Urena
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-22 | N/A | 2 inmates (Rosa, Urena) escorted from GN to ZA. Contraband found: Phone charger, cable, sharpened... | MCC New York (GN to ZA) | View |
| 2013-01-01 | Legal case | Citation for United States v. Urena, 989 F. Supp. 2d 253 | S.D.N.Y. | View |
EFTA00034718.pdf
This document is a Daily Activity Report from the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York dated July 25, 2019, covering activities from the previous day. It explicitly states that inmate Jeffrey Epstein (#76318-054) was on suicide watch with an inmate companion. The report also highlights operational issues, including broken doors/gates, a 'Fire Watch' in progress, and a shortage of staff that forced the vacating of a correctional assignment in the Special Housing Unit (SHU #4).
EFTA00034077.pdf
These documents are the Daily Lieutenant's Logs from the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York for July 22 and July 24, 2019. They detail the status of Jeffrey Epstein (Inmate #76318-054), noting his placement on Suicide Watch with an inmate companion and his subsequent removal to 'Psych obs' on July 24 at 11:10 AM. The logs also repeatedly note critical infrastructure failures, specifically that the fire alarm and sprinkler systems were inoperable/nonoperational requiring a 'Fire Watch,' and that control panels for main doors were inoperative.
EFTA00034073.pdf
This is a Daily Activity Report from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York dated July 25, 2019, covering activities for the previous day. Crucially, it documents that Jeffrey Epstein (Inmate #76318-054) was on 'Suicide Watch w/inmate companion' at this time. The report also highlights significant operational issues, including 9 staff members listed as AWOL, a staff shortage causing SHU #4 to be vacated, and inoperative fire doors necessitating a 'Fire Watch.'
DOJ-OGR-00001799.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated October 14, 2020, from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Everdell argues against the government's request to delay the disclosure of evidence to his client, Ms. Maxwell, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. He asserts the government has not provided sufficient legal justification, such as risks to an ongoing investigation or witness safety, and asks the court to order the immediate production of the materials to the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00022099.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 36) from June 9, 2020, associated with Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text outlines legal standards associated with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 regarding discovery obligations, specifically defining 'materiality' of evidence and what constitutes government 'possession, custody, or control.' It relies on legal precedents such as US v. Ulbricht, US v. Abdalla, and US v. Stein to argue the scope of evidence the government must produce.
DOJ-OGR-00003077.jpg
This document is page 143 of a legal filing by the Government in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on April 16, 2021. The text argues against granting the defendant an evidentiary hearing regarding a 'Franks' analysis and asserts that the defendant failed to meet the burden of proof to obtain discovery or dismiss perjury counts. The Government contends that a jury should decide whether the defendant committed perjury during two depositions in a prior civil matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002984.jpg
This document is page 23 of a government filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing against her motions to dismiss. The prosecution asserts that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) from the Southern District of Florida does not apply to the current indictment or district, and denies her request for discovery due to lack of evidence. Furthermore, the document argues that the indictment is timely under 18 U.S.C. ยง 3283 because the statute allows prosecution for child sexual abuse offenses as long as the victims are alive, rejecting Maxwell's argument that the statute applies only prospectively.
DOJ-OGR-00002958.jpg
This document is page 24 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 204) filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities listing numerous legal cases, primarily with the United States as the plaintiff, along with their full legal citations and the page numbers where they are referenced in the main document. The cases cited are from various federal courts and span several decades, serving as legal precedent for the arguments made in the filing.
DOJ-OGR-00005559.jpg
This legal document is a page from a government motion arguing against publicizing the full names of four minor victims in an upcoming criminal trial. The government contends that the defense has not shown a specific need for this disclosure, and that the court should prioritize the victims' privacy and dignity. The motion cites several legal precedents that support protecting witnesses' identities, especially when safety and privacy are concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00005399.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. It discusses legal standards and Second Circuit precedents regarding the protection of witness identities versus a defendant's right to cross-examination. The text cites various cases (Marcus, Marti, Urena, Cavallaro) to support the argument that courts must balance witness safety against the defense's need for information, particularly in cases involving sex trafficking or safety risks.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity