| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
49
Very Strong
|
99 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Lilly Sanchez
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Kirsty Mackenzie
|
Correspondents |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jennifer Martinez
|
Interviewer witness |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Correspondent |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Krischer
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jose Lambiet
|
Source journalist |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ASA Weiss
|
Conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant State Attorney
|
Professional conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Herman
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Belohlavek
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Belohlavek
|
Indirect professional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Daliah Weiss
|
Conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Co counsel |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Legal representative |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
My K
|
Communicated with caller recipient |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña and her supervisor engaged in phone and email exchanges with Krischer and Epstein's cou... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Krischer informed USAO's West Palm Beach manager that a resolution for Epstein's c... | West Palm Beach (USAO) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's lawyers sign a letter disputing a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Letter signed by Epstein's legal team responding to a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein passed a polygraph test regarding knowledge of victims' ages. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Legal investigation | A state investigation into allegations that Epstein coerced girls into sexual activity, leading h... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of a letter by Epstein's legal team refuting sex trafficking offenses | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein entered a plea deal, pleading guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring... | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Taking of a voluntary, sworn statement from a witness named Jennifer. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Taking of a sworn statement from a witness named Jennifer regarding an investigation into Jeffrey... | Palm Beach County, Florida ... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing | Unknown | View |
| 2021-08-26 | N/A | Telephone Conference | Remote/Telephone | View |
| 2020-10-11 | N/A | Privilege review of Epstein search warrant database identified emails from attorney Jack Goldberger. | N/A | View |
| 2019-03-14 | N/A | Circulation of negative press regarding Epstein's prosecution team among his legal defense team. | View | |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Article published in print | New York Times | View |
| 2016-11-02 | N/A | Jeffrey E. sent an email to Jack Goldberger and Darren Indyke containing a link to a Guardian new... | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-28 | N/A | Reuters inquiry regarding a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein initiates an email chain among his le... | N/A | View |
| 2012-06-14 | N/A | Deposition of Scott Rothstein | Ft. Lauderdale, Florida (Vi... | View |
| 2011-03-07 | N/A | The BBC's Today programme, via Kirsty Mackenzie, requested an interview with Jeffrey Epstein to a... | N/A | View |
| 2011-03-07 | N/A | The BBC's Today programme, via Kirsty Mackenzie, formally requested an interview with Jeffrey Eps... | UK | View |
| 2011-03-07 | N/A | The BBC's Today Programme, via Interviews Editor Kirsty Mackenzie, requested an interview with Je... | UK | View |
| 2011-03-07 | N/A | Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC's Today Programme sent an email requesting an interview with Jeffrey ... | N/A | View |
| 2010-01-05 | N/A | Proposed golf outing at Trump course. | Palm Beach (Trump Course) | View |
| 2010-01-01 | N/A | Golf at Trump course | Palm Beach | View |
| 2009-10-16 | N/A | Agreed Order signed by Judge Jeffrey Colbath deleting the 'mandatory public service' condition du... | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
This document contains FBI administrative records and a significant collection of newspaper clippings regarding the 2005-2006 Palm Beach Police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It includes an FBI request to open a child prostitution case in July 2006, a redacted probable cause affidavit mentioning a houseman's testimony, and subpoenas for a Grand Jury. The bulk of the content comes from Palm Beach Post articles detailing the friction between the police and the State Attorney's office, the recruitment of underage girls by Haley Robson, and Epstein's high-profile connections.
This document contains scanned telephone message books from the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office (likely Barry Krischer's office) spanning from 2005 to 2009. The messages document high-frequency communication between the State Attorney ('BK' or 'Mr. K') and Epstein's defense team (Alan Dershowitz, Jack Goldberger, Bruce Lyons), as well as significant media inquiries regarding Epstein's indictment, prison sentence, and potential charges in the Virgin Islands. A critical handwritten note advises 'No don't give to Feds our case unless they take all,' highlighting the jurisdictional tension between state and federal prosecutors.
This document contains several newspaper clippings from The Palm Beach Post in late July and early August 2006, detailing Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and indictment for soliciting prostitution. The articles cover his booking, release on bond, his attorney Jack Goldberger's claims of a 'distorted view' from police, and background information on Epstein's properties, social connections, and past legal troubles. The clippings also mention the involvement of State Attorney Barry Krischer and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter in the case.
A Palm Beach Police Department incident report detailing allegations of aggressive stalking by private investigators hired by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team in May 2006. The report also analyzes phone records from March 2006, linking a specific individual who intimidated a victim directly to phone numbers registered to Epstein's corporations at 457 Madison Ave, including Ghislaine Corporation and El Zorro Ranch Corporation. The investigator notes a pattern where the intimidator would call the victim and immediately communicate with Epstein's office.
Court minutes from a June 25, 2009 hearing presided over by Judge Jeffrey Colbath regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case (Nos. 2006CF009454AXX / 2008CF009381AXX). The proceedings involved motions to unseal records and intervene, argued by attorneys for the Palm Beach Post and unidentified parties (likely victims), with the Judge granting the motions to unseal and intervene. Defense counsel Jack Goldberger moved to stay disclosure.
This document is an 'Agreed Order' from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated October 16, 2009, in the case of State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2008CF009381A). The order, signed by Judge Jeffrey Colbath, states that the 'mandatory public service' requirement previously marked on Epstein's community control order was a clerical error and is thereby deleted. The decision was based on an agreement between Epstein's attorney Jack Goldberger and ASA Barbara Burns after reviewing the plea agreement and transcript.
An exhibit list from the 15th Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated June 25, 2009, for the case State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2008CF4351). The document lists three exhibits submitted by the defense: two orders involving attorney Jack Goldberger and a copy of a 'Victims Petition for enforcement of Crime Victims Rights Act' associated with attorney Brad Edwards. The hearing type is noted as a 'Motion to Unseal records'.
This document is a transcript of court proceedings from June 26, 2009, regarding State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein. The hearing concerns a 'Motion to Stay' filed by Epstein's defense to prevent the immediate release of sealed documents, specifically a Non-Prosecution Agreement (MPA) and grand jury materials, pending an appeal. The Judge denies the indefinite stay and the request for a bond but grants a short delay until the following Thursday to allow the defense time to file with the appellate court. The document also touches on potential redactions of children's names, which the Judge notes were not actually found in the documents in question.
This document is a 'Motion to Intervene' filed on June 15, 2009, in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2008CF009381AXX). An unnamed (redacted) applicant, represented by Spencer T. Kuvin, seeks to intervene to join the Palm Beach Post in arguing for access to the sealed Federal non-prosecution agreement. The applicant argues they have a pending civil complaint against Epstein with similar allegations and require the sealed document for discovery and impeachment purposes.
This document is a motion filed on June 3, 2009, by a redacted nonparty (a victim of Jeffrey Epstein) seeking to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its addendum in the Florida state criminal case. The motion argues the sealing violated Florida judicial rules and public policy, and that the documents are material to the victim's pending civil suit. Exhibits include judgments of conviction against Epstein for solicitation and procuring a minor, sealing orders from 2008, and transcripts from the June 30, 2008 plea conference where the existence of the federal NPA was discussed in open court.
A Notice of Hearing filed in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County regarding the case State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2008-CF9381 AXX). The hearing, scheduled for May 29, 2009, before Judge Jeffrey J. Colbath, concerns a motion by a redacted non-party (represented by Bradley J. Edwards for client 'E.W.') to vacate an order sealing records and to unseal said records. The file path in the footer references 'Wild v. Epstein', suggesting the redacted party may be named Wild.
A court order from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, setting a hearing for May 29, 2009. The hearing concerns a motion by a redacted nonparty to vacate an order sealing records and to unseal records in the case of State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein. Copies were sent to the Assistant State Attorney, Epstein's lawyer Jack Goldberger, and William J. Berger, attorney for an individual identified as E.W.
A 'Plea in the Circuit Court' document from the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated June 30, 2008. In this document, Jeffrey Epstein (represented by attorney Jack Goldberger) waives various legal rights, including the right to a jury trial and the right to remain silent, in relation to case numbers 06-CF 009454 AMB and 08-CF 009381 AMB. Notably, in section 11, Epstein specifically selects a program that is 'NOT spiritually based' regarding his sentence/probation.
This document is an appeal by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein against a Magistrate's Order compelling him to produce discovery materials, including correspondence with prosecutors, tax returns, and passport/travel records. Epstein argues that producing these documents violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination because he still faces a real threat of federal prosecution outside the Southern District of Florida, despite his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filing also details privacy concerns for third parties (alleged victims), claims attorney work-product privilege over files selected by his defense counsel, and argues that his offer to stipulate to a high net worth renders the production of his tax returns unnecessary.
This document is a Motion for No-Contact Order filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida on May 22, 2009. The plaintiffs argue that despite a state plea agreement prohibiting contact, Epstein's counsel refused to confirm he would not contact federal victims. The filing includes exhibits of correspondence between attorneys and a transcript of the 2008 plea conference where Judge Pucillo explicitly defined 'indirect contact' to include Facebook and MySpace.
This document is a transcript of a plea conference for Jeffrey Epstein held in June 2008 in Palm Beach County Court. Epstein pleads guilty to state charges involving solicitation of prostitution and procuring a minor, agreeing to an 18-month jail sentence followed by community control (probation). The transcript details the specific conditions of his release, including residency at his Palm Beach home, work release at his own 'Florida Science Foundation' (located in the same building as his attorney), and strict prohibitions on contacting victims or minors.
This is a legal motion filed on December 14, 2015, in the Supreme Court of Florida (Case No. SC15-2286) by Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris. Epstein requests an extension of time until January 19, 2016, to file his initial brief on jurisdiction. The document notes that the Respondent's counsel, Philip M. Burlington, has no objection to the request, and includes a service list of attorneys involved in the related proceedings.
This document is a legal filing dated December 10, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris, files a 'Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction' with the Supreme Court of Florida. Epstein is appealing a decision made on November 12, 2015, by the District Court of Appeal (Fourth District) in the case of 'Bradley J. Edwards v. Jeffrey Epstein'. The attached opinion reveals that the lower court reversed a summary judgment that had favored Epstein, ruling that 'litigation privilege' does not bar Edwards' claim of malicious prosecution against Epstein.
This document is a legal reply filed on June 4, 2009, by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs are requesting a court order prohibiting Jeffrey Epstein and his agents from contacting them directly or indirectly, citing his status as a convicted sex offender and their fear of intimidation. The document also includes a service list detailing the legal representation for various parties, including Bruce E. Reinhart representing co-defendant Sarah Kellen.
This document is a Motion for Leave to File Under Seal submitted on May 29, 2009, by attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs request permission to file their response to Epstein's Motion to Stay under seal, or alternatively, request the court to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) so they can adequately respond. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing attorneys representing Epstein, co-defendant Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and various other Jane Doe plaintiffs.
This document is a legal reply filed on May 29, 2009, by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida, arguing for the right to proceed anonymously in their lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs contend that Epstein aims to reveal their identities to harass and intimidate them, and they cite various legal precedents and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to support their request for privacy due to the sexual nature of the crimes committed against them as minors. The document also includes a service list detailing the attorneys representing various parties in related cases against Epstein.
This document is a Clerk's Notice of Reassignment from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated April 10, 2009. It notifies parties in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case ID: 502008CA020614XXXXMB) that the case has been reassigned from Judge Diana Lewis to Judge Donald W. Hafele. The document lists attorneys Robert Critton Jr, Michael Pike, Isidro Garcia, and Jack Goldberger on the distribution list.
A court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe #1 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants the Defendant's Motion to Align Response Date. Copies were furnished to several attorneys including Bruce Reinhart and Jack Goldberger.
This document is an agreed motion filed on May 13, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 103 against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff requests a one-week extension to file a response to Epstein's motion to dismiss because the parties are in the process of resolving the matter via settlement, which would render the motion moot. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing legal counsel for Epstein, Co-Defendant Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and plaintiffs in several related cases.
This document is an agreed motion for an extension of time filed on April 22, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-80309-WJZ). Plaintiff's counsel, Katherine W. Ezell, requests an extension until May 13, 2010, to file a response to Epstein's motion to dismiss because she is leaving for a vacation in Italy the following day. The motion notes that Epstein's counsel, Robert Critton, agrees to the extension, and the document includes a service list of attorneys involved in this and related cases.
Stated that Epstein had fully complied with his non-prosecution agreement and there should be no pending investigations.
Stated Epstein fully complied with requirements and there are no pending investigations.
Stated that Epstein had fully complied with his non-prosecution agreement and there should be no pending investigations.
Statement regarding allegations made many years ago and agreement to remain confidential to protect collateral third parties.
He's never denied girls came to the house.
Stated that Epstein had fully complied with his non-prosecution agreement and there should be no pending investigations.
Defended fighting the release to protect third parties; stated Epstein abided by terms.
Statement that 'This case is absolutely going to end without a trial within the next two months.'
Goldberger predicted the case would end without a trial within two months.
j
Privileged - Redacted
donald attnny?
Looking for his name. haven't located yet
Looking for his name. haven't located yet
donald attnny?
Kirsty Mackenzie from the BBC's Today programme wrote to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request an interview with Epstein. The purpose was to discuss stories circulating about Epstein and Prince Andrew, allowing Epstein to provide his side and better scrutinize what she calls 'speculative reporting'.
Kirsty Mackenzie from the BBC's Today programme wrote to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request an interview with Epstein. The purpose was to discuss stories circulating about Epstein and Prince Andrew, allowing Epstein to provide his side and better scrutinize what she calls 'speculative reporting'.
Kirsty Mackenzie from the BBC's Today programme writes to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request he forward a message to Epstein. The message is a pitch for an interview with Epstein regarding circulating stories about him and Prince Andrew.
Kirsty Mackenzie from the BBC's Today programme writes to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request he forward a message to Epstein. The message is a pitch for an interview with Epstein regarding circulating stories about him and Prince Andrew.
This email forwards a message from Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC to Jeffrey Epstein.
An interview request for Jeffrey Epstein from the BBC's Today Programme. The request is regarding circulating stories about Epstein and Prince Andrew, and the BBC wants to give Epstein a chance to respond firsthand to the 'speculative reporting' in the UK press. Mackenzie pitches the prominence and global reach of the Today programme.
Jack Goldberger forwards an email from Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC to Jeffrey Epstein. The original email contains an interview request.
Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC's Today Programme writes to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request an interview with Epstein regarding circulating stories about him and Prince Andrew.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity