DOJ-OGR-00017615.jpg
620 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
620 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, is arguing a procedural point to the judge about the defense's ability to introduce its own evidence through a witness called by the government. He provides two examples: a real one involving FedEx records and a hypothetical one involving a witness named Larry Visoski who recently testified about pictures of Little St. James Island.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Everdell | Mr. |
Speaking to the judge ('your Honor') during a court proceeding, likely as an attorney.
|
| your Honor | Judge |
Being addressed by Mr. Everdell in a court proceeding.
|
| Larry Visoski | Witness |
Mentioned as someone who recently testified about pictures of Little St. James Island.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FedEx | company |
Mentioned in an example regarding the introduction of FedEx records through a document custodian in court.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, indicating they are the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
| government | government agency |
Referred to as a party in the legal case, likely the prosecution, that wants to introduce evidence and has called a w...
|
| defense | legal entity |
Referred to as a party in the legal case that wants to introduce its own evidence through a witness called by the gov...
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
Mr. Everdell is making a legal argument to a judge about the procedure for introducing evidence.
Courtroom
Mr. Everdell
your Honor
Larry Visoski testified about pictures of structures and houses on Little St. James Island.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the subject of pictures shown to a witness, Larry Visoski, who testified about structures and houses on ...
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Everdell, likely an attorney, is addressing the judge ('your Honor') in a formal court setting.
The document describes the two parties in a legal case, discussing how the defense might introduce evidence through a witness called by the government.
Key Quotes (2)
"I think that's right, your Honor."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Agreeing with the judge's framing of the legal question.)
DOJ-OGR-00017615.jpg
Quote #1
"Larry Visoski just testified. He was shown a number of pictures of Little St. James Island where there were structures, houses on the island. And he testified to those,"Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Providing a hypothetical example to the court based on a recent witness's testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00017615.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,580 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 264 412
LC1VMAX1
LC1VMAX1
1 temporal time split, that is to say, you don't have to put on
2 your first witness, is not the question; it's a functional
3 question, are you putting on evidence in your case-in-chief as
4 opposed to impeachment testimony.
5 MR. EVERDELL: I think that's right, your Honor.
6 Let's give an example, because I think it's helpful to
7 use examples. I'll use one from this very case.
8 It's my understanding that the government wants to
9 introduce certain FedEx records through a FedEx document
10 custodian. The defense also would like to introduce other
11 FedEx records, coincidentally, through the same document
12 custodian. So if that happens, you'd have a witness called by
13 the government, the defense would want to introduce affirmative
14 proof in its case through that same witness. That would be
15 defense case-in-chief material which, by the way, we disclosed
16 in our Rule 16 letter to the government. That's an example, I
17 think, where the courts are talking about where you disclose
18 things -- where you have a witness where you are trying to put
19 on affirmative proof in the defense case through the
20 government's witness. That is an example where we don't
21 dispute.
22 I'll give another example. This is a hypothetical
23 one. Larry Visoski just testified. He was shown a number of
24 pictures of Little St. James Island where there were
25 structures, houses on the island. And he testified to those,
2 your first witness, is not the question; it's a functional
3 question, are you putting on evidence in your case-in-chief as
4 opposed to impeachment testimony.
5 MR. EVERDELL: I think that's right, your Honor.
6 Let's give an example, because I think it's helpful to
7 use examples. I'll use one from this very case.
8 It's my understanding that the government wants to
9 introduce certain FedEx records through a FedEx document
10 custodian. The defense also would like to introduce other
11 FedEx records, coincidentally, through the same document
12 custodian. So if that happens, you'd have a witness called by
13 the government, the defense would want to introduce affirmative
14 proof in its case through that same witness. That would be
15 defense case-in-chief material which, by the way, we disclosed
16 in our Rule 16 letter to the government. That's an example, I
17 think, where the courts are talking about where you disclose
18 things -- where you have a witness where you are trying to put
19 on affirmative proof in the defense case through the
20 government's witness. That is an example where we don't
21 dispute.
22 I'll give another example. This is a hypothetical
23 one. Larry Visoski just testified. He was shown a number of
24 pictures of Little St. James Island where there were
25 structures, houses on the island. And he testified to those,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017615
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document