| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unidentified Respondent
|
Intellectual debate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
unidentified speaker
|
Intellectual academic correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown (All Caps Writer)
|
Correspondent |
5
|
1 |
This document appears to be a printout of an email correspondence or draft response between scientists, likely involving Peter Richerson ('pjr') and an unnamed evolutionary biologist (the author writing in caps). The text contains a heated academic debate regarding the validity of 'cultural argumentation' versus 'genetic' or evolutionary biology explanations for human behavior, specifically citing kinship, grandmother investment, and honour killings. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was obtained during a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community.
This document is a transcript of an intellectual debate (likely via email) regarding evolutionary biology, specifically focusing on natural selection vs. creationism and the validity of 'cultural group selection.' The primary contributors are 'pjr' (likely Peter J. Richerson), who defends cultural group selection and critiques the concept of an Omniscient Designer, and an unidentified respondent who expresses skepticism toward cultural selection while discussing economic analogies involving Adam Smith and Brian Mannix. The document includes references to prominent evolutionary anthropologists and biologists such as Richard Wrangham, Sarah Hrdy, and David Haig.
This document appears to be a page from an email thread between 'pjr' (likely evolutionary biologist Peter J. Richerson) and an unidentified respondent (likely Jeffrey Epstein, given the document source). They discuss the evolutionary basis of psychopathy in dominance hierarchies, citing a 2016 BBS paper. The conversation shifts to a geopolitical analysis of Middle Eastern dictators (Saddam Hussein, Assad) and a critique of US foreign interventionism in the region.
A document showing a debate, likely via email, between two individuals regarding evolutionary genetics and psychopathy. One participant ('pjr', highlighted text) cites academic research on antisocial traits and argues that psychopaths make poor parents. The respondent (writing in all caps) dismisses the research as irrelevant and defends Donald Trump's parenting skills as a counter-argument to the claim that psychopaths are 'lousy fathers,' while also discussing cancer evolution and honor killings.
Discussion on evolutionary psychology, psychopathy in leadership, and US foreign policy failures.
Discussion regarding evolutionary biology, cancer, psychopathy, and Donald Trump's parenting.
Discussion on maladaptations, creationism vs evolution, and cultural group selection.
Discussion on maladaptations, creationism vs evolution, and cultural group selection.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity