HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015010.jpg
2.57 MB
Extraction Summary
11
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
5
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document excerpt / narrative statement / house oversight production
File Size:
2.57 MB
Summary
This document appears to be a narrative or submission by Nadine McGuire summarizing two legal battles involving IBM and the Gunther family. McGuire alleges that the Gunthers accepted payment from IBM to destroy her credibility and file a restraining order against her, while simultaneously alleging in a separate federal suit that IBM executives and her own mother (Pauline Scala McGuire) were responsible for an assault that caused the death of her unborn child in 2007. The page contains excerpts from complaints filed in DC Superior Court and the US District Court of Virginia in May 2011.
People (11)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Grace Nadine McGuire | Plaintiff/Author |
Alleging sabotage by IBM and the Gunthers; alleges assault leading to death of unborn child.
|
| John Gunther | Defendant |
Accused of quid pro quo with IBM to destroy McGuire's credibility.
|
| Avery Gunther | Defendant |
Accused of quid pro quo with IBM to destroy McGuire's credibility.
|
| AFG | Child |
Child of the Gunthers (initials used).
|
| XWG | Child |
Child of the Gunthers (initials used).
|
| Pauline Scala McGuire | Defendant/Mother |
Nadine's mother, accused of colluding with the Gunthers and IBM.
|
| Gregory Jackson | Judge |
Presiding judge, DC Superior Court.
|
| Palmisano | Defendant |
Accused of conduct leading to pregnancy termination (likely referencing Samuel Palmisano, IBM exec).
|
| Skoog | Defendant |
Accused of coordinating drug administration leading to pregnancy termination.
|
| Susan Horton | Defendant |
Accused of coordinating drug administration leading to pregnancy termination.
|
| Leonie Brinkema | Judge |
Presiding judge, US District Court of Virginia.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| IBM |
Defendant in civil suit; alleged to have compensated Gunthers to destroy McGuire's credibility.
|
|
| EEOC |
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; recipient of 2010 charge by McGuire.
|
|
| DC Superior Court |
Venue for McGuire v. Gunther.
|
|
| US District Court of Virginia |
Venue for McGuire v. IBM (Eastern Division, Alexandria).
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015010'.
|
Timeline (5 events)
April 22, 2007
Death of Nadine McGuire's son/termination of pregnancy alleged to be caused by defendants.
Unknown (Medical context implied)
April 6, 2011
Gunthers executed Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction against McGuire; TRO issued.
DC Superior Court
May 11, 2011
Complaint filed: McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther.
DC Superior Court
May 16, 2011
Complaint filed: McGuire v. IBM, et al.
US District Court of Virginia
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (3)
Nadine McGuire
→
Former babysitter / Legal Adversaries
→
John and Avery Gunther
Text states 'whose children I used to babysit' and details litigation between them.
Alleged 'quid pro quo exchange... on behalf of IBM'.
Identified as 'plaintiff's mother' and 'colluding with persons against whom Ms. Nadine McGuire is currently furthering litigation'.
Key Quotes (4)
"John and Avery Gunther... agreed to a quid pro quo exchange of financial compensation for help destroying my credibility on behalf of IBM"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015010.jpg
Quote #1
"Mr. and Mrs Gunther, with uncontrolled greed and total disregard for the rights and feelings of Ms. Nadine McGuire... maliciously and with ill-intent, wrongfully completed and executed a Complaint"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015010.jpg
Quote #2
"Defendant Palmisano's conduct in ascertaining the drug that was used on the plaintiff to end her pregnancy and take the life of her child... constitutes an intentional touching"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015010.jpg
Quote #3
"severe placental abruption, which terminated her pregnancy and ended the life of her unborn child"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015010.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,479 characters)
sabotaged. The story of this sabotage and what followed is (briefly) this:
I've long-alleged that John and Avery Gunther (whose children I used to babysit) agreed to a quid pro quo exchange of financial compensation for help destroying my credibility on behalf of IBM against whom I'd filed a 2010 EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) charge and a subsequent May 2011 civil suit.
Per the May 11, 2011 Complaint, McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther:
3. On April 6, 2011 Mr. and Mrs Gunther, with uncontrolled greed and total disregard for the rights and feelings of Ms. Nadine McGuire as well as those of their children, AFG and XWG, maliciously and with ill-intent, wrongfully completed and executed a Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction requesting formal protection against Ms. Nadine McGuire.
4. Over the course of the previous few months, Mr. and Mrs. Gunther, colluding with persons against whom Ms. Nadine McGuire is currently furthering litigation, including but not limited to plaintiff's mother, Pauline Scala McGuire, and from whom they received and/or have been promised to receive monetary incentives, hid their relationships with said individuals, further lied about having those relationships in direct conversation with Ms. Nadine McGuire and Court testimony on May 4, 2011, and wrongfully completed and executed a Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction against Ms. Nadine McGuire in cooperation with said persons, resulting in the issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order against Ms. Nadine McGuire issued on April 6, 2011.
- Initial Complaint, 5/11/11, McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther, Case No.:2011 CA 003703 B, DC Superior Court, Judge Gregory Jackson presiding
In regards to the suit against IBM (McGuire v. IBM, 1:11CV528, US District Court of Virginia), the only suit in which Pauline Scala McGuire was listed as a defendant, the most important claim was one of “assault” that led to the 2007 death of my son. Per the filing:
Plaintiff, Grace Nadine McGuire, realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-65 hereof as if fully set forth within and further alleges:
66. Defendant Palmisano's conduct in ascertaining the drug that was used on the plaintiff to end her pregnancy and take the life of her child on April 22, 2007, constitutes an intentional touching of the plaintiff by defendant Palmisano, and was undertaken deliberately and with actual malice towards the plaintiff and her unborn child.
67. Defendant Skoog, Susan Horton and Scala's conduct in coordinating the circumstances, creating physical proximity and the administering of the drug to the plaintiff that ended her pregnancy and took the life of her child on April 22, 2007 constituted an intentional touching of the plaintiff by said defendants, and was undertaken deliberately and with actual malice towards the plaintiff and her unborn child.
... 69. As the direct and proximate result of defendant Palmisano, Skoog, Susan Horton, and Scala's conduct, the plaintiff suffered a severe placental abruption, which terminated her pregnancy and ended the life of her unborn child, causing the plaintiff to suffer damages including but not limited to the loss of her child, loss of affection, grief, sorrow, extreme mental torment and emotional distress.
- Initial Complaint, filed 5/16/11, McGuire v. IBM, et al, Case No.: 1:11CV528, US District Court of Virginia - Eastern Division, Alexandria, Judge Leonie Brinkema presiding
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015010
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document