This document is a transcript of an interview or deposition where Todd Blanche questions Ghislaine Maxwell about Jeffrey Epstein's connections. Maxwell confirms that Epstein met members of the Royal Family and, prior to her meeting him, lived in London where he knew high society individuals, specifically naming Princess Diana's best friend, Rosa Monckton, and her husband, Dominic Lawson.
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Kate. She testifies about giving massages to Epstein, stating that none of them were non-sexual, and that Maxwell would debrief her afterwards. Kate also recounts receiving a Prada handbag as a birthday gift in London from "Ghislaine and Jeffrey."
This document is a transcript of court testimony from a witness named Kate. She describes Maxwell's role as managing properties for Jeffrey and ensuring they met his standards. Kate testifies that Maxwell claimed to own houses in London and New York City, with the latter being a gift from Jeffrey, and also claimed to be friends with prominent figures like Prince Andrew and Donald Trump.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on the frequency of her encounters with Epstein and Maxwell at Maxwell's house in London over several years, beginning when she was 17. This followed an incident where Epstein allegedly engaged in sex acts with her during massages at the same location.
This document is a page from a court transcript of a witness named Kate under direct examination, filed on August 10, 2022. Kate testifies about seeing a seventeen-year-old girl having tea with Ghislaine Maxwell at her London townhouse. The questioning also establishes that Kate saw Epstein at the same location on three separate occasions and probes what Maxwell may have said regarding Epstein's potential opinion of the girl.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Kate. Kate testifies that Epstein engaged in a sex act with her during a massage, and that immediately afterward, Ghislaine Maxwell questioned her about the experience in an 'excited and happy' manner. Kate also states she saw Epstein again a few days later at Ghislaine Maxwell's house in London.
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi recounts a brief, five-minute visit to Ms. Maxwell's small townhome in London, which occurred while Alessi was employed by Mr. Epstein. The witness also states that Ms. Maxwell imposed numerous rules on Mr. Epstein's staff regarding presentation, dress, and forms of address.
This document is a page from jury instructions (Instruction No. 36) in a federal criminal case, filed on December 18, 2021. It details the 'overt act' element required to prove a conspiracy charge, listing specific allegations from the indictment against conspirators Maxwell and Epstein. The alleged overt acts, occurring between 1994 and 2002, involve the sexual abuse and exploitation of underage victims identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, and Carolyn across multiple locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London.
This document is a legal letter filed on December 18, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests permission for a witness, Mr. Hamilton, to testify remotely from London via WebEx because he has tested positive for COVID-19 and cannot travel. The defense argues that precluding his testimony would violate Maxwell's constitutional rights to present a defense and confront accusers, specifically mentioning the need to expose the bias of an accuser named Kate.
This document is page 5 of a legal motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense on March 23, 2021, arguing for bail. It proposes retired Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. as an independent monitor for Maxwell's and her spouse's assets, specifically including proceeds from the sale of her London home, to address the Court's flight risk concerns. The defense argues against the government's claims of 'lack of candor,' citing the harsh conditions (solitary confinement, suicide watch) Maxwell was under when questioned by Pretrial Services.
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing that the Court should reject the defendant's proposed monitorship condition for her release from detention. The Government contends the proposal is insufficient because the defendant has a history of lacking candor about her finances, possesses significant international ties, and would retain control over substantial unrestrained assets, such as a $2 million townhouse in London. The filing emphasizes that the defendant remains a flight risk, a concern heightened by the previously established difficulty and length of any potential extradition process.
This is page 6 of a legal defense filing (Reply Memorandum) dated December 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against the government's claim that Maxwell is hiding assets to prepare for flight, stating that her transfers to her spouse were disclosed on tax returns and that her asset estimates from jail were accurate given the circumstances. The document details financial specifics, including a London property used for loans and $4 million controlled by her spouse, with specific details regarding the spouse's assets redacted.
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against a defendant's proposed bail package. The prosecution contends that the defendant is a significant flight risk because a new financial report reveals she has approximately $22 million in assets, far more than previously disclosed, including a $2 million London townhouse and over $4 million in unrestrained funds. The Government further argues that the bond is effectively worthless because two proposed co-signers are UK residents, against whom the bond could not be realistically recovered if the defendant were to flee.
This court filing details Ghislaine Maxwell's financial history from 2015 to 2020, citing a 'Macalvins report.' It documents her 2015 net worth ($20.2M), the sale of an NYC apartment for $15M, her 2016 marriage, and the subsequent transfer of assets into a trust controlled by her spouse. Footnotes clarify discrepancies between her self-reported assets during a Pretrial Services interview ($3.8M) and her actual financial standing, attributing the difference to lack of access to records while detained.
This legal document details how the Defendant and Epstein used financial gifts and payments as a grooming tactic to gain victims' trust and facilitate sexual abuse. It cites testimony from a victim named 'Jane' about receiving money and payments for lessons, and mentions promises made to another victim, 'Annie'. The document also discusses the geographic scope of the conspiracy, noting that sexual conduct occurred not only in New York and Florida but also in New Mexico and London, involving other victims like Carolyn and Virginia Roberts.
This document is a news article from DailyMail.Online detailing an interview with 'Scotty,' a juror from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Scotty discusses the jury's deliberations, their negative reaction to the defense's aggressive tactics towards victims, and the overwhelming complexity of the 80-page jury instructions. A sidebar article reports on a separate legal issue, describing a 'brutal' court hearing for Prince Andrew in New York for a sexual abuse lawsuit, where a judge appeared unreceptive to his lawyers' arguments to dismiss the case.
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a cross-examination of a person named Kate. The questioning covers a $1,200 payment for therapy and Kate's familiarity with a man named Ray Hamilton, whom she describes as an acquaintance and a friend of a friend, known both in 'the states' and London.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on an incident where Kate missed a flight from the US to London, met a man named Kevin, and went to his home. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) objects to this line of questioning on grounds of relevance, leading the judge to call for a sidebar.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Kate, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on Kate's relationship with Ghislaine and Epstein, confirming she spent time with them in London and the United States. The questioner also probes inconsistencies in Kate's testimony regarding her age at marriage and references an incident where she failed to return to London from the U.S. while her husband was waiting for her.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on her past modeling work in Europe (Milan, Paris, London) and her subsequent move to the United States on an 'extraordinary ability' visa.
This document is page 74 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The testimony establishes that Kate grew up in the wealthy Belgravia section of London, very close to 44 Kinnerton Street, where Ghislaine Maxwell lived. The questioning also touches on Kate's mother's beauty and the attention she received.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named 'Kate'. She testifies that she worked as a musician and model, and that Epstein initiated sexual activity with her starting at age 17 and continuing into her early thirties. She states this occurred 'every time' they were together, including sexualized massages in London, Palm Beach, and on his island.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Kate. Kate describes Ghislaine Maxwell's demeanor when discussing sexual topics as oddly youthful and "like a schoolgirl." She also testifies that Maxwell asked about her sex life and that she confided in Maxwell about her family difficulties, and states that her initial understanding was that Jeffrey Epstein was Maxwell's boyfriend.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a dialogue between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Everdell. Mr. Everdell argues against admitting evidence provided by the government, stating it is new information that his client, Ms. Maxwell, was not shown during her deposition. He suggests that any confusion in her testimony about her past addresses in London could be due to the vagueness of questioning and her having lived in many different places.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell is addressing the Court regarding the timeline of the defendant's residence at a property on Kinnerton Street in London. Everdell argues that despite a deposition statement where the defendant claimed to be there in 1992 or 1993, she did not own or reside at the property at that time, noting that another couple lived there prior to her purchase.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity