EFTA00020439.pdf

102 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email correspondence / legal correspondence
File Size: 102 KB
Summary

This document contains an email chain from March 2021 between defense attorney David Oscar Markus and a redacted Assistant United States Attorney regarding U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Markus introduces himself as appellate counsel for Maxwell's bail appeal and requests access to specific unredacted docket entries. The government confirms its opposition to the bail motion and notes that a protective order (ECF No. 36) is already in place.

People (6)

Name Role Context
David Oscar Markus Defense Attorney
Appellate counsel engaged to represent Ghislaine Maxwell in her appeal for bail.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell; appealing denial of bail.
[Redacted Name] Assistant United States Attorney
Prosecution representing the Southern District of New York; opposing bail motion.
Christian Everdell Defense Counsel
CC'd on the email chain.
Bobbi Sternheim Defense Counsel
CC'd on the email chain.
Mark S. Cohen Defense Counsel
CC'd on the email chain.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Email domain @usa.doj.gov
US Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York
Office of the prosecution
Second Circuit
Court of Appeals where the bail motion is being filed
markuslaw.com
Law firm of David Oscar Markus

Timeline (1 events)

2021-03-31
Preparation of motion for bail in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
Second Circuit

Locations (2)

Location Context
Jurisdiction
Address of the Assistant United States Attorney

Relationships (2)

David Oscar Markus Attorney-Client Ghislaine Maxwell
Markus states: 'I have been engaged to represent Ghislaine Maxwell in her appeal'
David Oscar Markus Co-Counsel/Defense Team Christian Everdell
AUSA suggests Markus obtain materials from defense counsel and copies Everdell.

Key Quotes (4)

"Confirmed, the Government opposes the motion for bail and intends to file a response."
Source
EFTA00020439.pdf
Quote #1
"I have been engaged to represent Ghislaine Maxwell in her appeal from the denial of her third application for bail."
Source
EFTA00020439.pdf
Quote #2
"This case is already governed by a protective order (ECF No. 36), which is binding on all counsel."
Source
EFTA00020439.pdf
Quote #3
"I will need access to certain unredacted documents, including docket entries 4, 18, 22, 97, 100, 103, 106, 159, 160, 165, 171, 169."
Source
EFTA00020439.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,717 characters)

From: [Redacted]@usa.doj.gov>
To: David Oscar Markus , [Redacted](USANYS)"
[Redacted]@usa.doj.gov>
Cc: "[Redacted]@usa.doj.gov>
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:15:15 +0000
David,
Confirmed, the Government opposes the motion for bail and intends to file a response.
Best,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
1 St. Andrew's Plaza
New York, NY 10007
212-637-[Redacted]
From: David Oscar Markus
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 11:02 AM
To: [Redacted]
Subject: Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
[Redacted],
We are preparing our motion for bail in the Second Circuit and need to inform the Court of the government's position. We intend to let the Court know that the Government's opposes Ms. Maxwell's motion and intends to file a response. Please confirm.
Thanks,
David
--David Oscar Markus
EFTA00020439
markuslaw.com
305-379-[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]@usdoj.gov>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 7:10 PM
To: David Oscar Markus
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS); [Redacted] (USANYS); Christian Everdell; Bobbi Sternheim (bcsternheim@mac.com);
Mark S. Cohen
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
David,
Thanks for letting us know that you’ll be counsel on this appeal. As an initial matter, the majority of the docket entries you’ve referenced do not appear to be redacted. In any event, you may obtain these materials from defense counsel -- I’ve copied them here. This case is already governed by a protective order (ECF No. 36), which is binding on all counsel.
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, NY 10007
(212) 637-[Redacted]
From: David Oscar Markus
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 5:33 PM
To: [Redacted] >;
EFTA00020440
[Redacted]@usa.doj.gov>
Subject: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Good afternoon counsel:
I have been engaged to represent Ghislaine Maxwell in her appeal from the denial of her third application for bail. In preparing this appeal, I will need access to certain unredacted documents, including docket entries 4, 18, 22, 97, 100, 103, 106, 159, 160, 165, 171, 169. Do you have any objection to me having access to these unredacted documents? (There may be additional documents that I need, but I have not identified them as of yet.) I’m happy to enter into a protective order with the government if you believe that is necessary. I plan on filing the appeal next week, so I would appreciate it if you could get back to me as soon as possible.
Thank you,
David
--David Oscar Markus
markuslaw.com
305-379-[Redacted]
EFTA00020441

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document