SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00001634.jpg
This is a court order issued on July 21, 2020, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order states that the court has received numerous letters and messages from non-parties but will not consider or docket them as they are procedurally improper or irrelevant. The court will apply this same treatment to any future correspondence of this nature.
DOJ-OGR-00001633.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 15, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, establishes a schedule for legal proceedings, including deadlines for discovery and motions, and sets the trial date for July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00001632.jpg
This is a legal waiver filed on July 14, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Maxwell, through her attorney Christian R. Everdell, waives her right to be physically present at an upcoming conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic, provided she can communicate privately with her counsel. The document is signed by Everdell on behalf of Maxwell and accepted by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00001631.jpg
This document is a 'Waiver of Right to be Present at Criminal Proceeding' filed in the Southern District of New York on July 14, 2020, for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. In the document, signed on July 10, 2020, by her attorney Christian R. Everdell, Maxwell waives her right to appear in person for her arraignment, bail hearing, and conference, citing the COVID-19 pandemic as a reason for the bail hearing waiver.
DOJ-OGR-00001627.jpg
This document is page 17 of a court filing (Document 22) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 13, 2020. The text argues against granting bail, citing an 'extraordinary risk of flight' and rejecting the defendant's claim that detention at the MDC prevents adequate preparation for defense. The filing cites numerous precedents (Tolentino, Adamu, Brito, etc.) where bail was denied despite access-to-counsel restrictions, distinguishing the current case from *United States v. Stephens*.
DOJ-OGR-00001617.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against the defendant's motion to dismiss charges. The Government asserts that the charges are timely under the law, independent of a prior investigation, and that the defendant's claims are baseless. Furthermore, the document argues that the defendant poses an extreme flight risk due to her international ties, financial resources, and French citizenship, noting that France does not extradite its citizens to the U.S.
DOJ-OGR-00001616.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 13, 2020, is a portion of the prosecution's argument against a defendant's motion. The prosecution contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida does not protect the defendant from prosecution in the Southern District of New York, as she was not a party to the agreement and it does not bind other districts. A footnote reveals that since the charges were made public, the FBI has been contacted by new individuals willing to provide more evidence against the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00001613.jpg
This document is a legal filing from the government arguing against a defendant's proposed bail package. The government asserts the defendant is a significant flight risk due to her opaque finances, access to extraordinary resources abroad, and demonstrated skill at hiding. The proposed $5 million bond is deemed insufficient because it relies on an overseas property as collateral and six unidentified co-signers whose ability or incentive to pay is unknown.
DOJ-OGR-00001611.jpg
This document is the cover page for the Government's Reply Memorandum in Support of Detention regarding the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It was filed on July 13, 2020, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The filing lists Audrey Strauss as the Acting U.S. Attorney, along with Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00001610.jpg
This document is a legal waiver filed on July 10, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In the document, Maxwell waives her right to be physically present at an upcoming court conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic, authorizing her attorney, Christian R. Everdell, to participate on her behalf. Everdell signs the document on Maxwell's behalf and affirms that he has discussed the waiver and her rights with her.
DOJ-OGR-00001609.jpg
A court document filed on July 10, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, wherein Ghislaine Maxwell waives her right to be physically present at her arraignment, bail hearing, and conference. The document is signed on her behalf by her attorney, Christian R. Everdell, and specifically cites the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason for waiving physical presence at the bail hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00001608.jpg
This document is a legal filing titled "Notice of Appearance" from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 10, 2020. Attorney Christian R. Everdell of the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP formally notifies the court that he is representing the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the criminal case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00001604.jpg
This document is page 24 of a legal filing (Document 18) from July 10, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail due to COVID-19 risks and the adequacy of the proposed bail package. The defense proposes a $5 million bond co-signed by six individuals (siblings, relatives, friends) and secured by $3.75 million in UK property, along with home detention, GPS monitoring, and travel restrictions to NY districts. A footnote cites *United States v. Boustani* to argue that private security guards are appropriate given Maxwell's circumstances.
DOJ-OGR-00001597.jpg
This legal document argues that Ghislaine Maxwell is not a flight risk and should be granted release. It asserts that despite the government's claim of her 'frequent international travel', she has not left the United States since Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and subsequent death in August 2019. The document highlights that she remained in the country and maintained contact with prosecutors even as media scrutiny and the risk of her own prosecution intensified, actions which it claims weigh heavily in favor of her release.
DOJ-OGR-00001581.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically a memorandum submitted on behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on July 10, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the document outlines Maxwell's opposition to the government's motion for her detention. The filing lists her legal counsel from the law firms COHEN & GRESSER LLP and HADDON, MORGAN & FORMAN P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00001580.jpg
This document is the final page of a superseding indictment filed on July 8, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, who is named as the defendant. The indictment is presented by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and signed by a foreperson.
DOJ-OGR-00001578.jpg
This document is page 16 of an indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 8, 2020, detailing 'Count Six' against Ghislaine Maxwell for Perjury. It alleges that on July 22, 2016, during a deposition for a civil case (15 Civ. 7433), Maxwell knowingly gave false testimony regarding her knowledge of sex toys at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house.
DOJ-OGR-00001577.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 8, 2020. It outlines Count Five (Perjury), alleging that on or about April 22, 2016, Maxwell lied under oath during a deposition by denying knowledge of a scheme by Jeffrey Epstein to recruit underage girls. The indictment presents this as false testimony, referencing Maxwell's alleged role in transporting a minor from Florida to New York for sex acts with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001575.jpg
This is page 13 of a federal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 8, 2020, charging Ghislaine Maxwell. It details Count 16 regarding the conspiracy to transport minors for illegal sexual activity and lists 'Overt Acts' including Maxwell's participation in group sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein and 'Minor Victim-1' between 1994 and 1997 in New York and Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00001572.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 8, 2020, outlines statutory allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell. It accuses Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and others of engaging in a conspiracy from approximately 1994 to 1997 in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere. The object of the conspiracy was to entice and coerce individuals to travel for the purpose of illegal sexual activity, in violation of federal law.
DOJ-OGR-00001563.jpg
This document is page 1 of a Superseding Indictment filed on July 8, 2020, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines Count One, charging her with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts between 1994 and 1997. The text alleges Maxwell recruited and groomed victims as young as 14 for Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001561.jpg
This is a court order filed on July 9, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330), issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The order sets the logistics for a remote arraignment, initial conference, and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. It provides specific dial-in instructions for the press, public, and international callers, and instructs the US Attorney's Office to coordinate the participation of alleged victims who wish to be heard.
DOJ-OGR-00001559.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 8, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330-AJN). The order grants the motion for attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of Colorado to be admitted 'pro hac vice', allowing him to represent the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in this specific case.
DOJ-OGR-00001554.jpg
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York, filed on July 8, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-CR-330-AJN). The order grants the motion for Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of the Colorado law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to appear and practice pro hac vice as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The document lists Pagliuca's contact information and confirms his good standing with the Colorado bar.
DOJ-OGR-00001551.jpg
This document is a legal declaration filed on July 8, 2020, by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. Pagliuca, licensed in Colorado and a member of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C., submits this declaration to support his motion for admission Pro Hac Vice. He affirms under penalty of perjury that he has no felony convictions, disciplinary actions, or denials of admission by any court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity