This document is page 29 of an address book (likely the Epstein 'Black Book'), bearing Bates stamps GIUFFRE001601 and HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014155. It contains contact information for individuals alphabetically ranging from Grossman to Hamilton, including socialites and business figures like Marjorie Gubelmann, Cornelia Guest, Barbara Guggenheim, and George Hamilton. The entries include residential addresses in New York, London, Los Angeles, and Europe, along with multiple phone numbers for homes, work, and mobile devices.
This document is a page from a contact book (likely Jeffrey Epstein's Black Book) containing alphabetical entries from 'Arellano' to 'Bakhtiar'. It lists names, residential and business addresses (spanning New York, London, Spain, and San Francisco), phone numbers, and email addresses. Notable entries include Viscount William Astor, Jose Aznar of S&S Capital, and various individuals in high-end locations like Park Avenue and Cadogan Square. The document bears Bates stamps indicating it was part of the Giuffre v. Maxwell litigation and House Oversight Committee review.
This document is a screenshot of a New York Times article dated January 15, 2017, titled 'After 'Downton,' Affluent Chinese Seek Butlers.' It discusses the rising trend of butler services in China and interviews trainers Neal Yeh and Christopher Noble. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032435', indicating it was produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to communications involving Jeffrey Epstein or financial institutions, though Epstein is not mentioned in the text of this specific page.
This document is a screenshot of a New York Times digital article dated January 15, 2017, discussing the rise of English-style butlers in China among the affluent. It features quotes from trainers Neal Yeh and Christopher Noble regarding the International Butler Academy China in Chengdu. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032435', indicating it is part of a larger document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation, though the content itself is unrelated to Epstein or criminal activity on its face.
This document appears to be a page from a forwarded political chain email (indicated by the '>' characters) included in House Oversight Committee records (ID: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030240). The text presents a list of U.S. Presidents and the percentage of their cabinet members who had private sector experience, culminating in a criticism of President Obama for having only 8% of his cabinet with such experience. The email argues this lack of business background explains the administration's alleged incompetence.
This document appears to be a page (188) from a book manuscript or investigative report regarding Edward Snowden's defection to Russia. The text analyzes the damage control efforts by the NSA and GCHQ following the breach, Snowden's life in Moscow, and questions his motives for taking specific documents that were never released to journalists. The author mentions making arrangements to travel to Moscow in October 2015 to investigate the circumstances of Snowden's arrival in Russia. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp.
This document, page 105 of a House Oversight report, outlines the history of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, detailing his hacking background, legal troubles in Sweden and the UK, and his eventual asylum in the Ecuador embassy. It introduces Sarah Harrison as his deputy and close associate. The text concludes with Edward Snowden contacting Assange in June 2013 to request assistance in escaping Hong Kong.
This document appears to be page 152 of a historical book or manuscript discussing the history of colonialism, the opium wars in China, and the rise of industrial warfare (specifically the Maxim and Gatling guns). It references historical figures like Lin Zexu, Queen Victoria, Lincoln, and Bismarck. While the text itself is historical non-fiction, the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018384' indicates it was included in a document production for the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of a larger investigation file (possibly related to Jeffrey Epstein's financial records or associates, where such a book or manuscript might have been found in evidence).
This document appears to be a page (169) from a manuscript, essay, or book discussing transhumanism, artificial intelligence ethics, and the definition of human rights in the context of 'non-Homo intelligences.' It references historical legal frameworks like the Bill of Rights and the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights, while debating the capacity of machines to make ethical decisions compared to humans. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was part of materials reviewed during a congressional investigation, likely related to scientific funding or associates connected to the Epstein case.
This document is a March 2011 email chain where Ghislaine Maxwell ('gmax') sends Jeffrey Epstein a new Vanity Fair article about their relationship. Epstein forwards this to an unknown party, and a different unknown party replies to Epstein, praising the article and its author, Vicky Ward, and suggesting it be used for strategic purposes by someone named 'citrick'. The article excerpt details Epstein's past, his associations with Prince Andrew and others, and Maxwell's alleged role as his 'procurer'.
This document is an email sent by Jeffrey Epstein to Martin Weinberg on March 8, 2011, marked as 'Privileged - Redacted'. Epstein forwards a Vanity Fair article published the same day by Vicky Ward, which details the relationship between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, refers to Maxwell as an alleged 'procurer', and revisits Epstein's financial history, past criminal charges, and associations with prominent figures like Prince Andrew and Les Wexner.
This document is an email from Jean Luc Brunel to Jeffrey Epstein on March 8, 2011, with the comment 'This is not bad'. The email is a reply to a forwarded article from Vanity Fair, written by Vicky Ward, titled 'Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance'. The article details Ward's history of reporting on Epstein and Maxwell, their relationship, Epstein's past legal troubles, and the emerging allegations of sexual abuse against him from multiple women.
This document is an email exchange from March 8, 2011, where Jeffrey Epstein forwards a newly published, critical Vanity Fair article about himself and Ghislaine Maxwell to Boris Nikolic. Nikolic replies with supportive messages, expressing dismay at the article, disputing its characterization of Epstein as being 57 and 'socially awkward,' and calling the author an 'idiot'.
This document is a personal account from a journalist, likely named Vicky, describing her interactions with and observations of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. It details their personalities, social circles (including Prince Andrew and Mort Zuckerman), and theorizes that the key to their deep friendship was Epstein 'saving' Ghislaine after the death of her father, Robert Maxwell. The document, bearing a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates number, was likely submitted as evidence to a congressional committee.
This document is an email from Lesley Groff to Jeffrey Epstein on March 8, 2011, acknowledging an article Epstein had forwarded to her. The forwarded content is a Vanity Fair article by Vicky Ward that details the author's interactions with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, discusses their mysterious relationship, and recaps the allegations of sexual misconduct and financial crimes surrounding Epstein and his associates.
This document is an email from 'gmax' to 'J Jep' on March 8, 2011, forwarding a Vanity Fair article by Vicky Ward. The article, titled 'Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance,' details Ward's personal interactions with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, discussing their relationship, Epstein's business connections with figures like Les Wexner and his friendship with Prince Andrew. Ward reflects on the emerging sexual abuse allegations against Epstein and his enigmatic intelligence, which attracted other powerful financiers.
This document is an email chain from March 2011 between Steve Hanson and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein forwards a Vanity Fair article by Vicky Ward detailing his and Ghislaine Maxwell's controversial history, including allegations of procuring young women and Epstein's past jail time. Hanson responds briefly, acknowledging the email and suggesting a phone call.
This document is an email chain from March 8, 2011, where Eva Dubin praises Jeffrey Epstein for a Vanity Fair article he forwarded. The forwarded article, written by journalist Vicky Ward, details the relationship between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, referencing past allegations, Epstein's business history, and Ward's own bizarre interactions with the pair.
This document is an email chain from March 8, 2011, where Jeffrey Epstein forwards an email to Faith Kates. The original email, from an alias of Ghislaine Maxwell ('gmax') to an alias of Epstein ('J Jep'), contains a Vanity Fair article by Vicky Ward detailing the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell, her alleged role as a 'procurer,' and their financial mysteries. The article also references Epstein's past, including his associations with Prince Andrew, Les Wexner, and Steven Jude Hoffenberg, and announces Ward's intention to write more on the subject.
This document is an email sent by Jeffrey E. (from jeevacation@gmail.com) to Melanie Spinella on November 9, 2017. The email contains no text in the body, only a link to a Guardian article about the Paradise Papers, which mentions Donald Trump and Robert Kraft. The email includes a standard confidentiality notice and is marked with a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
This document, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030380, appears to be the footer of an email. It contains two distinct confidentiality notices: a standard one from Guardian News & Media Limited, and a second, more specific one stating the communication's contents are the property of "JEE" (Jeffrey Edward Epstein) and providing the contact email jeevacation@gmail.com. The top of the document is redacted.
This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030346', contains two separate email disclaimers. The first is a standard corporate and promotional footer from 'The Guardian' newspaper. The second is a legal and confidentiality notice stating the communication is the 'property of JEE' (likely Jeffrey E. Epstein) and provides the email 'jeevacation@gmail.com' for error reporting.
This document is a blog post from October 2010 reviewing an art exhibition in London called 'The House of the Nobleman,' curated by Wolfe von Lenkiewicz and Victoria Golembiovskaya. The author describes visiting the venue, a house on Regent's Park allegedly owned by a Russian billionaire, and comments on the interior design and the 'Who's Who' list of art on display. Although this document is from a collection related to the Epstein investigation (indicated by the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer), its content does not directly mention Jeffrey Epstein or his known associates.
This document is a list of detailed and probing questions, likely prepared for a deposition or interview with an individual implied to be Jeffrey Epstein. The questions, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026352', cover a vast range of his life, from his personal background and education to his high-profile meetings with political leaders, tech billionaires, and financiers. The inquiry touches on specific financial transactions, alleged advice given to powerful figures, and relationships with notable people from the 1970s through the early 2000s.
This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026349', is a comprehensive list of probing questions for an unnamed individual, likely Jeffrey Epstein. The questions cover a wide range of topics including his personal history, education, finances, and extensive relationships with powerful figures in politics, finance, and technology from the 1970s through the early 2000s.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity