SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00020785.pdf
An email dated April 27, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The sender is inquiring about the metadata of an attached document (USGME01088996.doc), specifically asking to identify the device the document originated from.
EFTA00020781.pdf
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from March 2019 regarding the technical processing of evidence for the case 'US v. Epstein' (Case #2018R01618). An Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) requests the uploading of subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF) into the Relativity review platform. The technical staff discusses issues with DVD-formatted video files (VIDEO_TS folders) and specific interviews/walkthrough videos that require conversion or exclusion from the database.
EFTA00020780.pdf
An email dated March 25, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York requesting the upload of subpoena response documents from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF) into the Relativity database for the case US v. Epstein (2018R01618). The email specifies a network file path on the DOJ cloud server containing the documents and outlines the desired folder structure for the upload relative to the 'FBI Case File'.
EFTA00020773.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) to Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback regarding the investigation into the Epstein estate. The email outlines protocols for producing evidence found at the New York residence, specifically photographs and discs, and raises the issue of whether the estate will waive attorney-client privilege for the purpose of the United States v. Maxwell case.
EFTA00020769.pdf
This document is an email chain from March and April 2019 between the Southern District of New York (SDNY) Assistant U.S. Attorney's office and technical support staff regarding the 'US v. Epstein' case (USAO # 2018R01618). The correspondence details the process of loading subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (referred to as BSF) into the Relativity e-discovery database. The emails specifically reference file paths containing video interviews with individuals identified only by initials (H.R., J.H., S.V., A.D., A.T.) and discuss the technical handling of DVD file structures.
EFTA00020766.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 12-13, 2019, between defense attorneys Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) regarding the U.S. v. Epstein case. The correspondence concerns discovery requests, specifically regarding financial records from 'Institution 1' and details about 'two wires' that the defense wished to review prior to a hearing scheduled for the following Monday. The chain also includes a submission from the Government to Judge Berman's chambers attaching a reply in support of the detention memo and opposition to bail.
EFTA00020699.pdf
This document is an email thread from April 2019 involving Boies Schiller Flexner LLP regarding a Grand Jury Subpoena. The correspondence discusses a sealed order from the Southern District of New York granting BSF permission to produce confidential discovery materials from the case '[Redacted] v. Maxwell' (likely Giuffre v. Maxwell) in response to the subpoena. It explicitly notes that the order does not apply to other litigation such as 'In re Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein'.
EFTA00020697.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 15, 2019, between Peter Skinner (likely representing Boies Schiller Flexner) and a redacted sender (likely a federal prosecutor). The correspondence concerns a Grand Jury subpoena served on BSF regarding the 'Guiffre v. Maxwell' civil case. The redacted sender provides a sealed order granting BSF permission to turn over 'CONFIDENTIAL' discovery materials to the Grand Jury, while explicitly noting this order does not apply to the 'Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein' litigation.
EFTA00020692.pdf
This document is an email chain from March and April 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and IT/litigation support staff regarding the 'US v. Epstein' case (2018R01618). The correspondence details the technical process of uploading subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (referred to as BSF) into the Relativity review platform. The text reveals specific file paths indicating the government was in possession of video interviews with individuals identified by initials (H.R., J.H., S.V., A.D., A.T.).
EFTA00020674.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Miami defense attorney Joe Nascimento and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence begins on July 6, 2019, immediately after a client (previously represented by Nascimento's deceased partner Alan Ross) was served with a grand jury subpoena. The emails discuss scheduling meetings in West Palm Beach, including a meeting on July 12 and a proposed 'proffer' session for the client on September 4, 2019, showing active investigation and cooperation negotiations continuing after Epstein's death.
EFTA00020672.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2019 between Anjan Sahni (likely representing subpoenaed entities) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are scheduling a conference call to discuss subpoenas issued to redacted entities 'in connection with the Epstein investigation.' The AUSA references previous contact with Steve D'Allessandro regarding the matter.
EFTA00020670.pdf
This document contains an email chain from July 27, 2020, between the prosecution (Southern District of New York) and the defense team in the case United States v. Maxwell. The correspondence concerns scheduling a 'meet and confer' regarding a protective order, specifically addressing the Government's concerns about the defendant potentially naming victims of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell in public filings. The Government also requests a 1 terabyte hard drive from the defense to facilitate the production of discovery materials.
EFTA00020662.pdf
This document is an email chain from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the SDNY. The primary email, dated August 10, 2019 (the day of Epstein's death), reports that Epstein made a phone call the previous night (August 9) around 7:00 PM to his girlfriend, Kristina Schuliak. The email notes that Schuliak's lawyer indicated she is willing to disclose the content of the call in exchange for certain protections.
EFTA00020570.pdf
An internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Public Affairs) dated February 7, 2020. The email conveys an attachment titled 'Larry_Ray_Q_&_A_2.7.2020.docx', likely related to press inquiries or preparation regarding the Larry Ray case.
EFTA00020526.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and MDC staff regarding the delivery of legal discovery materials (hard drives) to Ghislaine Maxwell. The FBI assisted in transporting the drives. The delivery was delayed because the paralegal responsible for logging the drives was absent, and when delivery was attempted, Maxwell was occupied with a Video Teleconference (VTC).
EFTA00020450.pdf
This document is an email chain from August and September 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY), the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), and the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The primary official subject is an inquiry into the status of Jeffrey Epstein's 'finalized suicide reconstruction report,' which the USANYS had not yet received. The correspondence also touches on a prisoner transfer to Englewood, a 'QPDF case,' and personal health issues affecting an OIG employee.
EFTA00020439.pdf
This document contains an email chain from March 2021 between defense attorney David Oscar Markus and a redacted Assistant United States Attorney regarding U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Markus introduces himself as appellate counsel for Maxwell's bail appeal and requests access to specific unredacted docket entries. The government confirms its opposition to the bail motion and notes that a protective order (ECF No. 36) is already in place.
EFTA00020430.pdf
This document contains an email chain from March 29, 2021, between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence details technical disputes regarding discovery materials, specifically the defense's inability to provide a hard drive to Maxwell in prison (MDC), issues with unreadable disks, missing email attachments, and discrepancies in metadata for over 110,000 files seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The prosecution explains that some metadata is missing because files were 'carved or deleted' and offers solutions for transferring missing files.
EFTA00020426.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven specific issues, including the inability of Maxwell to view files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), metadata discrepancies suggesting files were created/modified after seizure, and gaps in Bates numbering. The prosecution responds by explaining technical limitations with the MDC (prison), asserting that metadata reflects the state of files upon FBI seizure or carving, and clarifying that certain images came from physical CDs seized from Epstein's residences in 2019 rather than electronic extractions.
EFTA00020372.pdf
This document is an Amended Application, Affidavit, and Warrant from the SDNY dated June 30, 2020, authorizing the FBI to obtain prospective location and pen register information for a cellphone subscribed to 'G Max' (Ghislaine Maxwell) to effect her arrest on sex trafficking charges. The amendment was filed to correct inadvertent errors in a previous affidavit regarding the dates of Maxwell's most recent phone contacts with her sister, Isabel Maxwell, and associate Scott Borgerson. The document establishes probable cause by linking the phone to Maxwell through contacts with her civil attorneys, sister, and financial partner.
EFTA00020367.pdf
An email dated July 9, 2020, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to recipients addressed as 'Chris' and 'Mark' (likely defense counsel). The email regards the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell' and includes a proposed protective order as an attachment to facilitate the start of discovery productions.
EFTA00020358.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorneys Chris, Mark, and Jeff, dated July 2, 2020. It serves as formal notification that their client (identified via attachments as Ghislaine Maxwell) was arrested by the FBI that morning in Bradford, New Hampshire. The email attaches the indictment and arrest warrant and outlines the immediate legal steps, including her transport for processing and an expected remote court presentation in the District of New Hampshire later that afternoon.
EFTA00020345.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 23, 2019, between an Associate U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and likely a former prosecutor or official involved with the Southern District of Florida (S.D.Fla.) cases. The SDNY team requests a call to gather information pertinent to an anticipated motion by Jeffrey Epstein to dismiss the 2019 charges based on his 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement in Florida. The recipient agrees to assist the trial team. The communication was cleared by an Associate Deputy Attorney General (ADAG).
EFTA00020342.pdf
An email from the Public Affairs office of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 17, 2019. The sender discusses conferring with two redacted individuals regarding the 'Epstein Bail Statement' and agrees with their misgivings about making any public statements regarding detention at that time.
EFTA00020341.pdf
This document is an internal email thread from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated July 17, 2019. It discusses the strategy for a public statement regarding Jeffrey Epstein's bail and detention. A Public Affairs officer notes that after conferring with redacted individuals who had 'misgivings,' the office agreed not to make a statement at that time.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity