| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
IBM
|
Accomplice defender |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
IBM
|
Defense accomplice |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-05-11 | N/A | Complaint filed: McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther. | DC Superior Court | View |
| 2011-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Complaint: McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther | DC Superior Court | View |
| 2011-05-04 | N/A | Court testimony where Gunthers allegedly lied about relationships | Court | View |
| 2011-04-06 | N/A | Issuance of Temporary Restraining Order against Nadine McGuire | DC Superior Court | View |
| 2011-04-06 | N/A | Gunthers executed Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction against McGuire; TRO issued. | DC Superior Court | View |
| 2011-04-01 | N/A | Superior Court filing for a Protection Order by John and Avery Gunther. | Superior Court (DC Area imp... | View |
| 2011-04-01 | N/A | Superior Court filing for a Protection Order | Superior Court | View |
The document appears to be a composite of notes or a draft correspondence from a House Oversight file (stamped 017599). It begins by detailing a legal complaint (McGuire v. IBM) alleging a cover-up and child exploitation involving the Gunther family and IBM, before transitioning into a letter addressed to the Washington Post criticizing Kenneth Starr. The author attacks Starr's credibility by highlighting his legal representation of Blackwater regarding the Fallujah ambush and his role as attorney for 'convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.'
This document appears to be a narrative statement or correspondence submitted to the House Oversight Committee by Grace Nadine McGuire. It details allegations of a conspiracy involving IBM executives (Palmisano, Skoog), her former employers (the Gunthers), and her own mother to sabotage her pregnancy in 2007 and destroy her credibility through legal battles in 2011. The text quotes extensively from two specific lawsuits: 'McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther' (DC Superior Court) and 'McGuire v. IBM' (US District Court of Virginia).
This document appears to be part of a larger correspondence or 'whistleblower' narrative submitted to House Oversight. It details allegations by Nadine McGuire regarding a conspiracy involving IBM, the NSF, and her own family (the Gunthers and her mother), claiming they colluded to sabotage her pregnancy in 2007 and destroy her credibility. The text mixes legal citations from 2011 lawsuits with geopolitical commentary linking 9/11, DHS, and the election of Emmanuel Macron (dating the writing to post-2017).
This document appears to be a page from a larger submission to the House Oversight Committee (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015011). It contains allegations against John and Avery Gunther regarding a cover-up for IBM and abuse of their children, alongside complaints about the NSF and the 'Deep State.' The second half of the document is a letter to the Washington Post criticizing Kenneth Starr for his representation of Blackwater and Jeffrey Epstein, while questioning the focus of the original Starr Report.
This document appears to be a narrative or submission by Nadine McGuire summarizing two legal battles involving IBM and the Gunther family. McGuire alleges that the Gunthers accepted payment from IBM to destroy her credibility and file a restraining order against her, while simultaneously alleging in a separate federal suit that IBM executives and her own mother (Pauline Scala McGuire) were responsible for an assault that caused the death of her unborn child in 2007. The page contains excerpts from complaints filed in DC Superior Court and the US District Court of Virginia in May 2011.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity