SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00015083.jpg
This is a court order filed on August 5, 2025, by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order provides logistical instructions for victims wishing to submit letters regarding the Government's motion to unseal grand jury materials, setting a deadline for submission to the US Attorney's Office by August 5, 2025. It further instructs the Government to hand-deliver these submissions to the Court by August 6, 2025, in both unredacted (sealed) and redacted (public) formats.
DOJ-OGR-00015082.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 4, 2025, is a submission from the U.S. Government to judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The government discusses legal precedents for grand jury secrecy, notes that Epstein's death is a relevant factor, and details its ongoing efforts to notify all victims before the information is released. The filing is submitted by U.S. Attorney General Pamela J. Bondi, Deputy AG Todd Blanche, and U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton.
DOJ-OGR-00015079.jpg
This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer, dated August 4, 2025. The Government is responding to a court order to provide more information about grand jury materials it has moved to unseal in the criminal cases against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter outlines the specific information requested by the court, which includes dates of grand jury presentations, exhibits shown, and the government's position on unsealing these materials.
DOJ-OGR-00015078.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated August 4, 2025, and signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. The order officially grants the request of attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of the firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to withdraw from representing Ghislaine Maxwell as her co-counsel in case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
DOJ-OGR-00015077.jpg
This is a proposed court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 1, 2025, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, to be signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, grants the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to withdraw as co-counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00015072.jpg
This is a court order filed on July 31, 2025, by District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge is directing the Government to submit a letter by August 4, 2025, clarifying whether their motion to unseal includes grand jury exhibits in addition to transcripts, and to identify specific non-public exhibits proposed for release. The text notes that proposed releases would be redacted to protect victim identities.
DOJ-OGR-00015062.jpg
This is the cover page of a Government Memorandum filed on July 29, 2025, in the Southern District of New York. It addresses two cases: USA v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490) and USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The document lists Pamela J. Bondi as Attorney General, Todd Blanche as Deputy AG, and Jay Clayton as US Attorney for SDNY.
DOJ-OGR-00015058.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer denies a motion to intervene filed by MSW Media, Inc., which sought to address the redaction of grand jury transcripts. While the motion is denied, the judge states the court will consider the views expressed in MSW Media's letter.
DOJ-OGR-00015055.jpg
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 23, 2025 (likely a filing system date or typo, as the case number is 20 Cr. 330). Judge Paul A. Engelmayer denies Maxwell's motion (Dkt. 793) to access grand jury transcripts, which she requested in order to comment on the Government's pending motion to unseal said transcripts. The Judge cites legal precedent establishing the secrecy of grand jury proceedings and rules that Maxwell failed to demonstrate the 'compelling necessity' required to break that secrecy.
DOJ-OGR-00015053.jpg
This legal document is a "Notice of Appearance" filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Melissa Madrigal, from the law firm MARKUS/MOSS PLLC, is formally notifying the court of her role as co-counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is dated July 22, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00015052.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for case 1:20-CR-00330-PAE (USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC is formally entering his appearance as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, certifying that he is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice. The document is dated July 22, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00015051.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 22, 2025, in the case of United States vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, grants the motion for attorney David Oscar Markus of Florida to be admitted Pro Hac Vice. This allows Markus to officially act as legal counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in this specific case.
DOJ-OGR-00015047.jpg
This document is a Court Order filed on July 22, 2025, by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge acknowledges the Government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts but states the Court cannot rule without a Memorandum of Law addressing the specific exceptions to Grand Jury secrecy (Rule 6(e)). A footnote notes a parallel motion was filed in the case against Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00015046.jpg
This document is a formal "Notice of Appearance" filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated July 21, 2025, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Oestericher officially notifies the court that he is representing the United States in this case. The notice requests the Clerk of Court to record his appearance and add him to the electronic notification system for all case filings.
DOJ-OGR-00015045.jpg
This is a proposed court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of U.S. vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, grants the motion for attorney David Oscar Markus of Florida to be admitted 'pro hac vice', allowing him to serve as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in this specific case.
DOJ-OGR-00015043.jpg
This document is a sworn affidavit from attorney David Oscar Markus, dated July 21, 2025, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Markus attests under penalty of perjury that he is an attorney in good standing with the Florida bar, has no felony convictions, and has no history of professional disciplinary action. The affidavit supports his motion to appear 'pro hac vice' (for this particular case) as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00015040.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed by the U.S. Attorney General's office, arguing that the Court should release grand jury transcripts from the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The motion contends that public interest, coupled with the diminished privacy interests following Epstein's death, justifies this release, despite Maxwell's case being pending before the Supreme Court.
DOJ-OGR-00015037.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed by the U.S. Department of Justice on July 18, 2025, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The motion requests the court to unseal grand jury transcripts associated with the indictment, citing public interest and the importance of transparency. This action follows a July 6, 2025, memorandum from the DOJ and FBI which concluded their review of investigative holdings related to Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence to investigate uncharged third parties.
DOJ-OGR-00015036.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on July 18, 2025, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, concerning the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Todd Blanche, a Deputy Attorney General, formally requests to appear in the case and be added as a Filing User, with electronic filings to be sent to Jordan.Fox@usdoj.gov.
DOJ-OGR-00015035.jpg
This document is a 'Notice of Filing of Official Transcript' filed on January 15, 2025, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-cr-330). It notifies parties that a transcript for a hearing held on November 10, 2021, has been filed and outlines the deadlines and procedures for requesting redactions of personal data identifiers before the transcript becomes public.
DOJ-OGR-00015034.jpg
This document is an 'Index of Examination' page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines the testimony of witness Lisa Rocchio, detailing page numbers for direct examination by Ms. Pomerantz and cross-examination by Mr. Pagliuca. It also lists Government Exhibits 1-5 and Defendant Exhibits A and B introduced during this testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00015030.jpg
This document is page 154 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, who is testifying about the scientific validity of reasons for false allegations, such as lying, intoxication, and psychiatric disorders. Rocchio states that while false allegations occur, they represent a very small minority of cases and notes a lack of specific scientific research linking the suggested factors as predictors.
DOJ-OGR-00015020.jpg
This is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca is cross-examining a witness named Rocchio regarding 'Government Exhibit 6,' a study analyzing delayed reporting of psychological issues. Pagliuca attempts to establish that the current case does not involve allegations of delayed reporting by males, leading to an objection by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz on the grounds that the witness does not know the specific details of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00015019.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on January 15, 2025. It documents the cross-examination of an expert witness named Rocchio by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding 'Exhibit 6,' a study on barriers to and facilitators of delayed disclosure in abuse cases. The witness defends their opinion as being based on the totality of their professional experience rather than a single article.
DOJ-OGR-00015012.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on January 15, 2025. It features an exchange between the Court and a witness named Rocchio regarding the scientific consensus on 'grooming strategies' and 'trauma bonding' in the context of sex work. The witness asserts that the concept of offenders using tactics to develop relationships with victims is well-established in peer-reviewed literature.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity