| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Employee |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Prosecutor defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Co conspirators |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
location
Palm Beach residence
|
Ownership |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Inmate status check/report indicating Epstein is on Psych Observation. | Correctional Facility (like... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victim in New York filed a civil lawsuit against Epstein. | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Newspaper reports indicating Epstein planted false stories to discredit victims. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement (NPA) intended for broad, complete resolution of matters, including Eps... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein investigation in Florida | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about photographs depicting social settings involving Epstein and the President. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trip to the movies where Epstein touched Annie | New York (implied by later ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Execution of search warrant at Epstein's home; the house appeared 'scrubbed' of incriminating mat... | Epstein's Home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit filed by attorney against Epstein for malicious prosecution. | Palm Beach County Circuit C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trip to Marrakesh, Alhambra, and New Mexico, based on architectural pieces/paint, initiated by Al... | Marrakesh, Alhambra, New Me... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein introduced his assistant and another individual into a massage room, had them kiss and fo... | Massage room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein introduced and stroked a large white vibrator/massager on [Redacted]'s vagina during a ma... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Multiple instances of sexual misconduct by Epstein during massages, including masturbation, fondl... | Massage table | View |
| N/A | N/A | Clinton frequently flew with Epstein aboard his plane, then suddenly stopped. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | David Copperfield was a guest on several occasions at Epstein's house. | Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein allegedly had young girls at his New Mexico ranch and sexually abused girls in West Palm ... | Epstein's New Mexico Ranch,... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Time period relevant to a victim's diary entries and a meeting with Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plea agreement for Epstein to plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution (Fl. Stat. § 796.07) a... | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed sentencing: 30 months total, divided into 12 months and 6 months consecutive in county j... | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deferral of prosecution in Florida District for offenses, in favor of prosecution by the State of... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Drafting of a non-prosecution agreement term sheet by Villafaña, including provisions for victim ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Presentation of the document to defense counsel, with two terms dropped from Villafaña's draft: o... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visoski dropped off passenger manifests at Epstein's main office. | Epstein's main office in Ne... | View |
This legal document, filed on June 25, 2021, is part of a court case and argues that the discovery provided by the government fails to corroborate allegations of "grooming" or a conspiracy involving Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. It specifically challenges the government's claims about having incriminating "diary entries" and "flight records," suggesting the evidence produced is minimal and does not support the prosecution's narrative presented at a bail hearing.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she intentionally moved to New Hampshire to be within driving distance of New York prosecutors and that her defense counsel was in regular communication with the government for months. The filing aims to counter the government's portrayal of her as a fugitive who was hiding and changing locations.
This document, a page from a legal filing, analyzes the dramatic increase in negative media attention and public harassment directed at Ghislaine Maxwell following Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and death in mid-2019. It features a graph illustrating the spike in media mentions and describes how Maxwell was targeted with threats and derogatory language on social media, despite not being charged in the Epstein indictment at the time. The document also notes that the British tabloid The Sun offered a £10,000 bounty for information on her, contributing to the heightened scrutiny.
This legal document, filed on January 29, 2021, argues for Ms. Maxwell to be granted bail. It asserts that she has been financially transparent and was not hiding from the government prior to her arrest, but was instead seeking privacy to protect herself and her family from an intense media frenzy and physical threats that escalated dramatically after Epstein's arrest in July 2019. The filing uses data from LexisNexis to demonstrate the sharp increase in media articles about her following Epstein's arrest as evidence for her need to seek seclusion.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court is addressing defense arguments for release, comparing her situation to United States v. Friedman, but distinguishing it because Maxwell allegedly did not provide her whereabouts to the government despite staying in contact. The judge argues that Maxwell may not have realized the severity of the charges or the likelihood of prosecution until her actual indictment.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The questioning focuses on whether the witness can identify the true names of individuals referred to as 'Kate' (LV4) and 'Carolyn' (LV5) and if there are any records of them flying on 'Epstein's flights.' The witness states they do not recall seeing any records of Kate flying under her true name.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Visoski. Visoski confirms being introduced to an unnamed singer by Mr. Epstein on an airport ramp in West Palm Beach and provides a physical description of her. He also confirms that Epstein had a practice of inviting people onto his plane to show it off and meet the pilots, even if those individuals were not flying.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on the Interlochen Summer Arts Camp in Michigan, establishing it as a camp for young, talented artists. The questioner asks the witness if they were aware that Epstein had attended this camp as a young man, to which the witness replies they were not.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. Visoski testifies about the practice of keeping passenger manifests for flights on Epstein's planes, stating that records were kept for tax purposes and that when passenger names were unknown, their gender was noted instead.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The questioning focuses on Visoski's interactions with Sarah Kellen, establishing her role in scheduling flights in the 2000s and attempting to pinpoint the date of her first flight on one of Epstein's planes, suggested to be September 2001.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony describes the communication process for scheduling flights in the 1990s, which involved receiving a message on a beeper from Epstein's office and then calling back to speak with a secretary or assistant to make the arrangements. The witness confirms this procedure and also mentions occasionally speaking with someone named Ghislaine.
This document is a transcript of a legal cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, likely a pilot. The witness is questioned about their observations on flights and consistently denies ever seeing any evidence of sexual activity, such as strewn clothes, sex toys, or used condoms. Visoski affirms that based on their observations, they have no reason to believe Epstein or anyone else was engaging in such activities on the plane.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The questioning focuses on Visoski's time as a pilot for Epstein between approximately 1991 and 2005. Visoski testifies that in roughly a thousand flights, he never observed a female passenger who appeared to be under the age of 20 traveling without a parent or family member.
A court transcript excerpt from the cross-examination of a pilot named Visoski (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Visoski confirms he was hired in 1991 and flew approximately 1,000 flights for Epstein until 2005, utilizing both Gulfstream and Boeing aircraft. He acknowledges that Epstein frequently had other passengers, many of whom were female, and that he would often see or greet them at the plane's entrance.
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 387) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines arguments to exclude evidence related to 'Accuser-3,' asserting it is inadmissible under evidence rules like 404(b) and 403. In the alternative, it requests the court to prevent the government and Accuser-3 from describing her as a 'Minor' or as having been 'Sexually Abused' by Epstein.
This legal document is a filing by Ms. Maxwell's defense team arguing that the government has violated a court order regarding pre-trial disclosure. The defense claims that instead of identifying specific co-conspirator statements as ordered, the government has improperly directed them to sift through hundreds of thousands of statements from devices seized from Epstein. This tactic, they argue, makes it impossible to prepare for trial and subverts the Court's intention to have such issues litigated in advance.
This legal document discusses the government's alleged motives in a case, arguing that the defense's claims lack a legitimate theory. It references Epstein's death and the timing of charges, as well as the Second Circuit's explanation regarding government misconduct claims.
This legal document is a filing by the prosecution in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, arguing against the defense's attempts to introduce certain evidence. The prosecution contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein is irrelevant to the current case and that the fact the defendant was not charged by the USAO-SDFL after a Florida investigation is not admissible to challenge the credibility of Minor Victim-4. The document suggests that introducing these elements would mislead the jury and open the door to rebuttal from the government about the circumstances of the prior investigation.
This legal document is a filing by the prosecution arguing against the defense's motion to introduce evidence regarding the origins of the New York investigation. The prosecution contends that the defense's claims—that the investigation was improperly motivated by a prior non-prosecution agreement with Epstein, his death, and public pressure—are irrelevant to the defendant's guilt and would create a prejudicial 'circus' at trial.
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the Government's strategy for an upcoming trial. The prosecution anticipates defense attacks on the credibility of 'Minor Victims' and plans to introduce prior consistent statements to rebut these attacks and rehabilitate its witnesses. Additionally, the Government argues to preclude the defense from introducing what it deems irrelevant and prejudicial evidence, specifically concerning the history and outcomes of various 'Epstein investigations' in other jurisdictions.
This legal document summarizes the recollections of an individual identified as "AK" regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. AK recalls the topic resurfacing due to a Miami Herald article, her interactions with the Public Corruption unit around February 2016, and sharing case materials with individuals like Alison Moe. AK asserts she had no role in opening the subsequent SDNY investigation into Epstein and was disturbed by how the case was initially resolved in the SDFL.
This legal document outlines the recollections of an individual identified as 'AK' regarding discussions about the Epstein case. AK recalls a meeting with attorneys where she sought to clarify their proposal to have the SDNY re-investigate conduct previously handled in Florida, and she disputes an account of the meeting from Brad Edwards's book. The document also notes AK's vague memory of being told about depositions and the possibility of perjury charges against Maxwell, though no investigation was opened, and her decision to take no further action on the Epstein matter after calling Sean Watson.
This document summarizes the recollections of 'AK,' a Human Trafficking Coordinator, regarding potential investigations into Epstein at SDNY. AK denies that attorneys urged an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell as a 'duo,' stating the focus was on Epstein and Maxwell was only mentioned in passing. AK also denies ever meeting or speaking with attorney David Boies and has no memory of a second meeting on the subject in the summer of 2016.
This legal document details the recollections of an individual identified as "AK" regarding meetings about the Epstein case after February 29, 2016. AK describes meeting with attorneys who provided information on Epstein's conduct beyond Virginia Roberts, and a subsequent meeting with Dan Stein, Chief of the Criminal Division, where they decided on an action plan. This plan involved AK contacting Sean Watson of the FBI to have him inquire with Miami agents about their dissatisfaction with the resolution of the original Florida case.
This document is the signature page for an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It was signed on October 29, 2007, by Epstein's counsel, Gerald Lefcourt, and on October 30, 2007, by Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafana on behalf of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. The text confirms that Epstein has read, understood, and agrees to comply with the clarifications in the agreement.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid for a lot in Ghislaine Maxwell's l... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unspecified recip... | $0.00 | Mention of a 'donation' Epstein had made on a d... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $300.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Defense Attorneys | $0.00 | Cost of Epstein's defense | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victim | $300.00 | Payment for services (massage) | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Bill Richardson (... | $0.00 | Campaign donations from Epstein that Richardson... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Harvard | $30,000,000.00 | Donation for a theoretical physics research cen... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (first incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (second incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe #5 | $200.00 | Payment for giving a massage. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid Ghislaine Maxwell millions and mil... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Edwards' clients | $0.00 | Settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed t... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen Arts ... | $0.00 | Alleged payment for 'Jane'. The document text s... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Victims (implied) | $0.00 | Reference to 'Epstein's agreement... to provide... | View |
| N/A | Received | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown (Construc... | $0.00 | Purchase or construction of a cabin at Interloc... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen School | $0.00 | Possible donation of the cabin to the school (w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
If a girl had not been to his home before, Epstein asked for her phone number to contact her in the future.
Burt Fields or Eileen Guggenheim spoke to Epstein about Maria to help advance her artistic career.
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Epstein called Maria and offered her a job at his mansion in New York City.
Epstein told ML to leave her telephone number with his assistant so she could be contacted for work again.
United States will provide notice to Epstein before disclosing agreement under FOIA.
Discussion regarding Annie's trip to New Mexico
After the alleged assault, Epstein told Jane Doe to write down her name and phone number.
Epstein consistently notified Detective Deborah Anaya, a New Mexico official, whenever he spent time at his residence in New Mexico.
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
A photograph was sent to Epstein with a note saying 'Thanks for rocking my world'.
Email communication regarding Eva being in Paris and flying back, suggesting a close relationship with Epstein.
A message from 'Epstein' for Vanessa Grigoriadis of NY Magazine, to be delivered at 5:10 P.M. The message itself is simply 'Epstein'.
Copperfield called Epstein frequently and left messages indicating they socialized together.
Epstein called Carter to say he was having second thoughts about being a public figure.
The witness, Kate, describes her communications with Epstein during her twenties and early thirties as having a 'friendly' tone. She continued communicating because she did not want to admit what had happened to her and was fearful of disengaging.
During the second massage, JS told Epstein she didn't want to be touched after he attempted to touch her breasts.
Update on rapid Bitcoin price swings
Narrator told Epstein she wasn't coming back because she had fallen in love.
Epstein was on the phone at the beginning of the massage session with ML.
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Epstein told Dobbs 'You can bring girls.'
Allegations that Edwards 'should have known' about the Ponzi scheme.
Epstein encouraged girls to find other girls interested in performing massages for him.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity