| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Proposed NSPCC Internal Review | UK | View |
This document is an email chain from August 2019 detailing the FBI's attempt, via UK Metropolitan Police, to interview a female witness (DOB May 1973) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. While initially willing to cooperate on August 16th, the witness retracted her offer on August 19th following Epstein's death, citing fears for her safety and concerns that her name would appear on Twitter. The document includes a background check on the witness revealing no criminal trace, though a 2013 report of 'suspicious circumstances' exists in police databases.
This document is a formal notification from the UK National Crime Agency (NCA) to the FBI, dated June 30, 2020. It discusses allegations against Clare Guinness (Lady Clare Iveagh), specifically her alleged close contact with Jeffrey Epstein and an allegation of sexual abuse against a redacted individual. The NCA requests the FBI's view on whether an internal review by the NSPCC charity, where Iveagh holds a presidency, would interfere with the US investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a speech or essay discussing environmental ethics, biodiversity loss, and climate change. It references the Fifth IPCC report and contrasts the economic philosophies of Bjorn Lomborg (who downplays long-term climate priority) against economists Stern and Weizman (who advocate for protecting future generations). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it is part of a government release, likely related to the Epstein investigation given the context of the request, though the text itself is purely scientific/academic.
This document is an email chain from March 2011 involving Ghislaine Maxwell ('Gmax'), her brothers Ian and Kevin Maxwell, and associates like Ross Gow. The content focuses on media handling strategies, specifically analyzing the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) code regarding payments to witnesses in criminal trials. Ross Gow advises the group on how editors can justify payments in the 'public interest' while calling a figure named 'Maz' (likely a journalist) 'devious and cunning'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity