Ms. Farmer
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
7
|
2 | |
|
organization
Boies Schiller
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Victim perpetrator |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Juror witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Witness comparison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Farmer's sister
|
Siblings co victims |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Older Sister
|
Sibling |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mulligan
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mike Baker
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim abuser |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
OTS
|
Ownership symbolic |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Interview | Ms. Farmer gave an interview to Mr. Baker about her experiences. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Farmer reclaimed boots by wearing them. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | Hiring | Ms. Farmer hired the Boies Schiller firm. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Seizure of property | Boots belonging to Ms. Farmer were seized. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A recent trial prep session where the discussion about Ms. Farmer wearing the seized boots occurred. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentencing Hearing (likely for Ghislaine Maxwell) | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| N/A | Evidence collection | Boots were obtained from Ms. Farmer. The exact date is the subject of the questioning. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | A trip taken by Ms. Farmer to New Mexico. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Interview | An interview between Ms. Farmer and journalist Mike Baker regarding her experiences. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | Ms. Farmer took a trip to New Mexico. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Ms. Farmer first met with the Boies Schiller firm when they were representing Virginia Roberts. | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-16 | N/A | Ms. Farmer traveled to New York as a high school junior. | New York | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Filing date of Document 78 in Case 22-1426 (likely an appeal case given the date). | Court | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where victim impact statements are being read. Ms. Moe argues for an above-gui... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where victim impact statements are being delivered. The court confirms an anon... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Direct examination of a witness (identified as Young and Ms. Farmer) by counsel (Ms. Menninger) i... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings: Cross-examination of Ms. Farmer in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | Court hearing | A witness identified as 'Kate' begins to deliver her victim impact statement. The court first con... | Courtroom | View |
| 2020-12-10 | N/A | Court Hearing regarding pretrial detention of Ghislaine Maxwell | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing where Ms. Farmer testifies and Brad Edwards introduces Courtney Wild | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00015107.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 6, 2025, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Epstein and Maxwell's criminal scheme, advocating for the redaction of victims' names while opposing similar protection for third-party enablers. It references a July 6, 2025 Memorandum and several civil cases, asserting that transparency and accountability necessitate the release of information concerning individuals involved in sex trafficking.
DOJ-OGR-00015106.jpg
This document is a legal filing (page 4 of an internal document, page 11 of the court filing) arguing for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts with specific conditions. The filing argues that while victim identities (such as Ms. Farmer) must be redacted to protect their privacy and psychological wellbeing, the Court should not 'rubber stamp' redactions for third-party affiliates of Epstein and Maxwell who have not been charged, suggesting such broad redactions would resemble a cover-up. It cites multiple legal precedents regarding privacy interests in sexual abuse cases, including *Giuffre v. Maxwell* and *Doe 1 v. JP Morgan Chase Bank*.
DOJ-OGR-00014811.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 22, 2022, detailing a portion of a legal proceeding. The court confirms a previously established anonymity order for a witness using the pseudonym "Kate," specifically instructing sketch artists not to draw an exact likeness. Kate then begins her victim impact statement, expressing fear for her daughter's safety in the context of eroding women's rights and referencing a collective effort to bring a "common enemy" to justice.
DOJ-OGR-00014807.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on August 22, 2022, likely related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. A speaker, Ms. Moe, argues for a harsh sentence, after which a victim, Ms. Farmer, delivers a powerful statement detailing the long-term psychological trauma, including a profound loss of self-trust, resulting from the abuse she suffered from both Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001045.jpg
This page of a court transcript records the conclusion of a victim impact statement by Ms. Farmer urging the detention of Ghislaine Maxwell due to flight risk and the severity of her alleged crimes. Following this, the Court confirms with the government representative, Ms. Moe, that there are no other victims wishing to speak and clarifies that the government is not seeking specific findings regarding danger to the community for pretrial detention purposes.
DOJ-OGR-00000770.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of victim Annie Farmer by her counsel Sigrid S. McCawley, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing supports redacting victims' personal information for privacy but strongly opposes redacting the names of co-conspirators and enablers, asserting that their identities should be public to ensure accountability and justice. It references other civil lawsuits against entities like JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank as part of a broader effort to hold third parties involved in the sex-trafficking scheme accountable.
DOJ-OGR-00000769.jpg
This legal document argues for the release of grand jury transcripts with narrowly tailored redactions to protect the identities of victims like Ms. Farmer, citing their strong privacy interests as established in previous cases. However, it argues against redacting the names of third parties who have not been charged or alleged to be involved in the crimes of Epstein and Maxwell, suggesting such an effort "smacks of a cover up" and requires independent court scrutiny.
DOJ-OGR-00000767.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 5, 2025, is a motion arguing for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to the sex-trafficking crimes of Epstein and Maxwell. The filing, made on behalf of victims, asserts that transparency is crucial for justice, public understanding, and holding all responsible parties accountable, citing legal precedent from the Second Circuit. It emphasizes the victims' desire for full disclosure to illuminate the scope of the abuse and identify those who enabled the criminal enterprise.
DOJ-OGR-00000583.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing filed on July 24, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). It features testimony from Ms. Farmer confirming Jeffrey Epstein's inappropriate conduct toward her. Subsequently, attorney Brad Edwards introduces his client, Courtney Wild, identifying her as the 'Jane Doe' in a 2008 civil lawsuit against the U.S. Attorney's Office regarding violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act connected to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00016246.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, where a witness, A. Farmer, testifies about meeting Epstein at his home. She describes his residence as "very grand" and "fancy," contrasting it with the small apartment where she was staying with her sister. The witness recounts that after talking and having champagne, Epstein's driver took them to the theater, and that Epstein had asked about her future plans.
DOJ-OGR-00001918.jpg
This document is page 41 of a court transcript from December 10, 2020, concerning the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It captures the conclusion of a statement by Ms. Farmer (a victim), who argues Maxwell is a flight risk due to global associates and wealth, and urges her continued detention. Following this, the Judge questions prosecutor Ms. Moe to confirm there are no other victims wishing to speak and clarifies that the government is not relying on 'danger to the community' arguments for pretrial detention.
DOJ-OGR-00021606.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) featuring testimony from Ms. Farmer (likely Annie or Maria Farmer). She describes the psychological impact of the abuse, including the grooming process that led to self-doubt, survivor guilt, and the realization that her sister and many other women were also exploited by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The court briefly interrupts to ask her to slow down her speech.
DOJ-OGR-00021605.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Page 60) of a sentencing hearing, likely for Ghislaine Maxwell. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues for a harsh sentence to demonstrate that wealth does not place one above the law. Subsequently, a victim named Ms. Farmer begins her impact statement, describing the psychological trauma and loss of self-trust resulting from abuse committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00016962.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It captures a legal debate where Mr. Everdell requests an addition to the jury instructions concerning the testimony of witnesses Kate and Ms. Farmer. Mr. Rohrbach argues against this addition, claiming the existing instructions are sufficient and that adding more would confuse the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00016806.jpg
This is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Young. The attorneys, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Comey, agree to stipulate the date on which boots were seized to save court time. Ms. Menninger proceeds to question the witness about a discussion concerning Ms. Farmer wearing these boots, which the witness confirms took place during a recent trial preparation session after the seizure.
DOJ-OGR-00016797.jpg
This page contains court testimony from a witness named Young (likely law enforcement) during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The questioning focuses on previous testimony by Ms. Farmer regarding 'reclaiming' a pair of boots in 2006, and whether Young documented this specific detail in a report during trial prep interviews. The dialogue also establishes that Young conducted multiple interviews with a victim referred to as 'Jane' alongside a partner, Detective Byrnes, and prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00016796.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding the date some boots were obtained. The witness is unable to recall the specific date but confirms it happened sometime during that year, before the fall.
DOJ-OGR-00016795.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Young, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning establishes that interview records (302s) are summaries, not verbatim transcripts, and were not audio or video recorded. The focus then shifts to interviews the witness conducted with another witness, Annie Farmer, concerning her testimony about a pair of boots, and confirms that the defense had subpoenaed these boots earlier in the year.
DOJ-OGR-00009024.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing dated February 24, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It shows screenshots of tweets from Lucia Osborne-Crowley, who announced an exclusive interview with a juror ('Scotty') from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, and a responsive tweet from Annie Farmer expressing gratitude. The document states that Juror No. 50 subsequently 'liked' Farmer's tweet and then tweeted directly at her, indicating a direct social media interaction between a juror and a witness/survivor.
DOJ-OGR-00013805.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Mulligan, by an attorney, Ms. Sternheim. The questioning probes the reliability of Mr. Mulligan's memory of events from over 25 years prior and his awareness of media coverage and documentaries involving his 'close friend,' Ms. Farmer.
DOJ-OGR-00013665.jpg
This document is page 74 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records the beginning of the cross-examination of Ms. Farmer (Annie Farmer) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The testimony establishes that Ms. Farmer traveled to New York to visit her older sister when she was a 16-year-old high school junior.
DOJ-OGR-00013596.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The proceedings involve discussions between the Judge and attorneys (Ms. Moe, Ms. Menninger, Mr. Pagliuca) regarding limiting instructions for a witness named Ms. Farmer, modeled after a previous witness named Kate. Additionally, attorney Mr. Pagliuca discloses a new witness, William Brown, a DMV record custodian relevant to identity verification.
DOJ-OGR-00009718.jpg
This legal document presents evidence of potential juror misconduct in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It includes a screenshot of a deleted tweet, allegedly from Juror No. 50, to a witness/victim (@anniefarmer), stating her story was critical to the jury's verdict. The document further alleges that this juror posted about his jury service on Instagram in early January 2022, despite having told the Court during voir dire that he had deleted his account.
DOJ-OGR-00011583.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a portion of a court proceeding where a witness, identified only as 'Kate' due to an anonymity order, begins to deliver her victim impact statement. Before she speaks, Ms. Moe confirms the protective order with the court, which is affirmed, and Kate then starts her emotional testimony about fearing for her child's safety and fighting for justice against a 'common enemy'.
DOJ-OGR-00011579.jpg
This page contains a transcript from the sentencing hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell on July 22, 2022. A speaker named Ms. Moe concludes her argument for a harsh, above-guideline sentence, emphasizing accountability for the wealthy and powerful. Following this, Judge Nathan calls Ms. Farmer to the podium, who begins her victim impact statement describing the long-term psychological damage caused by the abuse she suffered at the hands of Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
Victim Impact Statement
Describing the long-lasting effects of abuse by Maxwell and Epstein, specifically the loss of trust in herself.
Confirming dates and trip to New Mexico
Ms. Farmer confirms having email communications with journalist Mike Baker, where he confirmed certain dates and asked about the timing of her trip to New Mexico.
Ms. Farmer's experiences
Ms. Farmer confirms she gave an interview to Mr. Baker regarding her experiences.
Ms. Farmer's experiences
Ms. Farmer confirms she gave an interview to Mr. Baker regarding her experiences.
Trip to New Mexico
One of the communications from Mr. Baker to Ms. Farmer was an inquiry about the timing of her trip to New Mexico.
Victim Impact Statement
Description of psychological trauma, survivor guilt, and the grooming tactics used by Epstein and Maxwell.
Confirming certain dates
Ms. Farmer confirms having email communications with journalist Mike Baker, where he was confirming certain dates with her prior to an interview.
Timing of when boots were obtained
Ms. Menninger questions witness Ms. Farmer about the date some boots were obtained. Ms. Farmer states she does not recall the specific date or month but confirms it was sometime in the current year and earlier than the fall.
Victim Impact Statement
Describing the psychological impact of abuse by Maxwell and Epstein.
Victim Statement
Statement arguing Maxwell is a flight risk and should be detained until trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity