Everdell
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SDNY Prosecutors
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Parkinson
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of Mr. Parkinson regarding a search of a house. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court break | The court calls for a mid-afternoon break of about 15 minutes. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Recess | A recess is taken during the court proceedings. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Filing date of Document 751 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Meeting at SDNY offices | SDNY offices | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Court Cross-Examination in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018340.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and two lawyers, Mr. Rohrbach and Mr. Everdell. The conversation focuses on refining the language of a limiting instruction for a jury. The instruction pertains to testimony from a witness named Kate about alleged sexual conduct with someone named Epstein, with the judge clarifying that the government is specifically directed not to inquire about details unless the defense opens the door to such questions.
DOJ-OGR-00018332.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022. In it, the judge dismisses a witness, Mr. Dawson, for the weekend, stipulating that he may only have logistical contact with the government as he is still under cross-examination. The judge and counsel then discuss and set a filing schedule for briefs related to the next witness, Maguire, who is scheduled to testify the following Monday.
DOJ-OGR-00018302.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Parkinson. The questioning confirms that a house Parkinson had previously searched was undergoing renovations at the time, evidenced by carpet samples, floor plans, and architectural drawings. The proceedings also involve referencing 'Government Exhibit 298' for the witness and jury to view.
DOJ-OGR-00018238.jpg
This document is a page from the trial transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson (likely law enforcement), by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. They are reviewing a video (Government Exhibit 296) showing the initial police search of a residence (likely Epstein's Palm Beach home), describing the layout, and identifying the property manager, Janusz Banasiak, as he is being read a search warrant.
DOJ-OGR-00017615.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, is arguing a procedural point to the judge about the defense's ability to introduce its own evidence through a witness called by the government. He provides two examples: a real one involving FedEx records and a hypothetical one involving a witness named Larry Visoski who recently testified about pictures of Little St. James Island.
DOJ-OGR-00014882.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated January 15, 2025. Counsel discusses logistical matters, including receiving permission for Mr. Pagliuca to miss a final pretrial conference due to a hearing in Colorado. The court then moves to a Daubert hearing concerning the government's proposed expert, Dr. Lisa Rocchio, whose name pronunciation is clarified for the record.
DOJ-OGR-00019060.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a moment during a trial where the judge calls for a mid-afternoon break. The cross-examination of witness Rodgers by defense attorney Everdell is paused, and the jury and witness are dismissed. The attorneys for the government (Ms. Comey, Ms. Moe) and defense (Mr. Everdell) confirm they have no immediate matters to discuss, with Mr. Everdell noting he is less than halfway through his questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00002082.jpg
This document is a timeline infographic filed as a legal exhibit (Document 97-18) in December 2020, illustrating the frequency of contact between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (attorneys Pagliuca, Everdell, and Cohen) and SDNY prosecutors. The timeline covers the period from July 2019 through March 2020, detailing specific phone calls, email exchanges, and in-person meetings at SDNY offices. The graphic aims to demonstrate that the defense was in regular communication with the prosecution leading up to the 2020 dates.
DOJ-OGR-00019147.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Chapell, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. During the testimony, Government Exhibits are discussed and admitted into evidence, with Ms. Chapell identifying Exhibit 802 as an "Invoice on Jeffrey E. Epstein's account." The government then offers this exhibit under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00017019.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between a judge and several attorneys regarding the logistics for closing arguments. The conversation focuses on procedures for handling redacted exhibits and presenting sealed video evidence exclusively to the jury, not on public screens. The judge also issues a directive that counsel must not orally refer to the real names of witnesses who testified under pseudonyms.
DOJ-OGR-00016580.jpg
This document is a page of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Sud. He is being questioned about a report, Defense Exhibit RS-1, which he confirms he ran in 2016 for a customer with the file name "Epstein". The report contains invoice details and covers the years 1999, 2005, and 2006.
DOJ-OGR-00016569.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding on August 10, 2022. It captures the moment the court calls for a recess, dismissing the witness, Ms. Espinosa, and the jury. After a brief exchange with the government counsel (Ms. Pomerantz) and defense counsel (Mr. Everdell), the court resumes the session, instructing Mr. Everdell to continue his direct examination of Ms. Espinosa.
DOJ-OGR-00016470.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and several attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Ms. Moe, Ms. Menninger). The discussion centers on procedural issues concerning witnesses, including the legal authority for witness anonymity and the application of Rule 615, which governs the presence of witnesses in the courtroom. The attorneys agree to research and brief the court on the legal basis for their positions.
DOJ-OGR-00013506.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Rodgers, by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. Mr. Everdell presents a photograph (referenced as exhibits GX250 and C10) to the witness. After initially stating he had not seen the picture before, Mr. Rodgers tentatively identifies the person in the photograph as Eva Dubin.
DOJ-OGR-00013476.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. The judge calls for a mid-afternoon break during the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. After a recess, Mr. Everdell informs the court that he is not yet halfway through his questioning, indicating the examination will continue for some time.
DOJ-OGR-00011752.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Visoski, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Mr. Visoski identifies a photograph, marked as Government Exhibit 202, as the garage of Jeffrey Epstein's house in Palm Beach. Following his testimony and no objection from opposing counsel Mr. Everdell, the court admits the exhibit into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00017519.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the end of a witness's, Mr. Visoski's, testimony, where he is excused by the judge. Following his departure, the counsel for the defense (Mr. Everdell) and the government (Ms. Comey) have a brief procedural exchange with the judge before the government is invited to call its next witness.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitted to the Court to draw attention to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's decision in the William Henry Cosby Jr. case, arguing it provides support for Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motion to dismiss charges based on a non-prosecution agreement.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitted to the Court to draw attention to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's decision in the William Henry Cosby Jr. case, arguing it provides support for Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motion to dismiss charges based on a non-prosecution agreement.
No Subject
No preview available
No Subject
No preview available
No Subject
No preview available
No Subject
No preview available
No Subject
No preview available
No Subject
No preview available
No Subject
No preview available
No Subject
No preview available
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity