FBI
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
SDNY
|
Professional investigative |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Inter agency cooperation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Investigative cooperation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Investigation subject |
2
|
2 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Investigative collaboration |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
PBPD
|
Investigative cooperation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein Victim Compensation Fund
|
Proposed service provider |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Cooperation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Surveillance monitoring |
2
|
2 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional investigative |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
CINGULAR WIRELESS
|
Investigative |
2
|
2 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Joint investigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Interagency cooperation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Investigator evidence source |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Prosecution evidence custodian |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Team (Redacted)
|
Coordination evidence transfer |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SDNY Prosecutors
|
Professional tension |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
NYPD
|
Joint task force cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
OCME
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal/Review Team (Redacted)
|
Data provider |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Professional conflict |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
USANYS Staff
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional law enforcement |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | OPR working with FBI Palm Beach Office, including case agents and Victim Witness Specialist, to o... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI search of Automated Case Support system and documentation of victim notification system. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Meeting | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation began, contemporaneous with news reports of Epstein's arrest. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims provided OPR with information regarding their contacts with the FBI and USAO. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rothstein's firm was raided. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI produced a criminal complaint related to Alfredo Rodriguez. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell ('green lighting ab arrest'). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Launch of counterintelligence investigation into Trump campaign | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense counsel review of nude images | FBI | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI interview of a victim pursuant to a federal investigation regarding the sexual exploitation o... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Epstein investigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transfer of evidence | New York Office (NYO) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Criminal Investigation / Agency Interviews | MCC New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search of Epstein's island | Little St. James | View |
| N/A | N/A | Seizure of images from Jeffrey Epstein's residences pursuant to search warrants. | New York and Virgin Islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned Arrest upon return to US | Unspecified Airport | View |
| N/A | N/A | Closure of federal investigations by FBI and U.S. Attorney | Federal jurisdiction | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Raid / Evidence Collection | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Identification of new victims | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government interviews with accusers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the case/Investigation | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Referral of case to FBI | Palm Beach | View |
DOJ-OGR-00023264.tif
This document details an interview with Villafaña regarding her interactions with victims in a case involving Epstein. It describes her communications about a non-prosecution agreement, the victims' concerns about the legal process and potential exaggeration of claims, and her rationale for not discussing the agreement with some victims. It also includes statements from a CEOS Trial Attorney and an FBI agent about victim notifications and interviews.
DOJ-OGR-00023263.tif
This document details FBI interviews of Jeffrey Epstein's victims in early 2008, focusing on victim Wild's willingness to testify and confusion regarding the case's status. It also describes the emotional distress of other victims and communications between officials like Villafaña, Acosta, and Sloman regarding victim management and the difficulties of prosecution. The text references contemporary news articles about the case and highlights discrepancies in FBI reporting of victim interviews.
DOJ-OGR-00023262.tif
This document details the efforts of FBI agent Villafaña, the FBI, and a CEOS Trial Attorney in organizing the case against Epstein and interviewing victims between January and May 2008. It describes an attorney's attempt to file civil litigation against Epstein and the reporting of a $50 million civil suit and an anticipated plea deal by the New York Post. The document also notes that the FBI and prosecutors interviewed additional victims and that an FBI report indicates a victim's belief that Epstein should be prosecuted.
DOJ-OGR-00023254.tif
This document excerpt details legal arguments and communications surrounding victim notification in the Epstein case in late 2007. It highlights disagreements between legal representatives (Starr, Lefkowitz) and the USAO (Acosta, Villafaña) regarding victim status, notification requirements, and the appropriate compensation mechanisms, with a specific focus on an individual referred to as 'Jane Doe #2' whose attorney was paid by Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00023253.tif
This document details events from December 2007 concerning victim notification letters related to Jeffrey Epstein's case. Villafaña prepared letters for victims but was instructed by Sloman to hold them after the USAO, via Sanchez, requested a delay due to Epstein's upcoming plea hearing and concerns about potential impeachment of victims for monetary compensation. The document also highlights an FBI agent's concern about unnotified victims and the defense's involvement in drafting letters, as well as Villafaña's later contact with an attorney representing a victim known as Jane Doe #2.
DOJ-OGR-00023251.tif
This document details communications and disagreements among legal parties regarding victim notification practices and the timing of Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing in late 2007. Key figures like Sloman, Villafaña, Lefkowitz, Acosta, Starr, and Fisher are involved in discussions concerning the Justice for All Act, the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the proper procedure for informing victims of the case's developments, including objections from defense counsel and directives from prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00023248.tif
This document is page 210 of a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal deliberations and external pressure regarding victim notification in the Epstein case during October 2007. It highlights defense attorney Lefkowitz's aggressive efforts to prevent the government from notifying victims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), arguing it would violate confidentiality. It also details an internal ethics consultation where a Professional Responsibility Officer advised prosecutors to stop notifying victims if they were concerned about impeachment material.
DOJ-OGR-00023246.tif
This document details the process of informing victims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in the Epstein case, including differing accounts of those communications. It highlights Villafaña's role in directing victim notifications and the USAO's confidentiality clause. News reports from October 2007 confirm Epstein's plea deal for state charges and the federal agreement to drop its probe, with victim Courtney Wild providing a contrasting recollection of the information she received.
DOJ-OGR-00023245.tif
This document details communications and events in September-October 2007 concerning the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and informing victims. Key figures like Villafaña, Lefkowitz, Acosta, and Lourie discuss preventing the NPA from becoming public, managing information disclosure to victims, and coordinating legal representation for the victims to recover damages from Epstein. There is a clear effort to control the narrative and information flow regarding the NPA and its implications for the victims.
DOJ-OGR-00023239.tif
This document details how case agents and an individual named Villafaña solicited victims' opinions on resolving the federal investigation into Epstein. It highlights that victims had varied desires, including some wanting a plea deal, some opposing prosecution, and others wanting jail time, while many expressed concerns about privacy, safety, and the impact of public disclosure on their relationships. The document also notes that Villafaña's records and memory of these interactions were sometimes insufficient for OPR to fully assess the discussions.
DOJ-OGR-00023237.tif
This document details Villafaña's process for victim notification in an unspecified case, where she created her own letters and directed FBI agents to deliver them, believing it provided more assistance than legally required. It highlights that these letters were not reviewed by supervisors and that the USAO's Victim Witness Specialist had no direct contact with victims in the Epstein matter, despite Villafaña's claim of having shown the letter to a specialist who approved it. The document also touches upon the USAO's lack of standardized victim notification procedures and the context of Epstein-related CVRA litigation in July 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00023236.tif
This document excerpt details the victim notification processes during the Epstein investigation, specifically focusing on the actions of an individual named Villafaña and the FBI. It highlights discrepancies and lack of uniformity in victim notification, with Villafaña preparing her own introductory letters to victims while the FBI also sent letters, often without Villafaña's direct knowledge or review, prior to Epstein's guilty plea in 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00023233.tif
This document describes the Automated Victim Notification System (VNS) used by the FBI and USAO to manage victim contacts in criminal cases, including during the Epstein investigation. It details the types of notifications generated and references a 2008 audit report highlighting issues with VNS templates and confusing notifications. The document also clarifies the roles of 'Victim Specialist' (FBI) and 'Victim Witness Specialist' (USAO).
DOJ-OGR-00023232.tif
This document outlines victim/witness notification practices by the USAO and FBI during the Epstein investigation, focusing on the application of the 2005 Guidelines. It details the responsibilities of U.S. Attorneys to notify crime victims of case events and decisions, and describes training efforts led by U.S. Attorney Acosta to ensure compliance with these guidelines.
DOJ-OGR-00023225.tif
This document is an excerpt from a report analyzing the handling of a case involving Epstein, focusing on decisions made by U.S. Attorney Acosta. It critiques Acosta's judgment and the flawed decision-making process that led to a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), which allowed Epstein to manipulate the system to his benefit and left victims and the public questioning justice. The OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment in his approach to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00023210.tif
This document analyzes R. Alexander Acosta's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution, critiquing his use and interpretation of the Petite policy. It details Acosta's reasoning for federal non-intervention, his view on the state's role, and his concessions during an OPR interview that the outcome was not an appropriate punishment. The text also references the Ashcroft Memo and mentions an estimated sentencing range for Epstein by Villafaña.
DOJ-OGR-00023207.tif
This document details an OPR investigation finding no evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was a cooperating witness or 'intelligence asset' in federal matters. It concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving a federal investigation against Epstein through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), which allowed Epstein to manipulate his sentence conditions and lacked sufficient federal oversight. The document also references media reports and internal discussions concerning rumors of Epstein's cooperation.
DOJ-OGR-00018338.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 6, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number (20 CR 330), the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense. The document also notes other individuals present, including representatives from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00018224.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. Witness Mr. Parkinson testifies about an event around 2006 where his office personnel formed a human chain to transfer evidence to an FBI agent. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) then introduces Government Exhibits 264-268, which Parkinson identifies as photos depicting the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way (Epstein's Palm Beach residence) as it appeared on October 20, 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00018121.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, discussing the evidence gathered during a July 2019 FBI search of Mr. Epstein's Manhattan townhouse. An attorney outlines the government's plan to introduce photographs via FBI agent Maguire and notes an agreement has been reached not to introduce certain hard drives and CDs as physical evidence. The discussion also mentions other physical items found, such as costumes and a massage table.
DOJ-OGR-00018102.jpg
This document is the cover page of the official court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 3, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the appearances of the legal teams for both the prosecution (led by Damian Williams) and the defense (including Haddon Morgan and Foreman attorneys), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00017874.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 CR 330 (AJN). The proceedings took place on December 2, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
DOJ-OGR-00017839.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Matt. He recounts a conversation with 'Jane' in which she revealed that the 'godfather' helping pay her and her family's bills was Jeffrey Epstein. The testimony is interrupted by an objection from the Court requiring a more specific question regarding when Jane met Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00017799.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the redirect examination of a witness identified as 'Jane' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor questions Jane to establish that the government did not coach her testimony, instructing her only to 'tell the truth.' The testimony also clarifies that Jane's prior meetings with the FBI and government covered different aspects of her relationship with Maxwell and Epstein at different times, rather than covering every detail in every single meeting.
DOJ-OGR-00017700.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane' by attorney Ms. Menninger. The testimony focuses on clarifying Jane's memory regarding statements made to the FBI and the government in November 2019 and April 2020. Specifically, Jane confirms reporting that she was abused '90 percent of the time' she traveled with Epstein and Maxwell.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity