SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Location
Mentions
4701
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
2330
Also known as:
Southern District of New York (implied by reporter name) Southern District of New York Office

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00000818.jpg

This document is an automated email notification from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 23, 2019. It confirms the electronic transmission of the appeal record in the criminal case of USA v. Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) to the U.S. Court of Appeals. The notice was sent to a list of individuals, presumably the legal counsel for both the defense and the prosecution.

Email / legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000792.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for the pretrial detention of a defendant, Mr. Epstein. It establishes that rules of evidence are relaxed in bail hearings, giving courts wide discretion, and cites legal precedent that in cases involving sexual victimization of a minor under 18 U.S.C. § 1591, there is a presumption for remand. The document states that the burden is on Mr. Epstein to provide evidence that he is not a danger or flight risk, while the Government retains the ultimate burden of persuasion.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000784.jpg

This is a Decision and Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 18, 2019, regarding the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein. The ruling follows a bail hearing and addresses whether Epstein should be kept in custody (remanded) or released pending his trial on federal charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy. The document establishes the legal framework for the decision, citing relevant federal statutes and noting the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000782.jpg

This document is a page from the court docket in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19-2221), dated July 23, 2019. It details court filings and proceedings from July 15th and 16th, 2019, including motions regarding a speedy trial, the admission of attorney Martin Weinberg to the case, and the filing of transcripts from a prior conference. The entries also reference motions and letters concerning Epstein's pretrial release and detention, showing active litigation between Epstein's legal team and the U.S. government before Judge Richard M. Berman.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000778.jpg

This document is a criminal docket entry from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, for case # 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, titled 'USA v. Epstein,' filed on July 2, 2019. It identifies Jeffrey Epstein as Defendant (1) and lists five attorneys representing him, along with their respective law firms and contact information. Judge Richard M. Berman is assigned to the case.

Criminal docket
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000761.jpg

This is a letter dated August 4, 2025, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer. The Government is responding to the Court's July 31, 2025 order, which required it to provide specific information about grand jury materials in the cases against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter outlines the history of motions to unseal these materials and lists the specific information the Court has requested, such as presentation dates, exhibits, and the Government's position on unsealing them.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000757.jpg

An anonymous victim of Epstein writes a memo to Judge Richard M. Berman, expressing profound distrust in the DOJ and FBI, whom the author believes are protecting powerful individuals involved with Epstein. The author questions the official cause of Epstein's death and argues that the public release of the 'Epstein Files' is harming victims. The memo concludes with a formal request for a third-party review of all documents to ensure that no victims' identities are revealed.

Legal document (endorsed memo to a judge)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000755.jpg

This document is the final page of a legal filing from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, dated July 29, 2025. It is submitted by attorneys from the U.S. Department of Justice, including Attorney General Pamela J. Bondi and signed by U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton, concluding an argument that redactions are necessary to protect victim-related information.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000746.jpg

This is the cover page of a government memorandum filed on July 29, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document addresses cases against both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and is filed in response to court orders from July 22, 2025. Notably, it lists Pamela J. Bondi as U.S. Attorney General, Todd Blanche as Deputy U.S. Attorney General, and Jay Clayton as U.S. Attorney for the SDNY.

Court filing (government memorandum cover page)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000745.jpg

This is a court order from U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 CR. 490). The order, dated July 25, 2025, instructs the Government to deliver all submissions directly to the judge's chambers. Physical submissions must be in a sealed container marked for the attention of Grady MacPhee, and electronic submissions must be sent to his court email address.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000741.jpg

This is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated July 25, 2025, presided over by Judge Richard M. Berman in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The order denies a motion to intervene submitted via letter by MSW Media, Inc., citing legal precedents including United States v. Aref and United States v. Saipov, though the court notes it will consider the views expressed in the letter.

Court order
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000737.jpg

A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated July 22, 2025, addressing a government motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The court acknowledges the request to unseal the transcripts (subject to redactions for victims) but states it cannot rule without a Memorandum of Law from the government addressing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) and the secrecy of grand jury proceedings. The document cites legal precedents regarding the 'special circumstances' required to release such records.

Court order
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000736.jpg

This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on July 21, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the criminal case *United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein* (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Oestericher formally notifies the court of his role as counsel for the government and requests to be added to the electronic filing system for the case. The filing is submitted under the authority of U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000735.jpg

This legal document, page 4 of a court filing, argues for the release of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases due to public interest and diminished privacy concerns following Epstein's death. The Department of Justice commits to redacting victim-identifying information before release. The document is submitted by Pamela J. Bondi, U.S. Attorney General, and Todd Blanche, Deputy Attorney General.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000732.jpg

This is a legal motion filed on July 18, 2025, by the Department of Justice in the Southern District of New York, requesting the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to the Jeffrey Epstein indictment. The motion follows a July 6, 2025, memorandum which concluded that an exhaustive review found no evidence to support investigating uncharged third parties. Citing public interest and transparency, the DOJ seeks to release the underlying grand jury materials.

Legal motion / court filing
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000731.jpg

This document is a 'Notice of Appearance' filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for Case 1:19-cr-490 (USA v. Jeffrey Epstein). It was filed on July 18, 2025 (notably a future date relative to the original 2019 case context) by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. The filing requests that electronic notices for the case be sent to Jordan.Fox@usdoj.gov.

Court filing (notice of appearance)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000729.jpg

This legal document is a Notice of Withdrawal filed on September 26, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Gloria Allred and her law firm, Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, are formally withdrawing as legal counsel for one of the anonymous victims, referred to as 'Jane Doe,' whose victim impact statement was read in court during a hearing on August 27, 2019.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000726.jpg

Fordham law professor Bruce A. Green writes to Judge Richard M. Berman to correct a misunderstanding from an August 27, 2019, hearing in the case *United States v. Epstein*. Green clarifies that, contrary to the court's apparent understanding, he has never served as counsel for Epstein or his estate. He explains that his only involvement in a related matter was serving as an expert witness for Professor Dershowitz in a separate defamation case, a role that concluded in June 2019 and did not involve representation or advocacy.

Letter
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000725.jpg

This document is a 'Notice of Filing of Official Transcript' filed on September 3, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 19CR490). It notifies parties that a transcript for a hearing held on August 27, 2019, has been filed and outlines the specific rules and timelines (7 days) for requesting redactions of personal data identifiers.

Court filing (notice of filing of official transcript)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000716.jpg

This document is page 78 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, containing victim impact statements. One victim details the psychological trauma caused by Epstein, including a near-suicide attempt, and expresses frustration that his death allowed him to escape sentencing. The page concludes with the beginning of a statement from a second victim who describes being raped by Epstein when she was a 16-year-old virgin.

Court transcript / victim impact statement
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000710.jpg

This document is page 72 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, following Jeffrey Epstein's death. An attorney representing victims addresses the court, acknowledging the likely motion to dismiss the criminal case but passionately arguing that the record should remain open. The speaker emphasizes the systemic betrayal of the victims and requests that those not present be allowed to submit victim impact statements so their voices are officially recorded.

Court transcript / legal filing
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000706.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019. An attorney, Ms. Gibbs, reads a victim impact statement from 'Jane Doe 8' into the record. The statement addresses the victim's mixed emotions regarding Jeffrey Epstein's suicide, emphasizing that his death denied his victims the justice of a trial and sentencing.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000696.jpg

This document is a transcript page from a court hearing dated September 3, 2019, following the death of Jeffrey Epstein. Annie Farmer addresses the court, speaking on behalf of her sister, Maria Farmer, who reported Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell for assault in 1996. Annie Farmer expresses disappointment regarding Epstein's death in government custody and urges the court to ensure that his accomplices are held accountable.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000686.jpg

This page is a transcript from a court hearing dated September 3, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein. It concludes a victim impact statement expressing frustration over Epstein's suicide escaping justice, but gratitude for the handling of the current case compared to the past. Attorney Mr. Edwards then addresses the court, referencing a 2008 case filed under the Crime Victims Rights Act and introducing his co-counsel, former judge Paul Cassell.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000685.jpg

This document is a transcript from a court hearing dated September 3, 2019, related to the case against Jeffrey Epstein following his death. It features a concluding statement from an unnamed victim expressing relief that Epstein can no longer harm anyone, followed by attorney Mr. Edwards introducing a letter from an absent client, Michelle Licata. Ms. Licata's statement, read by Brittany Henderson, describes abuse occurring while she was in high school and criticizes the government for the previous 'secret deal' (Non-Prosecution Agreement) made with Epstein without her knowledge.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity