This document contains an email chain from March 2021 between defense attorney David Oscar Markus and a redacted Assistant United States Attorney regarding U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Markus introduces himself as appellate counsel for Maxwell's bail appeal and requests access to specific unredacted docket entries. The government confirms its opposition to the bail motion and notes that a protective order (ECF No. 36) is already in place.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Oscar Markus | Defense Attorney |
Appellate counsel engaged to represent Ghislaine Maxwell in her appeal for bail.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell; appealing denial of bail.
|
| [Redacted Name] | Assistant United States Attorney |
Prosecution representing the Southern District of New York; opposing bail motion.
|
| Christian Everdell | Defense Counsel |
CC'd on the email chain.
|
| Bobbi Sternheim | Defense Counsel |
CC'd on the email chain.
|
| Mark S. Cohen | Defense Counsel |
CC'd on the email chain.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Email domain @usa.doj.gov
|
|
| US Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York |
Office of the prosecution
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Court of Appeals where the bail motion is being filed
|
|
| markuslaw.com |
Law firm of David Oscar Markus
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction
|
|
|
Address of the Assistant United States Attorney
|
"Confirmed, the Government opposes the motion for bail and intends to file a response."Source
"I have been engaged to represent Ghislaine Maxwell in her appeal from the denial of her third application for bail."Source
"This case is already governed by a protective order (ECF No. 36), which is binding on all counsel."Source
"I will need access to certain unredacted documents, including docket entries 4, 18, 22, 97, 100, 103, 106, 159, 160, 165, 171, 169."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,717 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document