. It also warns of the risks associated with AI, including data privacy concerns, the perpetuation of social biases, the reinforcing of echo chambers by algorithms, and the growing unchecked power of multinational technology companies controlling user data.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026417.jpg
This document compares the prolonged developmental period in humans to that of gorillas, suggesting the extended learning phase allows for greater cognitive abstraction. It discusses the role of motivation and reward systems in learning, drawing parallels to machine learning advancements like Google's image recognition and DeepMind's Atari-playing AI. The text concludes by noting the limitations of current AI models and referencing Noam Chomsky's criticism of machine translation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026410.jpg
This document is an essay comparing human and animal learning with contemporary machine learning, referencing Google, DeepMind, and AI research from circa 2015. The author discusses theories on intelligence, including a controversial hypothesis linking race, motor development, and IQ. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026410' suggests it is an exhibit from a congressional investigation, but the text contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals, locations, or events.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026403.jpg
This document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026403', is a highly technical discussion about artificial intelligence, machine learning, and cognitive science. The author discusses theories of language, Google's AI programs, the acquisition of DeepMind, and their own research presented at a NIPS workshop. Despite the user's framing, the document's content does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or any known related individuals, places, or events.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026397.jpg
This document is an email from an individual named Joscha to an unnamed recipient, discussing advanced topics in artificial intelligence and machine learning, referencing Google, DeepMind, and Noam Chomsky. A legal disclaimer at the bottom indicates the communication is the property of 'JEE' (likely Jeffrey E. Epstein) and provides a contact email, 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026397' suggests the document is from a collection related to a U.S. House of Representatives investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity